Cited by 1,763Innovations in Medical EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changing Physician Performance: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Continuing Medical Education Strategies

Davis, David A.·1995·JAMA

Abstract

Objective. —To review the literature relating to the effectiveness of education strategies designed to change physician performance and health care outcomes. Data Sources. —We searched MEDLINE, ERIC, NTIS, the Research and Development Resource Base in Continuing Medical Education, and other relevant data sources from 1975 to 1994, usingcontinuing medical education(CME) and related terms as keywords. We manually searched journals and the bibliographies of other review articles and called on the opinions of recognized experts. Study Selection. —We reviewed studies that met the following criteria: randomized controlled trials of education strategies or interventions that objectively assessed physician performance and/or health care outcomes. These intervention strategies included (alone and in combination) educational materials, formal CME activities, outreach visits such as academic detailing, opinion leaders, patient-mediated strategies, audit with feedback, and reminders. Studies were selected only if more than 50% of the subjects were either practicing physicians or medical residents. Data Extraction. —We extracted the specialty of the physicians targeted by the interventions and the clinical domain and setting of the trial. We also determined the details of the educational intervention, the extent to which needs or barriers to change had been ascertained prior to the intervention, and the main outcome measure(s). Data Synthesis. —We found 99 trials, containing 160 interventions, that met our criteria. Almost two thirds of the interventions (101 of 160) displayed an improvement in at least one major outcome measure: 70% demonstrated a change in physician performance, and 48% of interventions aimed at health care outcomes produced a positive change. Effective change strategies included reminders, patient-mediated interventions, outreach visits, opinion leaders, and multifaceted activities. Audit with feedback and educational materials were less effective, and formal CME conferences or activities, without enabling or practice-reinforcing strategies, had relatively little impact. Conclusion. —Widely used CME delivery methods such as conferences have little direct impact on improving professional practice. More effective methods such as systematic practice-based interventions and outreach visits are seldom used by CME providers. (JAMA. 1995;274:700-705)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1995.03530090032018

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Davis, D. A.
Corresponding author
Davis, David A.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1995-09-06
Volume
274
Issue
9
Pages
700
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4249753019
Cited by
1,763
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 60
FWCI
69.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
continuing medical education, physician performance, health care outcomes, educational intervention, academic detailing, opinion leaders, reminders, teaching materials, practice-based interventions, multicomponent intervention, barriers to change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review