Cited by 634Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

The Intention-to-Treat Principle: How to Assess the True Effect of Choosing a Medical Treatment

Detry, Michelle A., Lewis, Roger J.·2014·JAMA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2014.7523

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Detry, M. A., & Lewis, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2014-07-02
Volume
312
Issue
1
Pages
85
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1995980256
Cited by
634
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 22
FWCI
47.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
intention-to-treat analysis, clinical trial interpretation, treatment effect estimation, bias in clinical trials
MeSH terms
Anemia, Brain Injuries, Erythropoietin, Female, Hemoglobins, Humans, Male, Erythrocyte Transfusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review