Cited by 339Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockForensic and Genetic Research

Reduced signal for polygenic adaptation of height in UK Biobank

Open access
Berg, Jeremy J, Harpak, Arbel, Sinnott-Armstrong, Nasa, Joergensen, Anja Moltke, Mostafavi, Hakhamanesh, Field, Yair, Boyle, Evan August, Zhang, Xinjun +3 more·2019·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Several recent papers have reported strong signals of selection on European polygenic height scores. These analyses used height effect estimates from the GIANT consortium and replication studies. Here, we describe a new analysis based on the the UK Biobank (UKB), a large, independent dataset. We find that the signals of selection using UKB effect estimates are strongly attenuated or absent. We also provide evidence that previous analyses were confounded by population stratification. Therefore, the conclusion of strong polygenic adaptation now lacks support. Moreover, these discrepancies highlight (1) that methods for correcting for population stratification in GWAS may not always be sufficient for polygenic trait analyses, and (2) that claims of differences in polygenic scores between populations should be treated with caution until these issues are better understood. Editorial note: This article has been through an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review. The Reviewing Editor's assessment is that all the issues have been addressed (see decision letter).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.39725

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous evidence for adaptation on height using siblings in UK Biobank was suggestive of some adaptation, but statistically inconclusive.

    “Previous evidence for adaptation on height using siblings in UK Biobank was suggestive of some adaptation, but statistically inconclusive26.”

    From Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects (2022) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results (GWAS datasets; no page supplied) identify a UK Biobank sibling-pair analysis, and the Discussion says UK Biobank selection signals were absent or greatly attenuated, with weak significance in some analyses. Those passages support a cautious reading of the evidence, but they do not specifically say that the sibling-based result was suggestive yet statistically inconclusive. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Within-sibship GWAS data are robust against population stratification.

    “Within-sibship GWAS data are particularly useful in this context as they are robust against population stratification26,27,29.”
  • Given previous concerns, we performed several sensitivity analyses for the height analysis.

    “Given previous concerns26,27, we performed several sensitivity analyses for the height analysis detailed in the Supplementary Methods.”
  • A previous study reporting polygenic adaptation on height in the UK population was found to be biased by population stratification in the GIANT consortium.

    “A previous study reporting polygenic adaptation on height in the UK population was found to be biased by population stratification in the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium26–28.”
  • Population stratification in GWAS data likely confounded previous estimates of polygenic adaptation on height.

