The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 24 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Weight loss improves cardiometabolic risk factors in people with overweight or obesity. Intensive lifestyle intervention and pharmacotherapy are the most effective noninvasive weight loss approaches. Objective: To compare the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg vs placebo for weight management as an adjunct to intensive behavioral therapy with initial low-calorie diet in adults with overweight or obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 68-week, phase 3a study (STEP 3) conducted at 41 sites in the US from August 2018 to April 2020 in adults without diabetes (N = 611) and with either overweight (body mass index ≥27) plus at least 1 comorbidity or obesity (body mass index ≥30). Interventions: Participants were randomized (2:1) to semaglutide, 2.4 mg (n = 407) or placebo (n = 204), both combined with a low-calorie diet for the first 8 weeks and intensive behavioral therapy (ie, 30 counseling visits) during 68 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The co-primary end points were percentage change in body weight and the loss of 5% or more of baseline weight by week 68. Confirmatory secondary end points included losses of at least 10% or 15% of baseline weight. Results: Of 611 randomized participants (495 women [81.0%], mean age 46 years [SD, 13], body weight 105.8 kg [SD, 22.9], and body mass index 38.0 [SD, 6.7]), 567 (92.8%) completed the trial, and 505 (82.7%) were receiving treatment at trial end. At week 68, the estimated mean body weight change from baseline was -16.0% for semaglutide vs -5.7% for placebo (difference, -10.3 percentage points [95% CI, -12.0 to -8.6]; P < .001). More participants treated with semaglutide vs placebo lost at least 5% of baseline body weight (86.6% vs 47.6%, respectively; P < .001). A higher proportion of participants in the semaglutide vs placebo group achieved weight losses of at least 10% or 15% (75.3% vs 27.0% and 55.8% vs 13.2%, respectively; P < .001). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with semaglutide (82.8%) vs placebo (63.2%). Treatment was discontinued owing to these events in 3.4% of semaglutide participants vs 0% of placebo participants. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with overweight or obesity, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide compared with placebo, used as an adjunct to intensive behavioral therapy and initial low-calorie diet, resulted in significantly greater weight loss during 68 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the durability of these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03611582.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
56 Own result · 17 Own method · 4 Own interpretation · 3 Supported · 3 Partly supported · 3 Sources not found · 3 No full text of the sources · 2 Not checked yet · 1 Supported so far · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The present findings suggest that the addition of semaglutide to intensive behavioral therapy may help patients achieve more than the average 5% to 10% reduction in body weight typically produced by behavioral interventions at 6 to 12 months.1,21”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [1] 1. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Obesity Society. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society. Circulation. 2014;129(25)(suppl 2):S102-S138. doi:10. 1161/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee source
Section 3.4.2 (ES2a–ES2b) says comprehensive lifestyle interventions can produce average losses approximating 5%–10% of initial weight at 6 months, with comparable average losses at 1 year. The semaglutide comparison is framed as the citing authors’ interpretation of their present findings, not as a finding attributed to this guideline. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [21] 21. Webb VL, Wadden TA. Intensive lifestyle intervention for obesity: principles, practices, and results. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(7):1752-1764. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.045 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At week 68, levels of C-reactive protein and lipids had improved with semaglutide relative to placebo, with the exception of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Table 2 and eTable 1 in Supplement 1).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Supportive Secondary End Points
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A higher proportion of participants in the semaglutide vs placebo group achieved weight losses of at least 10% or 15% (75.3% vs 27.0% and 55.8% vs 13.2%, respectively; P < .001).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A higher proportion of participants in the semaglutide vs placebo group achieved weight losses of at least 10% or 15% (75.3% vs 27.0% and 55.8% vs 13.2%, respectively; P < .001).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Semaglutide was associated with improvements vs placebo in BMI and diastolic blood pressure at week 68 (Table 2 and eTable 1 in Supplement 1).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Supportive Secondary End Points
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with semaglutide (82.8%) vs placebo (63.2%).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proportion of participants reporting adverse events was similar in the semaglutide and placebo groups (95.8% and 96.1%, respectively).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reductions at week 68 in waist circumference and systolic blood pressure were significantly greater with semaglutide than with placebo (difference, -8.3 cm [95% CI, -10.1 to -6.6]; P < .001and -3.9 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.4 to -1.5]; P = .001,respectively)”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Confirmatory Secondary End Points
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reductions at week 68 in waist circumference and systolic blood pressure were significantly greater with semaglutide than with placebo (difference, -8.3 cm [95% CI, -10.1 to -6.6]; P < .001and -3.9 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.4 to -1.5]; P = .001,respectively)”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Confirmatory Secondary End Points
