CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 408Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsClassical Anatomy and Histology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrastructural analysis of adult mouse neocortex comparing aldehyde perfusion with cryo fixation

Open access
Korogod, Natalya, Petersen, Carl CH, Knott, Graham W·2015·eLife
DOI 10.7554/elife.05793PMC PMC4530226
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Analysis of brain ultrastructure using electron microscopy typically relies on chemical fixation. However, this is known to cause significant tissue distortion including a reduction in the extracellular space. Cryo fixation is thought to give a truer representation of biological structures, and here we use rapid, high-pressure freezing on adult mouse neocortex to quantify the extent to which these two fixation methods differ in terms of their preservation of the different cellular compartments, and the arrangement of membranes at the synapse and around blood vessels. As well as preserving a physiological extracellular space, cryo fixation reveals larger numbers of docked synaptic vesicles, a smaller glial volume, and a less intimate glial coverage of synapses and blood vessels compared to chemical fixation. The ultrastructure of mouse neocortex therefore differs significantly comparing cryo and chemical fixation conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.05793

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Chemical fixation reduces cortical volume and extracellular space. (A) Coronal sections of fresh (left) and chemically fixed (right) adult mouse brains. Double-headed arrows overlaying the somatosensory cortex of each section show the position at which the cortical thickness was measured. (B) Measurements of cortical thickness show a 16% reduction after chemical fixation (p = 0.00004, unpaired Student's t-test, left). Measurements across tangential sections show 18% shrinkage in the rostrocaudal axis (p = 0.006, one way ANOVA), but not in the mediolateral axis (p = 0.942, one way ANOVA, right). (C) TEM of cryo fixed (left) and chemically fixed (right) neuropil from the adult mouse cerebral cortex show reduction in the extracellular space (pseudo-coloured in blue) after chemical fixation. (D) Measurements of the volume fraction of extracellular space from serial section analysis showed a six-fold difference between the two fixation techniques (p = 0.003, one way ANOVA). (E) Measurements of volumes occupied by extracellular space, neurites, and glia, from serial section transmission electron microscopy sections showed how the different compartments are altered by chemical fixation. Volume occupied by astrocytic processes was significantly increased after chemical fixation (p = 0.01, one way ANOVA). However, there was no change in the volume occupied by axons and dendrites (p = 0.074, one way ANOVA). As the volume of the cortex is reduced by 31% after chemical fixation, these percentages are shown in the bar chart in which the total volume of chemically fixed neuropil is 69% of the cryo-fixed value (100%). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.003
Figure 1. Chemical fixation reduces cortical volume and extracellular space. (A) Coronal sections of fresh (left) and chemically fixed (right) adult mouse brains. Double-headed arrows overlaying the somatosensory cortex of each section show the position at which the cortical thickness was measured. (B) Measurements of cortical thickness show a 16% reduction after chemical fixation (p = 0.00004, unpaired Student's t-test, left). Measurements across tangential sections show 18% shrinkage in the rostrocaudal axis (p = 0.006, one way ANOVA), but not in the mediolateral axis (p = 0.942, one way ANOVA, right). (C) TEM of cryo fixed (left) and chemically fixed (right) neuropil from the adult mouse cerebral cortex show reduction in the extracellular space (pseudo-coloured in blue) after chemical fixation. (D) Measurements of the volume fraction of extracellular space from serial section analysis showed a six-fold difference between the two fixation techniques (p = 0.003, one way ANOVA). (E) Measurements of volumes occupied by extracellular space, neurites, and glia, from serial section transmission electron microscopy sections showed how the different compartments are altered by chemical fixation. Volume occupied by astrocytic processes was significantly increased after chemical fixation (p = 0.01, one way ANOVA). However, there was no change in the volume occupied by axons and dendrites (p = 0.074, one way ANOVA). As the volume of the cortex is reduced by 31% after chemical fixation, these percentages are shown in the bar chart in which the total volume of chemically fixed neuropil is 69% of the cryo-fixed value (100%). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.003CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Schematic scale model (upper image) representing the fresh somatosensory cortex (outer cube) and chemically fixed cortex (inner cube), showing the extent to which the two fixations change the volume of this brain region. Graph (lower left) showing the percentage of neuropil volume occupied by astrocytic (marked ‘Glia’) elements and ECS, in the cryo and chemically fixed neuropil. Graph (lower right) shows the percentage occupied by axons and dendrites. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One way ANOVA assessed statistical significance. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.005
Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Schematic scale model (upper image) representing the fresh somatosensory cortex (outer cube) and chemically fixed cortex (inner cube), showing the extent to which the two fixations change the volume of this brain region. Graph (lower left) showing the percentage of neuropil volume occupied by astrocytic (marked ‘Glia’) elements and ECS, in the cryo and chemically fixed neuropil. Graph (lower right) shows the percentage occupied by axons and dendrites. Data are represented as mean ± SD. One way ANOVA assessed statistical significance. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.005CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Comparison between chemical fixation (left hand images; A and C) and cryo fixation (right hand images; B and D) of acute brain slices shows that both fixation conditions are able to reveal significant amounts of extracellular space. However, this can only be clearly seen within 10 microns of the slice surface (B). Deeper into the cryo-fixed slice, the cellular elements appear disrupted with a fine latticed patterning indicating damage caused by ice crystal formation (D). This is not apparent at the same depth in the chemical fixed slice (C). Scale bar is 1 micron. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.006
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Comparison between chemical fixation (left hand images; A and C) and cryo fixation (right hand images; B and D) of acute brain slices shows that both fixation conditions are able to reveal significant amounts of extracellular space. However, this can only be clearly seen within 10 microns of the slice surface (B). Deeper into the cryo-fixed slice, the cellular elements appear disrupted with a fine latticed patterning indicating damage caused by ice crystal formation (D). This is not apparent at the same depth in the chemical fixed slice (C). Scale bar is 1 micron. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.006CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Cryo fixation reveals a larger peri-synaptic space and reduced astrocytic coverage. (A) Cryo-fixed neuropil shows synaptic contacts with large amounts of surrounding extracellular space. (B) Synaptic density measurements show the chemically fixed neuropil to have 38% more synapses (left graph, p < 0.05, one way ANOVA). Dendritic spine synapses (presumed glutamatergic) show greater distances between the edge of the contact zone and the nearest membrane compared with chemical fixation (middle graph, p < 0.001, unpaired Student's t-test). Cryo-fixed synapses show less astrocytic coverage (right graph, p < 0.01; one way ANOVA). (C) Reconstructions from serial electron microscope images, of axonal boutons (blue) synapsing with dendritic spines (grey), show the astrocytic processes in the near vicinity (red). In the cryo-fixed synapse (left), the astrocytic process is not squeezed close to the synaptic contact (indicated with vesicles in yellow). In the chemically fixed example (right), the astrocyte tightly surrounds the synapse, where the vesicle-filled axonal bouton contacts the spine behind it. (D) Astrocytic processes reconstructed from serial FIBSEM images using the ilastik software (www.ilastik.org) show that chemically fixed astrocytic processes (right) have a more elaborate morphology with small processes extending from the flattened lamellae compared with the less complex structure of cryo-fixed astrocytes (left). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.007
Figure 2. Cryo fixation reveals a larger peri-synaptic space and reduced astrocytic coverage. (A) Cryo-fixed neuropil shows synaptic contacts with large amounts of surrounding extracellular space. (B) Synaptic density measurements show the chemically fixed neuropil to have 38% more synapses (left graph, p < 0.05, one way ANOVA). Dendritic spine synapses (presumed glutamatergic) show greater distances between the edge of the contact zone and the nearest membrane compared with chemical fixation (middle graph, p < 0.001, unpaired Student's t-test). Cryo-fixed synapses show less astrocytic coverage (right graph, p < 0.01; one way ANOVA). (C) Reconstructions from serial electron microscope images, of axonal boutons (blue) synapsing with dendritic spines (grey), show the astrocytic processes in the near vicinity (red). In the cryo-fixed synapse (left), the astrocytic process is not squeezed close to the synaptic contact (indicated with vesicles in yellow). In the chemically fixed example (right), the astrocyte tightly surrounds the synapse, where the vesicle-filled axonal bouton contacts the spine behind it. (D) Astrocytic processes reconstructed from serial FIBSEM images using the ilastik software (www.ilastik.org) show that chemically fixed astrocytic processes (right) have a more elaborate morphology with small processes extending from the flattened lamellae compared with the less complex structure of cryo-fixed astrocytes (left). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.007CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Cryo-fixed capillaries show less astrocytic coverage. (A) Electron micrographs of transversely sectioned capillaries show the astrocytic endfeet pseudo-coloured in orange. Cryo-fixed example shows a darkly stained erythrocyte within the vessel lumen. (B) Schematic diagram indicates the coverage measured. (C) Chemically fixed tissue contains capillaries with more glial coverage (p < 0.0001, n = 11 vessels cryo, n = 69 vessels perfused, unpaired Student's t-test). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.009
Figure 3. Cryo-fixed capillaries show less astrocytic coverage. (A) Electron micrographs of transversely sectioned capillaries show the astrocytic endfeet pseudo-coloured in orange. Cryo-fixed example shows a darkly stained erythrocyte within the vessel lumen. (B) Schematic diagram indicates the coverage measured. (C) Chemically fixed tissue contains capillaries with more glial coverage (p < 0.0001, n = 11 vessels cryo, n = 69 vessels perfused, unpaired Student's t-test). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.009CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Vesicles of symmetric synapses are distorted by chemical fixation. (A) Cryo-fixed synapses on a dendritic shaft (left image) and on a dendritic spine (middle image) show similar rounded vesicles. A chemically fixed, high-pressure frozen and cryo-substituted (right hand image) synapse on a dendritic shaft, however, shows typical features of a symmetric (presumed GABAergic) synapse with ovoid vesicles. (B) Measurements of the short (x) and long (y) diameters of synaptic vesicles. Synapses in cryo-fixed tissue cannot be classified according to the symmetry of pre- and post-synaptic densities and all synaptic vesicles were round. Asymmetric synapses in chemically fixed tissue show similarly shaped vesicles, as do the vesicles at asymmetric synapses of chemically fixed tissue that is then high-pressure frozen and freeze substituted in resin. The symmetric synapses, seen in chemically fixed tissue, show vesicles with characteristic ovoid shapes irrespective of how they were resin embedded. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.011
