Cited by 154Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackReflective Practices in Education

Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance.

Sargeant, Joan, Eva, Kevin W, Armson, Heather, Chesluk, Ben, Dornan, Tim, Holmboe, Eric, Lockyer, Jocelyn M, Loney, Elaine +2 more·2011·Medical Education

Abstract

CONTEXT: Conceptualisations of self-assessment are changing as its role in professional development comes to be viewed more broadly as needing to be both externally and internally informed through activities that enable access to and the interpretation and integration of data from external sources. Education programmes use various activities to promote learners' reflection and self-direction, yet we know little about how effective these activities are in 'informing' learners' self-assessments. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to increase understanding of the specific ways in which undergraduate and postgraduate learners used learning and assessment activities to inform self-assessments of their clinical performance. METHODS: We conducted an international qualitative study using focus groups and drawing on principles of grounded theory. We recruited volunteer participants from three undergraduate and two postgraduate programmes using structured self-assessment activities (e.g. portfolios). We asked learners to describe their perceptions of and experiences with formal and informal activities intended to inform self-assessment. We conducted analysis as a team using a constant comparative process. RESULTS: Eighty-five learners (53 undergraduate, 32 postgraduate) participated in 10 focus groups. Two main findings emerged. Firstly, the perceived effectiveness of formal and informal assessment activities in informing self-assessment appeared to be both person- and context-specific. No curricular activities were considered to be generally effective or ineffective. However, the availability of high-quality performance data and standards was thought to increase the effectiveness of an activity in informing self-assessment. Secondly, the fostering and informing of self-assessment was believed to require credible and engaged supervisors. CONCLUSIONS: Several contextual and personal conditions consistently influenced learners' perceptions of the extent to which assessment activities were useful in informing self-assessments of performance. Although learners are not guaranteed to be accurate in their perceptions of which factors influence their efforts to improve performance, their perceptions must be taken into account; assessment strategies that are perceived as providing untrustworthy information can be anticipated to have negligible impact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03888.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sargeant, J., Eva, K. W., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J. M., Loney, E., Mann, K. V., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • American Board of Internal Medicine (US)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Sargeant, Joan
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-12
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
636-647
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W1798468849
Cited by
154
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
Keywords
self-assessment, clinical performance, learner perceptions, assessment activities, reflective practice, self-directed learning, portfolios, performance data, undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, professional development
MeSH terms
Belgium, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Graduate, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, United Kingdom, Humans, Netherlands, Self-Assessment, Self-Evaluation Programs, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review