Cited by 10Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsDrug-Induced Ocular ToxicityRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Medication Use and the 5-Year Incidence of Early Age-Related Maculopathy: The Beaver Dam Eye Study

Open access
Klein, Ronald·2001·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate incident early age-related maculopathy (ARM) after a 5-year interval with respect to medication use. Design Population-based incidence study. Setting Participants were adults aged 43 to 86 years living in Beaver Dam, Wis, when first examined in 1988-1990 (n = 4926); they were reexamined in 1993-1995(n = 3684). Methods All participants were examined and interviewed and stereoscopic color fundus photographs were taken. All procedures were done by standard protocol at both examinations. Incidence of ARM was based on grading using the Wisconsin ARM Grading System. All prescribed and over-the-counter medications in current use were brought to the examination site and the names were recorded at that time. Results There were 678 drug preparations (active ingredients) being used at the baseline examination. No relations were found between most antihypertensive drugs, most central nervous system medications, aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, estrogens, lipid-lowering agents, and incident early ARM over the 5-year period. Age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression analyses suggested possible associations (P<.10) between the use of phenothiazine antidopaminergics (odds ratio [OR], 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-8.23;P= .06), desiccated thyroid hormones (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 0.89-6.07;P= .09), and calcium channel blockers (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.93-3.12;P= .08) with incident ARM. When additional information on past use was included in the regression model, the association remained for calcium channel blockers, but not for phenothiazines and desiccated thyroid hormones. A lower incidence of early ARM occurred in those who took antidepressants(OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.94;P= .04) at the baseline examination. Conclusion Although many different medications were being used at the baseline examination in the Beaver Dam Eye Study cohort, there were no striking associations with the 5-year incidence of early ARM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.119.9.1354

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results from the Beaver Dam Study suggest that people who spent leisure time outdoors were at an increased risk of developing early age-related macular degeneration.

    “Results from the Beaver Dam Study suggest that people who spent leisure time outdoors were at an increased risk of developing early age-related macular de generation.113”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [113]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Tielsch JA. Vision problems in the US: a report on blindness and vision impair- ment in adults age 40 and older. Prevent Blindness America. Schaumburg, Ill: Prevent Blindness Inc; 1995:1-20.
  2. Eagle RJ. Mechanism of maculopathy. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:613-625.
  3. Friedman E. Pathogenesis: a hemodynamic model. In: Berger JW, Fine SL, Maguire MG, eds. Age-Related Macular Degeneration. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1999:173-178.
  4. Klein R. Epidemiology. In: Berger JW, Fine SL, Maguire MG, eds. Age-Related Macular Degeneration. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1999:31-56.
  5. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. Risk factors associated with age-related macular degeneration: a case-control study in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS Report No. 3). Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2224-2232.
  6. Zinn KM, Marmor MF. Toxicology of the human retinal pigment epithelium. In: Zinn KM, Marmor MF, eds. The Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1979:395-412.
  7. Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Report 7: a modification of the Air- lie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981; 21:210-226.
  8. SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 8 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS In- stitute; 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Klein, Ronald
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
119
Issue
9
Pages
1354
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1528210742
Cited by
3
References
14
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (EY0-6594)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
age-related maculopathy, medication use, drug-induced maculopathy, phenothiazines, calcium channel blockers, antidepressants, antihypertensive drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, estrogen, lipid-lowering drugs, central nervous system drugs, incidence, Beaver Dam Eye Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review