Cited by 614Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac Health and Mental Health

Long-term Outcomes in Individuals With Prolonged PR Interval or First-Degree Atrioventricular Block

Open access
Cheng, Susan·2009·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Prolongation of the electrocardiographic PR interval, known as first-degree atrioventricular block when the PR interval exceeds 200 milliseconds, is frequently encountered in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical significance of PR prolongation in ambulatory individuals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, community-based cohort including 7575 individuals from the Framingham Heart Study (mean age, 47 years; 54% women) who underwent routine 12-lead electrocardiography. The study cohort underwent prospective follow-up through 2007 from baseline examinations in 1968-1974. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations of PR interval with the incidence of arrhythmic events and death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident atrial fibrillation (AF), pacemaker implantation, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: During follow-up, 481 participants developed AF, 124 required pacemaker implantation, and 1739 died. At the baseline examination, 124 individuals had PR intervals longer than 200 milliseconds. For those with PR intervals longer than 200 milliseconds compared with those with PR intervals of 200 milliseconds or shorter, incidence rates per 10 000 person-years were 140 (95% confidence interval [CI], 95-208) vs 36 (95% CI, 32-39) for AF, 59 (95% CI, 40-87) vs 6 (95% CI, 5-7) for pacemaker implantation, and 334 (95% CI, 260-428) vs 129 (95% CI, 123-135) for all-cause mortality. Corresponding absolute risk increases were 1.04% (AF), 0.53% (pacemaker implantation), and 2.05% (all-cause mortality) per year. In multivariable analyses, each 20-millisecond increment in PR was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P = .02) for AF, 1.22 (95% CI, 1.14-1.30; P < .001) for pacemaker implantation, and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.02-1.13; P = .005) for all-cause mortality. Individuals with first-degree atrioventricular block had a 2-fold adjusted risk of AF (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.36-3.12; P < .001), 3-fold adjusted risk of pacemaker implantation (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.83-4.57; P < .001), and 1.4-fold adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.44, 95% CI, 1.09-1.91; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Prolongation of the PR interval is associated with increased risks of AF, pacemaker implantation, and all-cause mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2009.888

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The bulk of studies evaluating sex differences in the AF-related risk of heart failure have showed no significant difference; however, a few studies have suggested higher risk in women.

    “The bulk of studies evaluating sex differences in the AF-related risk of HF have showed no significant difference; however, a few studies have suggested higher risk in women (Supplementary Table S8).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, S.
Affiliations
Framingham Heart Study (US)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Susan
Venue
JAMA
Published
2009-06-24
Volume
301
Issue
24
Pages
2571
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2047422067
Cited by
614
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 39
FWCI
22.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1, N01-HC 25195)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01‐HC25195, K24HL004334, N01-HC-025195)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
PR interval prolongation, first-degree atrioventricular block, atrial fibrillation, pacemaker implantation, all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events, long-term outcomes, ambulatory adults, Framingham Heart Study, risk stratification, atrioventricular conduction delay, atrioventricular nodal block, atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Cause of Death, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Pacemaker, Artificial, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Disease Progression, Atrioventricular Block

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review