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Semaglutide was associated with improvements vs placebo in BMI and diastolic blood pressure at week 68 (Table 2 and eTable 1 in Supplement 1).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Supportive Secondary End Points
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 29
- It may state two separate claims as one. 18
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Weight loss can be increased by an additional 3 to 5 percentage points by including a low-calorie (1000-1200 kcal/d) portion-controlled diet composed of liquid shakes, meal bars, and prepared meals.2,3”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > I
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [2] 2. Heymsfield SB, van Mierlo CA, van der Knaap HC, Heo M, Frier HI. Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(5):537-549. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo. 0802258 source
- Partly supportedcites [3] 3. Wadden TA, Foster GD, Sarwer DB, et al. Dieting and the development of eating disorders in obese women: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(3):560-568. doi:10.1093/ ajcn/80.3.560 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The weight-results passage (page unavailable) reports 12.1% weight loss in the meal-replacement group versus 7.8% with a conventional-food diet at week 20—an additional 4.3 percentage points in obese women. The Meal replacement section (page unavailable) describes a 1000 kcal/day plan of liquid servings and an evening meal, not a 1000–1200 kcal/day plan including meal bars; the difference in weight loss was no longer significant at week 40. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Once-daily liraglutide, 3.0 mg, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist approved for weight management, added approximately 3 to 5 percentage points of additional weight loss to intensive behavioral therapy compared with behavioral therapy alone.9,10”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > I
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] 9. Wadden TA, Walsh OA, Berkowitz RI, et al. Intensive behavioral therapy for obesity combined with liraglutide 3.0 mg: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019;27(1):75-86. doi: 10.1002/oby.22359 source
The Discussion reports that adding liraglutide 3.0 mg/day to intensive behavioral therapy increased mean one-year weight loss from 6.1% to 11.5% of initial weight. The difference is 5.4 percentage points, approximately the upper end of the claimed 3–5-point range. The Methods confirm once-daily administration. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [10] 10. Wadden TA, Tronieri JS, Sugimoto D, et al. Liraglutide 3.0 mg and intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) for obesity in primary care: the SCALE IBT randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020;28(3):529-536. doi:10.1002/oby.22726 source
The Results (Body weight) report 3.4 percentage points more weight loss at week 56 with liraglutide 3.0 mg plus IBT than with placebo plus IBT under the treatment-policy analysis. The corresponding difference under the if-all-adhered analysis was 4.6 percentage points. Both fall within the claimed approximate 3-to-5-point range. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A 20-week clinical study of participants with obe-sity found that treatment with once-weekly semaglutide, 2.4 mg, compared with placebo reduced self-reported hunger and food cravings and decreased energy intake during an ad libitum lunch by 35%.27”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [27] 27. Friedrichsen M, Breitschaft A, Tadayon S, Wizert A, Skovgaard D. The effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly on energy intake, appetite, control of eating, and gastric emptying in adults with obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(3):754- 762. doi:10.1111/dom.14280 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Larger-than-expected reductions in resting and nonresting energy expenditure that occur with weight loss (ie, metabolic adaptation), compensatory changes in other homeostatic regulators of body weight, and patients' behavioral fatigue in adhering to diet and activity recommendations may contribute to the 5% to 10% weight reduction plateau observed with behavioral therapy.[23][24][25]”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] 23. Leibel RL, Seeley RJ, Darsow T, Berg EG, Smith SR, Ratner R. Biologic responses to weight loss and weight regain: report from an American Diabetes Association research symposium. Diabetes. 2015; 64(7):2299-2309. doi:10.2337/db15-0004 source
- Partly supportedcites [24] 24. Heckman BW, Mathew AR, Carpenter MJ. Treatment burden and treatment fatigue as barriers to health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015;5:31-36. doi:10. 1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Chronic Disease and Health Behaviors section says treatment burden can reduce adherence to behavioral interventions, supporting the proposed role of behavioral fatigue. But Potential Applications says treatment fatigue had not been applied to obesity and does not link it to a 5%–10% weight-loss plateau. The paper does not address the sentence’s metabolic mechanisms, which appear alongside other citations. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [25] 25. Sumithran P, Prendergast LA, Delbridge E, et al. Long-term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(17):1597-1604. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1105816 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Preclinical studies suggest that weight loss with semaglutide results from its effects on glucagon-like peptide 1 receptors that mediate direct and indirect effects on the brain areas involved in regulation of appetite, including in the hypothalamus and hindbrain, ultimately leading to reduced energy intake.26”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [26] 26. Gabery S, Salinas CG, Paulsen SJ, et al. Semaglutide lowers body weight in rodents via distributed neural pathways. JCI Insight. 2020;5(6): e133429. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.133429 source
