Cited by 170Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Predictors for atrial fibrillation detection after cryptogenic stroke: Results from CRYSTAL AF

Open access
Thijs, Vincent N., Brachmann, Johannes, Morillo, Carlos A., Passman, Rod S., Sanna, Tommaso, Bernstein, Richard A., Diener, Hans-Christoph, Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo +5 more·2016·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF) in cryptogenic stroke (CS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients who received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). METHODS: We studied patients with CS/TIA who were randomized to ICM within the CRYSTAL AF study. We assessed whether age, sex, race, body mass index, type and severity of index ischemic event, CHADS2 score, PR interval, and presence of diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, or patent foramen ovale and premature atrial contractions predicted AF development within the initial 12 and 36 months of follow-up using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 221 patients randomized to ICM (age 61.6 ± 11.4 years, 64% male), AF episodes were detected in 29 patients within 12 months and 42 patients at 36 months. Significant univariate predictors of AF at 12 months included age (hazard ratio [HR] per decade 2.0 [95% confidence interval 1.4-2.8], p = 0.002), CHADS2 score (HR 1.9 per one point [1.3-2.8], p = 0.008), PR interval (HR 1.3 per 10 milliseconds [1.2-1.4], p < 0.0001), premature atrial contractions (HR 3.9 for >123 vs 0 [1.3-12.0], p = 0.009 across quartiles), and diabetes (HR 2.3 [1.0-5.2], p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age (HR per decade 1.9 [1.3-2.8], p = 0.0009) and PR interval (HR 1.3 [1.2-1.4], p < 0.0001) remained significant and together yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (0.70-0.85). The same predictors were found at 36 months. CONCLUSION: Increasing age and a prolonged PR interval at enrollment were independently associated with an increased AF incidence in CS patients. However, they offered only moderate predictive ability in determining which CS patients had AF detected by the ICM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002282

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AF detection is more likely in patients with cryptogenic stroke implanted with loop recorders or who have had ECG monitors for several weeks.

    “AF detection is not uncommon in unselected stroke patients (6.2%, 95% CI 4.4-8.3),128 but is more likely in patients with cryptogenic stroke implanted with loop recorders or who have had ECG monitors for several weeks.18,128,152”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thijs, V. N., Brachmann, J., Morillo, C. A., Passman, R. S., Sanna, T., Bernstein, R. A., Diener, H.-C., Di Lazzaro, V., Rymer, M. M., Hogge, L., Rogers, T. B., Ziegler, P. D., & Assar, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU)
  • From the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and Austin Health Department of Neurology (V.N.T.), Heidelberg, Australia; Hospital Klinikum Coburg (J.B.), Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Coburg, Germany; Population Health Research Institute (C.A.M.), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (R.S.P.), Chicago, IL; Institute of Cardiology (T.S.), Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Davee Department of...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2016-01-19
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
261-269
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2215495516
Cited by
170
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Servier
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Allergan
  • Bayer Vital
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Biosense Webster
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, cryptogenic stroke, transient ischemic attack, implantable cardiac monitors, risk prediction, PR interval, age, CHADS2 score, premature atrial contractions, diabetes mellitus, patent foramen ovale
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Echocardiography, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Prognosis, Comorbidity, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review