Figure 4. Vesicles of symmetric synapses are distorted by chemical fixation. (A) Cryo-fixed synapses on a dendritic shaft (left image) and on a dendritic spine (middle image) show similar rounded vesicles. A chemically fixed, high-pressure frozen and cryo-substituted (right hand image) synapse on a dendritic shaft, however, shows typical features of a symmetric (presumed GABAergic) synapse with ovoid vesicles. (B) Measurements of the short (x) and long (y) diameters of synaptic vesicles. Synapses in cryo-fixed tissue cannot be classified according to the symmetry of pre- and post-synaptic densities and all synaptic vesicles were round. Asymmetric synapses in chemically fixed tissue show similarly shaped vesicles, as do the vesicles at asymmetric synapses of chemically fixed tissue that is then high-pressure frozen and freeze substituted in resin. The symmetric synapses, seen in chemically fixed tissue, show vesicles with characteristic ovoid shapes irrespective of how they were resin embedded. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.011CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Examples of glutamatergic synapses (A, B, C), situated on dendritic spines, with round clear vesicles; and presumed GABAergic synapses (D, E, F) on dendritic shafts showing flattened, dark vesicles. Scale bar is 200 microns. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.013
Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Examples of glutamatergic synapses (A, B, C), situated on dendritic spines, with round clear vesicles; and presumed GABAergic synapses (D, E, F) on dendritic shafts showing flattened, dark vesicles. Scale bar is 200 microns. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.013CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Cryo fixation preserves larger numbers of vesicles at the pre-synaptic membrane. (A) Electron tomography of a 200-nm thick section shows a cryo-fixed (upper) synapse with a large number of vesicles close to the presynaptic membrane in comparison with a similar chemically fixed synapse (lower). In each case three sample images are shown from complete tomographic series. Three-dimensional reconstructions of this region (right hand images) show all the vesicles (red) in relation to the presynaptic membrane (blue). (B) Measurements of the distance of vesicles from the presynaptic membrane show that more vesicles are arranged closer (0–30 nm) to the synapse after cryo fixation (p < 0.0001, unpaired Student's t-test). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.014
Figure 5. Cryo fixation preserves larger numbers of vesicles at the pre-synaptic membrane. (A) Electron tomography of a 200-nm thick section shows a cryo-fixed (upper) synapse with a large number of vesicles close to the presynaptic membrane in comparison with a similar chemically fixed synapse (lower). In each case three sample images are shown from complete tomographic series. Three-dimensional reconstructions of this region (right hand images) show all the vesicles (red) in relation to the presynaptic membrane (blue). (B) Measurements of the distance of vesicles from the presynaptic membrane show that more vesicles are arranged closer (0–30 nm) to the synapse after cryo fixation (p < 0.0001, unpaired Student's t-test). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.014CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Synapses found on dendritic spines were the same length. Data are represented as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t-test assessed statistical significance; p = 0.561. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.016
Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Synapses found on dendritic spines were the same length. Data are represented as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student's t-test assessed statistical significance; p = 0.561. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.016CC BY · PubMed Central
Author response image 1. Electron micrograph showing the neuropil from an acute slice chemically fixed immediately after it was vibratome sectioned. The image is taken 50 micons from the slice surface. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.019
Author response image 1. Electron micrograph showing the neuropil from an acute slice chemically fixed immediately after it was vibratome sectioned. The image is taken 50 micons from the slice surface. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05793.019CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 408

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Korogod, N., Petersen, C. C., & Knott, G. W.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Petersen, Carl CH
  • Knott, Graham W
ORCID
Venue
eLife
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Published
2015-08-11
Volume
4
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.7554/elife.05793
PMC
PMC4530226
OpenAlex
W1926373965
Cited by
408
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 5
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Schweizerische Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP)
  • European Research Council (ERC)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Classical Anatomy and Histology
Keywords
neocortex, cryofixation, chemical fixation, high-pressure freezing, extracellular space, synaptic vesicles, synapses, blood vessels, tissue deformation
MeSH terms
Aldehydes, Animals, Fixatives, Freezing, Microscopy, Electron, Perfusion, Tissue Fixation, Neocortex, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review