Cited by 40Skin Protection and AgingNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studiesmelanin and skin pigmentation

Sunscreen applied at ≥ 2 mg cm −2 during a sunny holiday prevents erythema, a biomarker of ultraviolet radiation‐induced DNA damage and suppression of acquired immunity

Open access
Narbutt, J., Philipsen, P.A., Harrison, G.I., Morgan, K.A., Lawrence, K.P., Baczynska, K.A., Grys, K., Rogowski‐Tylman, M. +7 more·2019·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Sun protection factor (SPF) is assessed with sunscreen applied at 2 mg cm−2. People typically apply around 0·8 mg cm−2 and use sunscreen daily for holidays. Such use results in erythema, which is a risk factor for skin cancer. To determine (i) whether typical sunscreen use resulted in erythema, epidermal DNA damage and photoimmunosuppression during a sunny holiday, (ii) whether optimal sunscreen use inhibited erythema and (iii) whether erythema is a biomarker for photoimmunosuppression in a laboratory study. Holidaymakers (n = 22) spent a week in Tenerife (very high ultraviolet index) using their own sunscreens without instruction (typical sunscreen use). Others (n = 40) were given SPF 15 sunscreens with instructions on how to achieve the labelled SPF (sunscreen intervention). Personal ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure was monitored electronically as the standard erythemal dose (SED) and erythema was quantified. Epidermal cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) were determined by immunostaining, and immunosuppression was assessed by contact hypersensitivity (CHS) response. There was no difference between personal UVR exposure in the typical sunscreen use and sunscreen intervention groups (P = 0·08). The former had daily erythema on five UVR‐exposed body sites, increased CPDs (P < 0·001) and complete CHS suppression (20 of 22). In comparison, erythema was virtually absent (P < 0·001) when sunscreens were used at ≥ 2 mg cm−2. A laboratory study showed that 3 SED from three very different spectra suppressed CHS by around ~50%. Optimal sunscreen use prevents erythema during a sunny holiday. Erythema predicts suppression of CHS (implying a shared action spectrum). Given that erythema and CPDs share action spectra, the data strongly suggest that optimal sunscreen use will also reduce CPD formation and UVR‐induced immunosuppression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjd.17277

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DNA damage can be repaired by photolytic enzymes, while UV-induced skin DNA damage can be prevented by applying sunscreen.

    “DNA damage can be repaired by photolytic enzymes, while UV-induced skin DNA damage can be prevented by applying sunscreen [36,37].”

    From Diet and Skin Aging—From the Perspective of Food Nutrition (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brash DE. UV signature mutations. Photochem Photobiol 2015; 91:15- 26.
  2. Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1916; 17:863-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Narbutt, J., Philipsen, P. A., Harrison, G. I., Morgan, K. A., Lawrence, K. P., Baczynska, K. A., Grys, K., Rogowski‐Tylman, M., Olejniczak‐Staruch, I., Tewari, A., Bell, M., O'Connor, C., Wulf, H. C., Lesiak, A., & Young, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Chilton, Didcot OX11 0RQ U.K.
  • Dermoklinika Centrum Medyczne Łódź 90‐436 Poland
  • Walgreens Boots Alliance (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Young, A.R.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2018-12-05
Volume
180
Issue
3
Pages
604-614
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2896044068
Cited by
40
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
FP7 Environment (227020)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
sunscreen use, erythema, ultraviolet radiation, sun protection factor, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, photoimmunosuppression, contact hypersensitivity, skin cancer risk, action spectrum
MeSH terms
Adult, DNA Damage, Erythema, Female, Holidays, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Male, Middle Aged, Skin Neoplasms, Spain, Sunlight, Sunscreening Agents, Adaptive Immunity, Sun Protection Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review