Cited by 272Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCrime Patterns and Interventions

Improving youth mentoring interventions through research-based practice

Rhodes, Jean E.·2008·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Youth mentoring programs are in the limelight. Over three million young people have a Big Brother, a Big Sister, or a similar adult volunteer involved in their lives-a sixfold increase from just a decade ago-and generous federal funding continues to fuel new initiatives. This expansion speaks volumes about the faith our society places in one-on-one relationships between vulnerable young people and caring adults. But what do we know about the effectiveness of this intervention strategy? A better understanding of the research evidence for youth mentoring, including findings from reviews, evaluations, and meta-analyses, provides a basis for a more informed, practically applicable approach to strengthening youth mentoring interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10464-007-9153-9

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primary objectives and focus of an SBM program, student demographics, perspectives of teachers and mentors, and the specific context of the school-including its resources and existing programs-all play a role in determining the selection of the outcome domain.

    “The primary objectives and focus of an SBM program, student demographics, perspectives of teachers and mentors, and the specific context of the school-including its resources and existing programs-all play a role in determining the selection of the outcome domain (DuBois et al., 2011; Rhodes, 2008; Snyder et al., 1997).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhodes, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
Rhodes, Jean E.
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-20
Volume
41
Issue
1-2
Pages
35-42
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W2058255415
Cited by
272
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
youth mentoring, Big Brothers Big Sisters, one-on-one mentoring, intervention effectiveness, evidence-informed practice, program evaluation, meta-analysis, vulnerable youth, adult volunteers
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Humans, Mentors, Social Support, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review