Cited by 74Crime Patterns and InterventionsPolicing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The Philadelphia predictive policing experiment

Open access
Ratcliffe, Jerry H., Taylor, Ralph B., Askey, Amber Perenzin, Thomas, Kevin, Grasso, John, Bethel, Kevin J., Fisher, Ryan, Koehnlein, Josh·2021·Journal of Experimental Criminology

Abstract

Objectives: This place-based, randomized experiment explored the impact of different patrol strategies on violent and property crime in microscale predicted crime areas. The experiment aimed to learn whether different but operationally realistic police responses to crime forecasts, estimated by a predictive policing software program, could reduce crime. Methods: Twenty Philadelphia city districts were randomized to three interventions and one control condition. The three interventions comprised awareness districts (where officers were made aware of predicted areas on roll-call), marked car districts (where a marked patrol police car was dedicated to treatment areas), and unmarked car districts (a plain-clothes vehicle was dedicated to treatment areas). A business-as-usual approach represented the control condition in districts where staff had no access to the predictive software program. Two distinct 3-month phases examined crime outcomes for property and violent crime, respectively. Results: The marked car treatment showed substantial benefits for property crime (31% reduction in expected crime count), as well as temporal diffusion of benefits to the subsequent 8-h period (40% reduction in expected crime count). No other intervention demonstrated meaningful crime reduction. These reductions were probably not substantial enough to impact city or district-wide property crime. Some violent crime results ran contrary to expectations, but this happened in a context of extremely low crime counts in predicted areas. The small grid size areas hampered achieving statistical power. Conclusions: The experiment found reductions in property crime resulting from the marked car focused patrols. It also demonstrated the real-world challenges of estimating and preventing crime in small areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11292-019-09400-2

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Widening the scale of treatment areas may make patrol officers' activities less monotonous and reduce the likelihood of boundary violations, but it could also lead to net-widening effects and pose challenges to police legitimacy.

    “However, while widening the scale of treatment areas may make patrol officers' activities less monotonous and reduce the likelihood of boundary violations, it could also lead to net-widening effects and pose challenges to police legitimacy (Ratcliffe et al., 2021;Taylor & Ratcliffe, 2020).”

    From ‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing (2024) · cites this paper as Ratcliffe et al., 2021

    The Background (page unavailable) says officers could not realistically patrol only the small mission grids and had to drive outside them; the Discussion (page unavailable) says the authors expanded the analytical areas to reflect policing on the ground. This supports the boundary-related rationale for a larger area, but the paper does not say that widening patrol areas would reduce monotony or boundary violations, or that it would cause net-widening effects or challenges to police legitimacy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Assessing data quality is crucial to mitigate biases in the data, as biased data can lead to feedback loops and unreliable crime predictions.

    “It is crucial to assess data quality in order to mitigate biases in the data, as biased data can lead to feedback loops and unreliable crime predictions (Hunt et al., 2014;Mohler et al., 2016;Ratcliffe et al., 2021).”

    From ‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing (2024) · cites this paper as Ratcliffe et al., 2021

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says inaccuracies in property-crime reporting prevented the authors from using a preferred analytical approach, showing that data quality affected this study. It does not say that assessing data quality mitigates bias, or that biased data creates feedback loops and unreliable crime predictions. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In place-based predictive policing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), focusing on larger mission areas rather than micro-scaled intervention areas has been proposed as a more appropriate approach.

    “In place-based predictive policing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), focusing on larger mission areas rather than micro-scaled intervention areas has been proposed as a more appropriate approach (Ratcliffe et al., 2021;Taylor & Ratcliffe, 2019).”

    From ‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing (2024) · cites this paper as Ratcliffe et al., 2021

    The Background section (‘From mission grids to treatment areas as the unit of analysis’; page unavailable) says that analysing the mission grids alone did not reflect where officers actually patrolled, so the authors included adjacent cells in a larger treatment area. The Discussion also cautions that very small areas create prediction and statistical-power problems. The paper supports using larger areas for analysis, but does not propose replacing microscale mission grids with larger mission areas for the intervention. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Larger sample sizes are generally thought to increase statistical power to detect significant differences between treatment and control groups.

    “One factor is sample size, with larger sample sizes generally thought to increase statistical power to detect significant differences between treatment and control groups (Ratcliffe et al., 2021;Taylor & Ratcliffe, 2019).”

    From ‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing (2024) · cites this paper as Ratcliffe et al., 2021

    The Results say that small grid areas hampered statistical power, and the Discussion links low crime counts at fine spatial and temporal scales to reduced power. This supports the concern that sparse data can make treatment effects harder to detect, but the paper does not state the broader claim that increasing sample size generally increases power to detect treatment–control differences. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cooperation and deliberation play a crucial role in mitigating treatment integrity failures.

    “As mentioned earlier, cooperation and deliberation play a crucial role in mitigating treatment integrity failures (Ariel et al., 2020;Caplan et al., 2021;Ratcliffe et al., 2021;Santos & Santos, 2016).”

    From ‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing (2024) · cites this paper as Ratcliffe et al., 2021

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says the experiment was designed in close collaboration with the police department to make the treatments sustainable. The Background (page unavailable) also says the experiment was widely discussed to achieve buy-in. Neither passage establishes that cooperation and deliberation played a crucial role in mitigating treatment-integrity failures; the Discussion reports that operational constraints still prevented complete implementation. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

18 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ratcliffe, J. H., Taylor, R. B., Askey, A. P., Thomas, K., Grasso, J., Bethel, K. J., Fisher, R., & Koehnlein, J.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • Deloitte (United States) (US)
  • School District of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Ratcliffe, Jerry H.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2020-01-09
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
15-41
ISSN
  • 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3750
OpenAlex
W2999598339
Cited by
74
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
12.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Justice (2014-R2-CX-0002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
predictive policing, crime prediction, property crime, violent crime, crime diffusion, randomized experiments, Philadelphia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review