Cited by 34Amphibian and Reptile BiologySpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeBat Biology and Ecology Studies

Lowland extirpation of anuran populations on a tropical mountain

Open access
Campos-Cerqueira, Marconi, Aide, T. Mitchell·2017·PeerJ

Abstract

Background: Climate change and infectious diseases threaten animal and plant species, even in natural and protected areas. To cope with these changes, species may acclimate, adapt, move or decline. Here, we test for shifts in anuran distributions in the Luquillo Mountains (LM), a tropical montane forest in Puerto Rico by comparing species distributions from historical (1931–1989)and current data (2015/2016). Methods: Historical data, which included different methodologies, were gathered through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and published literature, and the current data were collected using acoustic recorders along three elevational transects. Results: In the recordings, we detected the 12 native frog species known to occur in LM. Over a span of ∼25 years, two species have become extinct and four species suffered extirpation in lowland areas. As a consequence, low elevation areas in the LM (<300 m) have lost at least six anuran species. Discussion: We hypothesize that these extirpations are due to the effects of climate change and infectious diseases, which are restricting many species to higher elevations and a much smaller area. Land use change is not responsible for these changes because LM has been a protected reserve for the past 80 years. However, previous studies indicate that (1) climate change has increased temperatures in Puerto Rico, and (2) Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) was found in 10 native species and early detection of Bd coincides with anurans declines in the LM. Our study confirms the general impressions of amphibian population extirpations at low elevations, and corroborates the levels of threat assigned by IUCN.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj.4059

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since 1998, 8 of 33 Luquillo forest bird species and 10 of 12 resident frog species have undergone elevational shifts.

    “Since 1998, 8 of 33 Luquillo forest bird species (124) and 10 of 12 resident frog species (125) have undergone elevational shifts.”
  • Luquillo forest birds and frogs are known to exhibit elevational range shifts similar to those encountered on other tropical mountains.

    “However, Luquillo forest birds and frogs are known to exhibit elevational range shifts similar to those encountered on other tropical mountains.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Burrowes PA Longo AV Joglar RL 2008 Geographic distribution of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Puerto Rico Herpetological Review 39 321 324
  2. La Marca E Reinthaler HP 1991 Population changes in Atelopus species of the Cordillera de Mérida, Venezuela Herpetological Review 22 125 128
  3. Longo AV Burrowes PA Joglar RL 2006 Study of the effect of drought on the dispersion pattern of rainforest Eleutherodactylus 20th AAAS conference

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campos-Cerqueira, M., & Aide, T. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico
  • University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras (PR)
Venue
PeerJ
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2017-11-15
Volume
5
Pages
e4059
ISSN
2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769616049
Cited by
34
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (8933/13-8)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
amphibian decline, climate change, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, chytridiomycosis, range shifts, altitudinal range shift, tropical montane forest, Luquillo Experimental Forest, amphibian conservation, IUCN threat assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review