The Introduction says semaglutide interacts with neural GLP-1 receptors and directly and indirectly affects pathways involved in food intake. The Discussion concludes that it reduces body weight through direct effects in the hypothalamus and hindbrain and secondary effects elsewhere, with reduced food intake as the primary driver of weight loss. The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Two estimands were used to address different scientific questions, as described elsewhere.17,18”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Statistical Analysis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [17] 17. Food and Drug Administration. E9(R1) statistical principles for clinical trials: addendum: estimands and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials. Accessed October 22, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/media/ 108698/download
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites [18] 18. Wharton S, Astrup A, Endahl L, et al. Estimating and reporting treatment effects in clinical trials for weight management: using estimands to interpret effects of intercurrent events and missing data. Int J Obes (Lond). Published online January 18, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-00733-x source
The section on estimating treatment effects says that different scientific questions can be addressed by multiple estimands in one trial. It distinguishes the treatment policy estimand, which estimates a population-level effect, from the hypothetical or trial product estimand, which estimates a pharmacological effect assuming no intercurrent events. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At week 68, the estimated change in pulse from baseline was 3.1/min for semaglutide vs 2.1/min for placebo (trial product estimand difference, 1.0/min [95% CI, -0.7 to 2.6]) (eTable 2 in Supplement 1).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All randomized participants remained receiving randomized treatment for the duration of the trial and did not receive rescue intervention.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From baseline to week 68, SF-36 physical component summary score improved similarly in both groups, whereas the mental component summary score favored semaglutide (Table 2; eTable 1 and eFigure 7 in Supplement 1).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Supportive Secondary End Points
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At any given time during the study, the proportion of participants who experienced vomiting was less than 5% in both treatment groups.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proportion of participants experiencing nausea with semaglutide peaked at approximately 25% at week 20 and declined thereafter, remaining at approximately 15% for the duration of the study.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No deaths were reported during the study.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Malignant neoplasms were reported in 3 semaglutide-treated participants (0.7%; basal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, and papillary thyroid cancer) and 1 placebo-treated participant (0.5%; invasive lobular breast carcinoma).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
plainn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were no cases of acute pancreatitis, medullary thyroid carcinoma, or pancreatic cancer in either group.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the follow-up visit (week 75) after the offtreatment period, mean pulse had neared the baseline level.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From baseline to week 68, SF-36 physical component summary score improved similarly in both groups, whereas the mental component summary score favored semaglutide (Table 2; eTable 1 and eFigure 7 in Supplement 1).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Supportive Secondary End Points
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events in the semaglutide group (5.9%) compared with placebo (2.9%), mainly because of gastrointestinal events (Table 3).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SF-36 physical functioning score d | 2.4 | 1.6 | 0.8 (-0.2 to 1.9) | | .12”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Additional Contributions:
plainn = 407- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gastrointestinal disorders | 14 (3.4) | 20 | 3.8 | 0 | |”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Additional Contributions:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mental component summary score | -0.8 | -2.9 | 2.1 (0.5 to 3.6) | | .011”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Additional Contributions:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A sample size of 600 participants was calculated to provide power of 86% for the 7 end points in the hierarchic testing procedure, with greater than 99% power for the co-primary end points”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Statistical Analysis
plainn = 600- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“STEP 3 was a 68-week, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled, multicenter study conducted at 41 sites in the US from August 2018 to April 2020.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Study Design and Oversight
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Observed benefits of weight loss might have been larger if participants had been selected because of having elevated risk factors (eg, hypertension, hyperlipidemia), which they were not in the present study.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Larger weight losses (eg, ≥10%) are desired because they produce greater improvements in several obesityrelated cardiometabolic risk factors and diseases, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea.[4][5][6][7][8]”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > I
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4][5][6][7][8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants were randomized 2:1 with a blocking schema (block size of 9) via an interactive web-response system to onceweekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg, or visually identical placebo for 68 weeks”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Procedures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Subcutaneous semaglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes at once-weekly doses of up to 1.0 mg, 11 which reduces body weight by approximately 6% by 1 year in these patients.12,13”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > I
