Cited by 531Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCultural Differences and ValuesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Self-Compassion and Self-Construal in the United States, Thailand, and Taiwan

Neff, Kristin D., Pisitsungkagarn, Kullaya, Hsieh, Ya-Ping·2008·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Abstract

Self-compassion is a self-attitude construct derived from Buddhist psychology (Neff, 2003a). It entails being kind rather than harshly critical toward oneself, perceiving one's experiences as part of the larger human experience, and holding painful feelings in mindful awareness. Given that self-compassion is an Asian construct, this study compares self-compassion levels in the United States, Thailand, and Taiwan. Results indicate that self-compassion is highest in Thailand and lowest in Taiwan, with the United States falling in between. Interdependence is linked to self-compassion in Thailand only, whereas independence is linked to self-compassion in Taiwan and the United States. Results suggest that self-compassion levels in these societies are linked to specific cultural features rather than general East—West differences. However, self-compassion is significantly associated with well-being in all three cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022022108314544

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neff, K. D., Pisitsungkagarn, K., & Hsieh, Y.-P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
2008-02-07
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
267-285
ISSN
  • 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5422
OpenAlex
W2172179106
Cited by
531
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
self-compassion, self-construal, interdependence, independence, cross-cultural comparison, Buddhist psychology, well-being, East-West differences, Thailand, Taiwan, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review