Cited by 149Migration, Health and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Meta-Analysis of the Use of Narrative Exposure Therapy for the Effects of Trauma among Refugee Populations

Open access
Gwozdziewycz, Nicolas, Mehl-Madrona, Lewis·2013·The Permanente Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Narrative therapies, especially narrative exposure therapy, are used to treat the effects of trauma in refugees and to prevent psychiatric illness. These methods involve helping the person to tell the story of what happened to them until it no longer elicits anxiety. METHODS: We reviewed all quantitative studies related to narrative exposure methods for treating trauma or posttraumatic stress disorder in refugees. We focused on studies with sufficient information to calculate effect sizes and statistical power. RESULTS: We found 7 quantitative studies for which effect size and power could be calculated. The total average effect size for all interventions was 0.63 (medium). The average effect size for studies in which interventions were administered by physicians, adequately trained graduate students, or both was 0.53. The effect size for studies in which the counselors were themselves refugees was 1.02. The 95% confidence intervals for the effect sizes of narrative exposure therapy did not reach below 0. CONCLUSION: Studies demonstrating the effectiveness of narrative methods have adequate effect sizes and statistical power. Empowering lay counselors to treat their fellow refugees in future studies is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7812/tpp/12-058

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. REVIEW ARTICLE Meta-Analysis of the Use of Narrative Exposure Therapy for the Effects of Trauma Among Refugee Populations References

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gwozdziewycz, N., & Mehl-Madrona, L.
Affiliations
  • Argosy University (US)
  • Core Faculty at the Union Institute and University in Brattleboro, VT..
Venue
The Permanente Journal
Published
2013-03
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
70-76
ISSN
  • 1552-5767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5775
OpenAlex
W2152786206
Cited by
149
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Permanente Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
narrative exposure therapy, narrative therapy, refugee trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, refugees, trauma treatment, lay counselors, effect size, statistical power
MeSH terms
Humans, Refugees, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Narrative Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review