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [11] 11. Food and Drug Administration. Ozempic (semaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous use [prescribing information]. Accessed September 25, 2020. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_ docs/label/2020/209637s003lbl.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] 12. Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): a 56-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2): 258-266. doi:10.2337/dc17-0417 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [13] 13. Ahrén B, Masmiquel L, Kumar H, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin, thiazolidinediones, or both, in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56-week, double-blind, phase 3a, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(5):341-354. doi:10.1016/S2213- 8587(17)30092-X source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The larger proportions of participants treated with semaglutide compared with placebo who achieved categorical weight losses of at least 10%, 15%, or 20% translated into greater improvements in waist circumference, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin level, C-reactive protein level, and several lipid parameters.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Efficacy end points were analyzed with the full analysis set (ie, all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group regardless of whether they initiated treatment), and adverse event end points were analyzed with the safety analysis set (ie, all randomized participants exposed to at least 1 dose of randomized treatment).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Statistical Analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The superiority of subcutaneous semaglutide to placebo for the primary and secondary confirmatory end points was assessed in hierarchic order, with superiority at a significance level of 5% required before testing of subsequent end points in the hierarchy.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Statistical Analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, 567 participants (92.8%) completed the trial, and 505 (82.7%) completed the trial in the on-treatment period (Figure 1).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Study Participants
plainn = 567- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the semaglutide group, 12 were lost to follow-up by week 38, and in the placebo group, 5 were lost to follow-up by week 25.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Additional Contributions:
plainn = 12- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The study was conducted according to consensus ethical principles derived from guidelines, including the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice Guideline, and applicable local laws and regulations.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Study Design and Oversight
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Missing data were imputed with a multiple imputation approach, similar to that described by McEvoy.19 Missing body weight measurements were imputed by sampling from available measurements at week 68 from participants receiving randomized treatment in the relevant randomized treatment group.Missing values were multiply imputed (× 1000).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Statistical Analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] 19. McEvoy BW. Missing data in clinical trials for weight management. J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(1): 30-36. doi:10.1080/10543406.2015.1094814 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All participants provided written informed consent.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Study Design and Oversight
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Participants in STEP 1 lost 14.9% of baseline weight with semaglutide at 68 weeks, compared with 2.4% for placebo plus the same lifestyle intervention.31”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Adverse Events
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] 31. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al; the STEP 1 Study Group. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. Published February 10, 2021. doi:10.1056/ NEJMoa2032183
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The primary hierarchic statistical analyses were based on the treatment policy es-timand (similar to an intention-to-treat analysis), which quantified the average treatment effect among all randomized participants, regardless of adherence to treatment or initiation of rescue interventions (ie, antiobesity medications or bariatric surgery).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Statistical Analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, this was a relatively brief trial, which did not address whether semaglutide-treated participants would sustain their 16% weight reduction if they continued to receive the medication past 68 weeks.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Limitations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proportion of participants permanently discontinuing trial product was similar between treatment groups (semaglutide, 16.7%; placebo, 18.6%) (eFigure 2 in Supplement 1).”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Study Participants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, it could not identify the separate contributions to weight loss of intensive behavioral therapy and the initial low-calorie diet in the placebo group or, as previously indicated, determine the relative benefit of combining either of these enhanced interventions with semaglutide.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Limitations
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The protocol and amendments (available in Supplement 2) were approved by institutional review boards or independent ethics committees at each study site.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Study Design and Oversight
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 5.6% of participants were lost to follow-up.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Additional Contributions:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selected adverse events (eg, cardiovascular events, acute pancreatitis) and deaths were reviewed by an independent external event adjudication committee.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > End Points
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The authors state this as an assumption.