    “However, this approach is sensitive to population stratification as illustrated by recent work using UK Biobank data which showed that population stratification in GWAS data likely confounded previous estimates of polygenic adaptation on height26,27.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Allison DB Heo M Kaplan N Martin ER 1999 Sibling-based tests of linkage and association for quantitative traits The American Journal of Human Genetics 64 1754 1764 10.1086/302404 10330363 PMC1377919 · DOI
  2. Berg JJ Zhang X Coop G 2017 Polygenic adaptation has impacted multiple anthropometric traits bioRxiv 10.1101/167551 · DOI
  3. Berg JJ Coop G 2014 A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation PLOS Genetics 10 e1004412 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412 25102153 PMC4125079 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Berisa T Pickrell JK 2016 Approximately independent linkage disequilibrium blocks in human populations Bioinformatics 32 283 285 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv546 26395773 PMC4731402 · DOI
  5. Bulik-Sullivan B Finucane HK Anttila V Gusev A Day FR Loh PR Duncan L Perry JR Patterson N Robinson EB Daly MJ Price AL Neale BM ReproGen Consortium Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3 2015a An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits Nature Genetics 47 1236 1241 10.1038/ng.3406 26414676 PMC4797329 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bycroft C Freeman C Petkova D Band G Elliott LT Sharp K Motyer A Vukcevic D Delaneau O O'Connell J Cortes A Welsh S Young A Effingham M McVean G Leslie S Allen N Donnelly P Marchini J 2018 The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data Nature 562 203 209 10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z 30305743 PMC6786975 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chang CC Chow CC Tellier LC Vattikuti S Purcell SM Lee JJ 2015 Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets GigaScience 4 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 25722852 PMC4342193 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Charlesworth B Morgan MT Charlesworth D 1993 The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation Genetics 134 1289 1303 8375663 PMC1205596
  9. Charlesworth B 1998 Measures of divergence between populations and the effect of forces that reduce variability Molecular Biology and Evolution 15 538 543 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025953 9580982 · DOI
  10. Das S Forer L Schönherr S Sidore C Locke AE Kwong A Vrieze SI Chew EY Levy S McGue M Schlessinger D Stambolian D Loh PR Iacono WG Swaroop A Scott LJ Cucca F Kronenberg F Boehnke M Abecasis GR Fuchsberger C 2016 Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods Nature Genetics 48 1284 1287 10.1038/ng.3656 27571263 PMC5157836 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Field Y Boyle EA Telis N Gao Z Gaulton KJ Golan D Yengo L Rocheleau G Froguel P McCarthy MI Pritchard JK 2016 Detection of human adaptation during the past 2000 years Science 354 760 764 10.1126/science.aag0776 27738015 PMC5182071 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Finucane HK Bulik-Sullivan B Gusev A Trynka G Reshef Y Loh PR Anttila V Xu H Zang C Farh K Ripke S Day FR Purcell S Stahl E Lindstrom S Perry JR Okada Y Raychaudhuri S Daly MJ Patterson N Neale BM Price AL ReproGen Consortium Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium RACI Consortium 2015 Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics Nature Genetics 47 1228 1235 10.1038/ng.3404 26414678 PMC4626285 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Firth D 1993 Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates Biometrika 80 27 38 10.1093/biomet/80.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Guo J Wu Y Zhu Z Zheng Z Trzaskowski M Zeng J Robinson MR Visscher PM Yang J 2018 Global genetic differentiation of complex traits shaped by natural selection in humans Nature Communications 9 1865 10.1038/s41467-018-04191-y 29760457 PMC5951811 · DOI
  15. Hemani G Yang J Vinkhuyzen A Powell JE Willemsen G Hottenga JJ Abdellaoui A Mangino M Valdes AM Medland SE Madden PA Heath AC Henders AK Nyholt DR de Geus EJ Magnusson PK Ingelsson E Montgomery GW Spector TD Boomsma DI Pedersen NL Martin NG Visscher PM 2013 Inference of the genetic architecture underlying BMI and height with the use of 20,240 sibling pairs The American Journal of Human Genetics 93 865 875 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.005 24183453 PMC3965855 · DOI
  16. Hill A Loh PR Bharadwaj RB Pons P Shang J Guinan E Lakhani K Kilty I Jelinsky SA 2017 Stepwise distributed open innovation contests for software development: acceleration of genome-wide association analysis GigaScience 6 1 10 10.1093/gigascience/gix009 28327993 PMC5467032 · DOI
  17. Josephs EB Berg JJ Ross-Ibarra J Coop G 2018 Detecting adaptive differentiation in structured populations with genomic data and common gardens bioRxiv 10.1101/368506 PMC6404252 30679259 · DOI
