Cited by 112Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Impact of a mentoring and skills group program on mental health outcomes for maltreated children in foster care

Open access
Taussig, Heather N., Culhane, Sara E.·2010·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the Fostering Healthy Futures program in reducing mental health problems and associated problems. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Denver metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 9 to 11 years who were maltreated and placed in foster care. INTERVENTION: Children in the control group (n=77) received an assessment of their cognitive, educational, and mental health functioning. Children in the intervention group (n=79) received the assessment and participated in a 9-month mentoring and skills group program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Children and caregivers were interviewed at baseline prior to randomization, immediately following the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention. Teachers were interviewed 2 times after baseline. Measures included a multi-informant index of mental health problems, youth-reported symptoms of posttraumatic stress, dissociation, and quality of life, and caregiver- and youth-reported use of mental health services and psychotropic medications. RESULTS: After adjusting for covariates, intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated that the treatment group had fewer mental health problems on a multi-informant factor 6 months after the intervention (mean difference, -0.51; 95% confidence interval, -0.84 to -0.19), reported fewer symptoms of dissociation 6 months after the intervention (mean difference, -3.66; 95% confidence interval, -6.58 to -0.74), and reported better quality of life immediately following the intervention (mean difference, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.19). Fewer youths in the intervention group than in the control group had received recent mental health therapy 6 months after the intervention according to youth report (53% vs 71%, respectively; relative risk=0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: A 9-month mentoring and skills group intervention for children in foster care can be implemented with fidelity and high uptake rates, resulting in improved mental health outcomes. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00809315.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.124

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fostering Healthy Futures evaluations showed evidence of fewer dissociative symptoms at 6-month follow-up (d = −0.29, 95% CI [−0.50, −0.09] in the 2010 evaluation).

    “with evidence of fewer dissociative symptoms at 6-month follow up in a 2010 (d = −0.29, 95% CI [−0.50, −0.09]) and a linked 2019 evaluation of Fostering Healthy Futures (Taussig & Culhane, 2010; Taussig et al., 2019)”

    From Effectiveness of Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions for Children and Young People in Foster, Kinship, and Residential Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Taussig & Culhane, 2010

    The Results > Outcome Analyses report fewer dissociative symptoms among intervention youth at T3, which the Abstract > Main Outcome Measures identifies as six months post-intervention. The paper gives a mean difference of −3.66 (95% CI, −6.58 to −0.74), not the cited standardized effect size of d = −0.29 (95% CI, −0.50 to −0.09); those exact d values are not established by the passages in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two quantitative studies found that mentored young people in foster care manifested improved social skills, mental health, quality of life, and greater trust in others than did foster care boys and girls in control groups, but mentees in foster care had shorter matches than mentees not in foster care.

    “Although two quantitative studies have found that mentored young people in foster care manifested improved social skills, mental health, quality of life, social skills, and greater trust in others than did foster care boys and girls in control groups [147,148,149] found that mentees in foster care had shorter matches than mentees not in foster care.”

    From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [148]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three evaluations of two interventions assessed quality of life with child-reported measures at short and long-term follow-up.

    “Three evaluations of two interventions assessed quality of life with child-reported measures at short and long-term follow-up (Crespo et al., 2020; Taussig & Culhane, 2010; Taussig et al., 2019).”
  • Certain targeted, time-limited mentoring programs have been shown to yield positive youth outcomes.

    “In fact, provided that there is suf fi cient opportunity to forge a productive bond, certain targeted, time-limited mentoring programs have been shown to yield positive youth outcomes (Cavell and Elledge 2014; Taussig and Culhane 2010).”

    From The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs: A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies (2019) · cites this paper as Taussig and Culhane 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Berliner L Kolko D Kluger MP Alexander G Curtis PA What works in treatment for abused children What works in child welfare 2000 Washington, DC CWLA Press 97 104
  2. [40]McCord J McCord J Tremblay RE A pioneering longitudinal experimental study of delinquency prevention Preventing antisocial behavior: interventions from birth through adolescence 1992 xv New York Guilford Press 391

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taussig, H. N., & Culhane, S. E.
Affiliations
Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2010-08-01
Volume
164
Issue
8
Pages
739-46
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145758062
Cited by
112
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Pioneer Fund
  • Daniels Fund
  • Kempe Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH01972, 1 K01 MH01972, R21MH067618, R01MH076919, K01MH001972)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
child abuse, foster care, mentoring, child mental health, dissociation, post-traumatic stress, quality of life, mental health service utilization, psychotropic drug use, multi-informant assessment, children aged 9 to 11
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Mentors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review