All randomized participants remained receiving randomized treatment for the duration of the trial and did not receive rescue intervention.
“The trial product estimand quantified the average treatment effect in all randomized participants, assuming they remained receiving randomized treatment for the duration of the trial (and without rescue intervention).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The STEP 1 and STEP 3 trial populations and lifestyle interventions are sufficiently comparable to allow an indirect comparison of weight loss outcomes.
“These findings suggest that the inclusion of intensive behavioral therapy plus an 8-week low-calorie diet ultimately may not contribute significant additional weight loss beyond that achieved by semaglutide and less-intensive lifestyle intervention.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“In 3 studies of 56-week duration involving persons with obesity and dyslipidemia or hypertension, weight loss ranged from 6.2% to 8.0% with 3 mg liraglutide vs 0.2% to 2.9% with placebo.754–756”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [754]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“In the SURMOUNT‐3 trial, individuals who received tirzepatide after a comprehensive 12‐week lifestyle intervention achieved a mean 25% weight reduction, compared to 4.8% in the placebo group [178]”
From Nutritional priorities to support GLP ‐1 therapy for obesity: A joint Advisory from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and The Obesity Society (2025) · cites this paper as [178]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“whereas in the SURMOUNT 3 trial, tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg/wk started after 12 weeks of intensive lifestyle intervention produced a 25% reduction from baseline (versus 4.8% with intensive lifestyle intervention alone) [178].”
From Nutritional priorities to support GLP-1 therapy for obesity: a joint Advisory from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and The Obesity Society (2025) · cites this paper as [178]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“whereas in the SURMOUNT 3 trial, tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg/week started after 12 weeks of intensive lifestyle intervention produced a 25% reduction from baseline (vs. 4.8% with intensive lifestyle intervention alone) [178].”
From Nutritional priorities to support GLP ‐1 therapy for obesity: A joint Advisory from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and The Obesity Society (2025) · cites this paper as [178]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In clinical trials of liraglutide 3 mg, the incidence of cholelithiasis was greater than placebo.741,754”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [754]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As the new obesity pharmacotherapies will lead up to 15–25% mean WL, intensive lifestyle interventions may provide small additional WL benefit to these treatments [11, 106].”
From What is the pipeline for future medications for obesity? (2025) · cites this paper as [106]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the first of the STEP trials (STEP 1–4), 68 weeks of once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment resulted in mean weight loss of 15%–17% in adults with overweight or obesity and 10% in those who also had type 2 diabetes.13, 14, 15, 16”
From Effects of once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg on C-reactive protein in adults with overweight or obesity (STEP 1, 2, and 3): exploratory analyses of three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The STEP 1, 2, 3, and 4 trials demonstrated that semaglutide 2.4 mg compared with placebo, as adjunct to lifestyle management or intensive behavioral therapy, led to mean weight losses of 6–15% in participants with and without type 2 diabetes (14,18–20).”
From Effects of semaglutide on albuminuria and kidney function in people with overweight or obesity with or without type 2 diabetes: exploratory analysis from the STEP 1, 2, and 3 trials (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Gallbladder-related disorders (primarily cholelithiasis) were reported in 2.6% vs 1.2% of participants on semaglutide vs placebo in STEP 1, 0.2% vs 0.7% of participants in STEP 2, and 4.9% vs 1.5% in STEP 3.”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This approval was based on the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP) clinical trial programme, which demonstrated significant weight reduction, improvement of cardiometabolic factors, and positive patient-reported outcomes. 16 -20”
From Efficacy and safety of semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight loss in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis including the 2‐year STEP 5 trial (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, four studies (n = 3087) 16,17,19,20 revealed that semaglutide led to a greater percentage of trial discontinuations due to GI AEs relative to placebo (RR 5.36, [95% CI 2.49, 11.55]; P < 0.0001 [Figure S16]).”
