The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values
Open accessAbstract
This article presents an overview of the Schwartz theory of basic human values. It discusses the nature of values and spells out the features that are common to all values and what distinguishes one value from another. The theory identifies ten basic personal values that are recognized across cultures and explains where they come from. At the heart of the theory is the idea that values form a circular structure that reflects the motivations each value expresses. This circular structure, that captures the conflicts and compatibility among the ten values is apparently culturally universal. The article elucidates the psychological principles that give rise to it. Next, it presents the two major methods developed to measure the basic values, the Schwartz Value Survey and the Portrait Values Questionnaire. Findings from 82 countries, based on these and other methods, provide evidence for the validity of the theory across cultures. The findings reveal substantial differences in the value priorities of individuals. Surprisingly, however, the average value priorities of most societal groups exhibit a similar hierarchical order whose existence the article explains. The last section of the article clarifies how values differ from other concepts used to explain behavior—attitudes, beliefs, norms, and traits.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been suggested that self-control is a facet of conscientiousness within the Big Five personality framework (Roberts, Chernyshenko, Stark, & Goldberg, 2005;Tangney et al., 2004) and associated with conformity in Schwartz' theory of basic values (Schwartz, 2012).”
From Relationships between functional food consumption and individual traits and values: A segmentation approach (2021) · cites this paper as Schwartz, 2012
In the citing paper
“The choices of individual domain-specific traits and values included in this study are both theoretically grounded in the personality and social psychology literature (McCrae & Costa, 1995;Rokeach, 1973;Schwartz, 2012) and are operationally robust in the assessment of constructs (e.g., Tangney et al., 2004).”
From Relationships between functional food consumption and individual traits and values: A segmentation approach (2021) · cites this paper as Schwartz, 2012
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF RELIGIOUS LIFE
Durkheim, É., & Swain, J. W. (1916) · AJN American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3405938 · Cited by 10,708
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
(1951) · Cited by 8,693
Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?
Schwartz, S. H. (1994) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x · Cited by 6,122
Conflict, arousal, and curiosity.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11164-000 · Cited by 6,018
International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
Duncan, O. D., & Sills, D. L. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092889 · Cited by 3,486
Pattern and growth in personality
Allport, G. W. (1961) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,361
Refining the theory of basic individual values.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., et al. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029393 · Cited by 2,962
Cited by
Sorted by citations
PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework
OECD (2019) · Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie · doi:10.1787/b25efab8-en · Cited by 2,216
Global Evidence on Economic Preferences*
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjy013 · Cited by 1,724
The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing.
Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016) · International Journal of Wellbeing · doi:10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526 · Cited by 1,485
Human capital in social and commercial entrepreneurship
Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T. M., & Stephan, U. (2016) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.05.003 · Cited by 521
Teachers’ Self-Efficacy: The Role of Personal Values and Motivations for Teaching
Barni, D., Danioni, F., & Benevene, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01645 · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Schwartz, Shalom H.
- ORCID
- Schwartz, Shalom H.
- Venue
- Online Readings in Psychology and Culture
- Published
- 2012-12-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2307-0919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986829999
- Cited by
- 4,147
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 391 · 2025: 491 · 2024: 438 · 2023: 475 · 2022: 437 · 2021: 437 · 2020: 418 · 2019: 355 · 2018: 226 · 2017: 184 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 101 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 11
- FWCI
- 76.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Online Readings in Psychology and Culture (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ScholarWorks - GVSU (Grand Valley State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- basic human values, cross-cultural universality, Schwartz Value Survey, Portrait Values Questionnaire, value priorities, value hierarchy, value measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
