Most cited decision sciences papers
- Verified
Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview
Pieper, D., Antoine, S.-L., Mathes, T., Neugebauer, E. A. M., & Eikermann, M. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Cited by 1,318
- Verified
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementation
Cited by 1,313
- Verified
An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity
Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022) · Organizational Research Methods
Psychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in Measurement
Cited by 1,309
- Verified
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists
Moher, D., Jadad, A. R., Nichol, G., Penman, M., Tugwell, P., & Walsh, S. (1995) · Controlled Clinical Trials
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Cited by 1,308
- Verified
Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998) · Multivariate Behavioral Research
Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Cited by 1,307
- Verified
Toward Robust Information: Data Quality and Inter-Rater Reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
Shiloach, M., Frencher, S. K., Steeger, J. E., Rowell, K. S., Bartzokis, K., Tomeh, M. G., Richards, K. E., Ko, C. Y., & Hall, B. L. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementHealthcare Quality and Management
Cited by 1,306
- Verified
Direct and Indirect Effects: Classical and Bootstrap Estimates of Variability
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1990) · Sociological Methodology
Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Cited by 1,305
- Verified
The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development
Gagnier, J. J., Kienle, G., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Sox, H., & Riley, D. (2013) · Global Advances in Health and Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Writing and Publishing
Cited by 1,305
- Verified
Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: A comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36)
Strand, B. H., Dalgard, O. S., Tambs, K., & Rognerud, M. (2003) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Cited by 1,304
- Verified
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making
Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology
Cited by 1,302
- Verified
Data quality in context
Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (1997) · Communications of the ACM
Data Quality and ManagementBig Data and Business Intelligence
Cited by 1,298
- Verified
Regret Analysis of Stochastic and Nonstochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problems
Bubeck, S., & Cesa-Bianchi, N. (2012) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
Advanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchReinforcement Learning in Robotics
Cited by 1,295
- Verified
How Many Studies Do You Need?: A Primer on Statistical Power for Meta-Analysis
Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 1,294
- Verified
What does research reproducibility mean?
Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016) · Science Translational Medicine
Scientific Computing and Data ManagementAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Cited by 1,293
- Verified
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics
Cited by 1,293
- Verified
Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences
Thornton, A. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 1,291
- Verified
The Development of a Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale
de Jong-Gierveld, J., & Kamphuls, F. (1985) · Applied Psychological Measurement
Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment
Cited by 1,291
- Verified
Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions
Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986) · New Directions for Program Evaluation
Efficiency Analysis Using DEASports Analytics and Performance
Cited by 1,288
- Verified
An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods
Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies
Cited by 1,288
- Verified
Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead
Rücker, G., Schwarzer, G., Carpenter, J. R., & Schumacher, M. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 1,287
- Verified
A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis
Macaskill, P., Walter, S. D., & Irwig, L. (2001) · Statistics in Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 1,286
- Verified
A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations
Blais, A.-R., & Weber, E. U. (2006) · Judgment and Decision Making
Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsRisk Perception and Management
Cited by 1,286
- Verified
Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions
Kraft, M. (2019) · Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsEvaluation and Performance Assessment
Cited by 1,286
- Verified
THE FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM REVISITED: A GENERAL WEIGHTED METHOD FOR CALCULATING FAIL-SAFE NUMBERS IN META-ANALYSIS
Rosenberg, M. S. (2005) · Evolution
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Cited by 1,285
Go further with a free account
Verify every reference, keep papers in a library, and ask questions across them.
Sign up - it is free