  18. Kerminen S Martin AR Koskela J Ruotsalainen SE Havulinna AS Surakka I Palotie A Perola M Salomaa V Daly MJ Ripatti S Pirinen M 2018 Geographic variation and bias in Polygenic scores of complex diseases and traits in Finland bioRxiv 10.1101/485441 PMC6562021 31155286 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kong A Thorleifsson G Gudbjartsson DF Masson G Sigurdsson A Jonasdottir A Walters GB Jonasdottir A Gylfason A Kristinsson KT Gudjonsson SA Frigge ML Helgason A Thorsteinsdottir U Stefansson K 2010 Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals Nature 467 1099 1103 10.1038/nature09525 20981099 · DOI
  20. Kunsch HR 1989 The Jackknife and the Bootstrap for General Stationary Observations The Annals of Statistics 17 1217 1241 10.1214/aos/1176347265 · DOI
  21. Lango Allen H Estrada K Lettre G Berndt SI Weedon MN Rivadeneira F Willer CJ Jackson AU Vedantam S Raychaudhuri S Ferreira T Wood AR Weyant RJ Segrè AV Speliotes EK Wheeler E Soranzo N Park JH Yang J Gudbjartsson D Heard-Costa NL Randall JC Qi L Vernon Smith A Mägi R Pastinen T Liang L Heid IM Luan J Thorleifsson G Winkler TW Goddard ME Sin Lo K Palmer C Workalemahu T Aulchenko YS Johansson A Zillikens MC Feitosa MF Esko T Johnson T Ketkar S Kraft P Mangino M Prokopenko I Absher D Albrecht E Ernst F Glazer NL Hayward C Hottenga JJ Jacobs KB Knowles JW Kutalik Z Monda KL Polasek O Preuss M Rayner NW Robertson NR Steinthorsdottir V Tyrer JP Voight BF Wiklund F Xu J Zhao JH Nyholt DR Pellikka N Perola M Perry JR Surakka I Tammesoo ML Altmaier EL Amin N Aspelund T Bhangale T Boucher G Chasman DI Chen C Coin L Cooper MN Dixon AL Gibson Q Grundberg E Hao K Juhani Junttila M Kaplan LM Kettunen J König IR Kwan T Lawrence RW Levinson DF Lorentzon M McKnight B Morris AP Müller M Suh Ngwa J Purcell S Rafelt S Salem RM Salvi E Sanna S Shi J Sovio U Thompson JR Turchin MC Vandenput L Verlaan DJ Vitart V White CC Ziegler A Almgren P Balmforth AJ Campbell H Citterio L De Grandi A Dominiczak A Duan J Elliott P Elosua R Eriksson JG Freimer NB Geus EJ Glorioso N Haiqing S Hartikainen AL Havulinna AS Hicks AA Hui J Igl W Illig T Jula A Kajantie E Kilpeläinen TO Koiranen M Kolcic I Koskinen S Kovacs P Laitinen J Liu J Lokki ML Marusic A Maschio A Meitinger T Mulas A Paré G Parker AN Peden JF Petersmann A Pichler I Pietiläinen KH Pouta A Ridderstråle M Rotter JI Sambrook JG Sanders AR Schmidt CO Sinisalo J Smit JH Stringham HM Bragi Walters G Widen E Wild SH Willemsen G Zagato L Zgaga L Zitting P Alavere H Farrall M McArdle WL Nelis M Peters MJ Ripatti S van Meurs JB Aben KK Ardlie KG Beckmann JS Beilby JP Bergman RN Bergmann S Collins FS Cusi D den Heijer M Eiriksdottir G Gejman PV Hall AS Hamsten A Huikuri HV Iribarren C Kähönen M Kaprio J Kathiresan S Kiemeney L Kocher T Launer LJ Lehtimäki T Melander O Mosley TH Musk AW Nieminen MS O'Donnell CJ Ohlsson C Oostra B Palmer LJ Raitakari O Ridker PM Rioux JD Rissanen A Rivolta C Schunkert H Shuldiner AR Siscovick DS Stumvoll M Tönjes A Tuomilehto J van Ommen GJ Viikari J Heath AC Martin NG Montgomery GW Province MA Kayser M Arnold AM Atwood LD Boerwinkle E Chanock SJ Deloukas P Gieger C Grönberg H Hall P Hattersley AT Hengstenberg C Hoffman W Lathrop GM Salomaa V Schreiber S Uda M Waterworth D Wright AF Assimes TL Barroso I Hofman A Mohlke KL Boomsma DI Caulfield MJ Cupples LA Erdmann J Fox CS Gudnason V Gyllensten U Harris TB Hayes RB Jarvelin MR Mooser V Munroe PB Ouwehand WH Penninx BW Pramstaller PP Quertermous T Rudan I Samani NJ Spector TD Völzke H Watkins H Wilson JF Groop LC Haritunians T Hu FB Kaplan RC Metspalu A North KE Schlessinger D Wareham NJ Hunter DJ O'Connell JR Strachan DP Wichmann HE Borecki IB van Duijn CM Schadt EE Thorsteinsdottir U Peltonen L Uitterlinden AG Visscher PM Chatterjee N Loos RJ Boehnke M McCarthy MI Ingelsson E Lindgren CM Abecasis GR Stefansson K Frayling TM Hirschhorn JN 2010 Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height Nature 467 832 838 10.1038/nature09410 20881960 PMC2955183 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Loh P Kichaev G Gazal S Schoech AP Price AL 2017 Mixed model association for biobank-scale data sets bioRxiv 10.1101/194944 PMC6309610 29892013 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Manichaikul A Mychaleckyj JC Rich SS Daly K Sale M Chen WM 2010 Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies Bioinformatics 26 2867 2873 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq559 20926424 PMC3025716 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Martiniano R Cassidy LM Ó'Maoldúin R McLaughlin R Silva NM Manco L Fidalgo D Pereira T Coelho MJ Serra M Burger J Parreira R Moran E Valera AC Porfirio E Boaventura R Silva AM Bradley DG 2017 The population genomics of archaeological transition in west Iberia: Investigation of ancient substructure using imputation and haplotype-based methods PLOS Genetics 13 e1006852 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006852 28749934 PMC5531429 · DOI
