Cited by 321Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Relapse after recovery from unipolar depression: a critical review

Belsher, Gayle, Costello, Charles G.·1988·Psychological Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.84

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belsher, G., & Costello, C. G.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1988
Volume
104
Issue
1
Pages
84-96
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2046077806
Cited by
321
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, relapse, remission, depression recurrence, recovery from depression
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Humans, Recurrence, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review