Cited by 101Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Adaptation of the Self-Compassion Scale for use in Brazil: Evidences of construct validity

Open access
Souza, Luciana Karine, Hutz, Claudio Simon·2016·Temas em Psicologia

Abstract

This study reports evidences of adaptation, construct validation, and reliability of the Self-Compassion Scale for use in Brazil.Self-compassion is a positive healthy attitude towards the self when facing suffering and diffi culties.It encompasses self-kindness instead of self-judgment, mindfulness instead of over-identifi cation, and common humanity instead of social isolation.A confi rmatory factor analysis endorsed the six-factor structure (six subscales) of the original scale; adequate polychoric correlations were identifi ed among subscales; a higher-order factor was confi rmed via hierarchical model analysis; and internal consistency was .92.The scale is ready for application on Brazilian samples in continuing validation studies, for example, with available measures of social desirability, self-esteem, depression, and anxiety, as well as with similar constructs, such as self-acceptance, mindfulness, emotional selfregulation, and self-judgment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9788/tp2016.1-11

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fontinha, J. (2009). "Faz a ti mesmo aquilo que far- ias aos outros": Estilo de vinculação como de- terminante da compaixão e auto-compaixão [Do to yourself what you´d do to others: Attachment style as a determinant of compassion and self- compassion]. (Master´s thesis). Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Souza, L. K., & Hutz, C. S.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Venue
Temas em Psicologia
Published
2016
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
159-172
ISSN
1413-389X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2340581068
Cited by
101
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Temas em Psicologia (publishedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
self-compassion, Self-Compassion Scale, scale adaptation, construct validity, Brazilian adaptation, psychometric validation, self-kindness, mindfulness, common humanity, self-judgment, over-identification, social isolation, higher-order factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review