Cited by 70Congenital Heart Disease StudiesVascular anomalies and interventionsPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Fetal Aortic Arch Anomalies: Key Sonographic Views for Their Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Implications Using the Cardiovascular System Sonographic Evaluation Protocol

Bravo, Coral, Gámez, Francisco, Pérez, Ricardo, Álvarez, Teresa, De León-Luis, Juan·2016·Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Abstract

Aortic arch anomalies are present in 1% to 2% of the general population and are commonly associated with congenital heart disease, chromosomal defects, and tracheaesophageal compression in postnatal life. The sonographically based detection of aortic arch anomalies lies in the 3‐vessel and trachea view. Although highly sensitive, this view alone does not allow identification of the aortic arch branching pattern, which prevents an accurate diagnosis. The systematic addition of a subclavian artery view as part of a standardized procedure may be useful in the differential diagnosis of these conditions. We describe the sonographic assessment of fetal aortic arch anomalies by combining 2 fetal transverse views: the 3‐vessel and trachea view and the subclavian artery view, which are included in the cardiovascular system sonographic evaluation protocol. We also review the sonographic findings and the clinical implications of fetal aortic arch anomalies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7863/ultra.15.02063

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bravo, C., Gámez, F., Pérez, R., Álvarez, T., & De León-Luis, J.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-29
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
237-251
ISSN
  • 0278-4297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9613
OpenAlex
W2277417691
Cited by
70
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2016-06-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS PI13-02769)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
fetal echocardiography, aortic arch branching pattern, congenital heart disease, tracheoesophageal compression, prenatal diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aorta, Thoracic, Cardiovascular System, Clinical Protocols, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review