Cited by 23Psychedelics and Drug StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Psilocybin, an Effective Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder in Adults - A Systematic Review

Open access
Watford, Tessa, Masood, Naqash·2024·Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience

Abstract

Psilocybin is a classical psychedelic which has been utilised for healing purposes for millenia. However, with its classification as a Schedule I substance, research into this compound is scarce with few FDA-approved clinical studies. Despite this, profound findings into its antidepressant effects (largely through its action on 5-HT1a receptors) in mental illnesses such as major depressive disorder have rapidly increased interest back into their potential therapeutic benefits. This systematic review provides an analysis of the studies examining the clinical use of psilocybin for major depressive disorder. In total 6 studies were selected, including 319 participants, with half being randomised controlled trials and half open label trials. In every study psychological support was included as an integral part of the treatment. It was found that every study significantly favoured the use of psilocybin in reducing depressive symptoms, with few side effects. This gives psilocybin an advantage over commonly prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which carry more risk and cause more adverse effects. This drug therefore shows promise for being used as a clinical treatment for major depressive disorder, however future research should develop a paradigm for its use, with the timing of sessions and type of psychological support specified to allow for more precise analysis of the clinical effects of the drug. Additionally, more studies into its clinical efficacy are needed for appropriate detection of any publication bias. With this, psilocybin could prove to be revolutionary in treating depression and become an alternative medication to SSRIs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9758/cpn.23.1120

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to a recent meta-analysis, use of psilocybin (at doses ranging from 1 mg to 25 mg) in patients not currently taking any other psychotropic medications resulted in significant reductions in depressive symptoms.

    “According to a recent meta-analysis, which included three RCTs and three open-label studies, the use of psilocybin (at doses ranging from 1 mg to 25 mg) to patients not currently taking any other psychotropic medications resulted in significant reductions in depressive symptoms. 38”

    From The revival of psilocybin between scientific excitement, evidence of efficacy, and real-world challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Methods exclude participants currently taking other psychotropic medications, and the Results report significant reductions in depressive symptoms. Although the Included Studies and Trials Characteristics section gives a study-dose range of 1–25 mg, the main analysis used medium-to-high doses; the Primary Outcomes section says the 1 mg and 10 mg doses produced non-significant clinical responses. The claim therefore overstates the finding if it implies significant benefit across the stated dose range. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watford, T., & Masood, N.
Affiliations
Keele University (GB)
Corresponding author
Watford, Tessa
Venue
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience
Published
2023-10-16
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
2-12
ISSN
  • 1738-1088 (ISSN-L)
  • 2093-4327
OpenAlex
W4387651512
Cited by
23
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Keele University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
psilocybin, major depressive disorder, antidepressant effects, 5-HT1A receptor, classical psychedelics, Schedule I drug classification, psychological support, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, adverse effects, treatment efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review