From Efficacy and safety of semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight loss in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis including the 2‐year STEP 5 trial (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The findings from three studies (n = 3375) 16 -18 showed that semaglutide induced a more significant enhancement in health-related quality of life compared to placebo. This improvement was evidenced by the higher SF-36 physical functioning score (MD:1.75 [95% CI 0.92, 2.58]; P < 0.0001 [Figure S11]).”
From Efficacy and safety of semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight loss in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis including the 2‐year STEP 5 trial (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Four studies (n = 3087) 16,17,19,20 reported a modification in levels of CRP, an indicator of inflammation. Evaluation of the combined analysis showed that semaglutide caused a significant reduction in CRP compared to placebo (MD: 38.92% [95% CI 43.69, 34.16]; P < 0.00001)”
From Efficacy and safety of semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight loss in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis including the 2‐year STEP 5 trial (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the semaglutide groups demonstrated a significant reduction in weight at the end of the treatment period for various steps, namely, 14.9% for STEP 1, 16% for STEP 3, 17.4% for STEP 4, 15.2% for STEP 5, and 15.8% for STEP 8.”
From Efficacy and safety of semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight loss in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis including the 2‐year STEP 5 trial (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Several RCTs have demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of gallbladder disorders among patients treated with GLP-1 RAs compared to placebo [29-32], as initially evidenced by the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) trial, which reported acute gallstone disease rates of 3.1% in the liraglutide group versus 1.9% in the placebo”
From Exploring the Side Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist: To Ensure Its Optimal Positioning (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The incidence of thyroid cancer in semaglutide-treated patients was less than 1%, suggesting no significant risk.”
From Assessment of Thyroid Carcinogenic Risk and Safety Profile of GLP1-RA Semaglutide (Ozempic) Therapy for Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Generally, approximately 15% weight loss was observed in overweight and obese, non-diabetic adults across various treatment periods, lasting up to 2 years (from STEP-1 to STEP-6, STEP-8) [72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].”
From New Developments in Pharmacological Treatment of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes—Beyond and within GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (2024) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In phase 3 trials, women aged ≥ 65 years achieved sustained weight loss of 10–20%, with consistent cardiometabolic improvements.”
From A Narrative Review on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Obesity in Older Women: Maximizing Weight Loss While Preserving Lean Mass (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Despite this attenuation, the improvements observed in metabolic parameters, such as HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin), blood pressure, and lipid profiles, were significant.”
From A Narrative Review on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Obesity in Older Women: Maximizing Weight Loss While Preserving Lean Mass (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“On average, weight loss in this age group ranged from 10–15%, with a slight attenuation of this effect in participants aged over 70 years.”
From A Narrative Review on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Obesity in Older Women: Maximizing Weight Loss While Preserving Lean Mass (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Two major trial programs, the STEP program for semaglutide [35,36,37,38,39] and the SURMOUNT trials [40,41,42,43] for tirzepatide, offer critical insights into the benefits of these therapies in older populations.”
From A Narrative Review on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Obesity in Older Women: Maximizing Weight Loss While Preserving Lean Mass (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“STEP 3 comprised a more intensive behavioral support program, with a hypoenergetic diet (1,200-1,800 kcal/day), increased physical activity, and 30 intensive behavioral therapy visits across the 68 week duration of the study, and achieved a somewhat greater weight loss of 16%.”
From The societal implications of using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As pharmacotherapy produces greater weight-loss maintenance than lifestyle alone (eg, STEP 3 Trial: difference, 10.3%; 95% CI, 8.6%-12.0%),12,99”
From Obesity Management in Adults: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [99]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Third, many RCTs included relatively few people from racial and ethnic minority groups and relatively small proportions of men.81,99”
From Obesity Management in Adults: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [99]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“noted superiority over other GLP-1RAs.”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of antipsychotic-associated weight gain in patients not responding to metformin – a case series (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Across all structured interventions [23, 26, 28, 29], the lack of diet‐only comparator arms and the inconsistent measurement of protein intake and micronutrient deficiency limited conclusions about the independent contribution of the nutritional component and its role in mitigating nutritional risks.”
From Nutrition Strategies for Next‐Generation Incretin Therapies: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Current Evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These constraints limit statistical power and preclude robust evaluation of long‐term outcomes, including sustained weight maintenance, micronutrient status, and preservation of lean tissue mass [5, 18, 28].”