  25. Novembre J Barton NH 2018 Tread lightly interpreting polygenic tests of selection Genetics 208 1351 1355 10.1534/genetics.118.300786 29618592 PMC5886544 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Pickrell JK 2014 Joint analysis of functional genomic data and genome-wide association studies of 18 human traits The American Journal of Human Genetics 94 559 573 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.004 24702953 PMC3980523 · DOI
  27. Racimo F Berg JJ Pickrell JK 2018 Detecting polygenic adaptation in admixture graphs Genetics 208 1565 1584 10.1534/genetics.117.300489 29348143 PMC5887149 · DOI
  28. Renaud G 2018 glactools: a command-line toolset for the management of genotype likelihoods and allele counts Bioinformatics 34 3 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx749 29186325 · DOI
  29. Robinson MR Hemani G Medina-Gomez C Mezzavilla M Esko T Shakhbazov K Powell JE Vinkhuyzen A Berndt SI Gustafsson S Justice AE Kahali B Locke AE Pers TH Vedantam S Wood AR van Rheenen W Andreassen OA Gasparini P Metspalu A Berg LH Veldink JH Rivadeneira F Werge TM Abecasis GR Boomsma DI Chasman DI de Geus EJ Frayling TM Hirschhorn JN Hottenga JJ Ingelsson E Loos RJ Magnusson PK Martin NG Montgomery GW North KE Pedersen NL Spector TD Speliotes EK Goddard ME Yang J Visscher PM 2015 Population genetic differentiation of height and body mass index across Europe Nature Genetics 47 1357 1362 10.1038/ng.3401 26366552 PMC4984852 · DOI
  30. Sohail M Maier RM Ganna A Bloemendal A Martin AR Turchin MC Chiang CW Hirschhorn J Daly MJ Patterson N Neale B Mathieson I Reich D Sunyaev SR 2019 Polygenic adaptation on height is overestimated due to uncorrected stratification in genome-wide association studies eLife 8 e39702 10.7554/eLife.39702 30895926 PMC6428571 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Spielman RS Ewens WJ 1998 A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test The American Journal of Human Genetics 62 450 458 10.1086/301714 9463321 PMC1376890 · DOI
  32. Splansky GL Corey D Yang Q Atwood LD Cupples LA Benjamin EJ D'Agostino RB Fox CS Larson MG Murabito JM O'Donnell CJ Vasan RS Wolf PA Levy D 2007 The third generation cohort of the national heart, lung, and blood institute's Framingham Heart Study: design, recruitment, and initial examination American Journal of Epidemiology 165 1328 1335 10.1093/aje/kwm021 17372189 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Turchin MC Chiang CW Palmer CD Sankararaman S Reich D Hirschhorn JN Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) Consortium 2012 Evidence of widespread selection on standing variation in Europe at height-associated SNPs Nature Genetics 44 1015 1019 10.1038/ng.2368 22902787 PMC3480734 · DOI · Paper page
  34. UK10K Consortium 2015 The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease Nature 526 82 90 10.1038/nature14962 26367797 PMC4773891 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Uricchio LH Kitano HC Gusev A Zaitlen NA 2019 An evolutionary compass for detecting signals of polygenic selection and mutational bias Evolution Letters 3 69 79 10.1002/evl3.97 30788143 PMC6369964 · DOI
  36. Yengo L Yang J Visscher PM 2018 Expectation of the intercept from bivariate ld score regression in the presence of population stratification bioRxiv 10.1101/310565 · DOI
  37. Zoledziewska M Sidore C Chiang CWK Sanna S Mulas A Steri M Busonero F Marcus JH Marongiu M Maschio A Ortega Del Vecchyo D Floris M Meloni A Delitala A Concas MP Murgia F Biino G Vaccargiu S Nagaraja R Lohmueller KE Timpson NJ Soranzo N Tachmazidou I Dedoussis G Zeggini E Uzzau S Jones C Lyons R Angius A Abecasis GR Novembre J Schlessinger D Cucca F UK10K consortium Understanding Society Scientific Group 2015 Height-reducing variants and selection for short stature in Sardinia Nature Genetics 47 1352 1356 10.1038/ng.3403 26366551 PMC4627578 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berg, J. J., Harpak, A., Sinnott-Armstrong, N., Joergensen, A. M., Mostafavi, H., Field, Y., Boyle, E. A., Zhang, X., Racimo, F., Pritchard, J. K., & Coop, G.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Lundbeck GeoGenetics Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Berg, Jeremy J
  • Pritchard, Jonathan K
  • Coop, Graham
Venue
eLife
Published
2019-03-21
Volume
8
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952596949
Cited by
339
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
33.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 GM115889, F32 GM126787, R01 GM121372, R01 HG008140, R01 GM108779)
  • Stanford Center for Computational, Evolutionary and Human Genomics (Fellowship)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (National Defense Science and Engineering Gran, National Defense Science and Engineering Grant)
  • Stanford University (Graduate Fellowship)
  • Villum Fonden (Young Investigator award)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
polygenic adaptation, height, polygenic risk score, selection signals, population stratification, UK Biobank, effect estimates
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Body Height, Europe, Humans, Selection, Genetic, Databases, Factual, Multifactorial Inheritance, Biostatistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review