From Nutrition Strategies for Next‐Generation Incretin Therapies: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Current Evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“as it is well-known that weight loss has an anti-inflammatory effect [30–32]”
From Impact of semaglutide on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: exploratory patient-level analyses of SUSTAIN and PIONEER randomized clinical trials (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the recently approved 2.4 mg dose of once-weekly GLP-1R agonist semaglutide (Wegovy) increases mean weight reduction in this population to 15–20% [[5], [6], [7], [8]]”
From Next generation GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triple agonists normalize body weight in obese mice (2022) · cites this paper as [6]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These reductions in HbA1c levels were accompanied by notable weight loss, with changes from −1.9 kg in the study by Ahrén et al. [23] with Sitagliptin as the comparison group, to an impressive −16.0% of body weight loss reported in Wadden et al. [30] with a 2.4 mg weekly dose of subcutaneous semaglutide”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the STEP 3 trial of semaglutide combined with intensive lifestyle intervention (30 counseling visits across 68 weeks, including nutrition, physical activity, and other behavioral strategies, plus 8 initial weeks of meal replacements with liquid shakes, meal bars, or portion‐controlled meals), individuals experienced a 16% reduction from baseline in body weight (vs. 5.7% with intensive lifestyle”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In these clinical trials, mean weight loss at 68 weeks was 14.9% (placebo, 2.4%; difference, 12.4%; 95% CI, 11.5%-13.4%) and 16.0% (placebo, 5.7%; difference, 10.3%; 95% CI, 8.6%-12.0%), respectively.81,99”
From Obesity Management in Adults: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [99]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Seven of the 10 RCTs were judged to have a low risk of bias based on the RoB 2 tool [5, 6, 13, 14, 26, 28, 29].”
From Nutrition Strategies for Next‐Generation Incretin Therapies: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Current Evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, no quantitative assessments of dietary intake or biochemical measures of nutrient adequacy were reported.”
From Nutrition Strategies for Next‐Generation Incretin Therapies: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Current Evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“weight loss was significantly greater with semaglutide compared with placebo (16.0% compared with 5.7%; p < 0.001)”
From Nutrition Strategies for Next‐Generation Incretin Therapies: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Current Evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“In STEP 1 and 3, participants were randomized 2:1 to escalating doses of semaglutide up to 2.4 mg/week or placebo for 68 weeks as an adjunct to either lifestyle intervention”
In the citing paper
“All three trials were conducted according to the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice Guideline and the Declaration of Helsinki; all participants provided written informed consent (14,18,19).”
In the citing paper
“Semaglutide has been shown to lower body weight by up to 16% when used in conjunction with lifestyle recommendations [10, 11, 12, 13].”
From Semaglutide for cardiovascular event reduction in people with overweight or obesity: SELECT study baseline characteristics (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“The study uses standard‐of‐care preventive measures along with semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneous once‐weekly treatment, which has been demonstrated to provide significant and sustained mean weight loss of up to 16% [10, 11, 12, 13, 24, 25], significant CV risk factor improvements, and proven CV benefit in patients with diabetes and prior CV events [16, 26].”
From Semaglutide for cardiovascular event reduction in people with overweight or obesity: SELECT study baseline characteristics (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“In the phase III Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with obesity (STEP) 1‐4 studies, weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg demonstrated substantial, clinically meaningful weight losses and improvements in cardiometabolic parameters and patient‐reported outcomes.”
In the citing paper
“In particular, at a dosage of 2.4 mg per week, it has been shown to induce an average weight loss between 9.6% and 17.4%, as well as a reduction in waist circumference and arterial hypertension and an improvement of lipid profile [34,35,36,37,39].”
From GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“The STEP trial programme assessed the effect of a high dose of the GLP-1RA semaglutide (2.4 mg once weekly by subcutaneous injection: Weygovy ) and typically noted about a 15% reduction in body weight during treatment periods up to 2 years in overweight and obese adults who did not have T2DM (STEP-1, 3, 4, 5, 8) [16-23].”
From Recent advances in peptide-based therapies for obesity and type 2 diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Semaglutide resulted in 10.3–17.4% difference in mean weight compared to placebo [15–17, 19].”
From Efficacy of GLP-1 RA Approved for Weight Management in Patients With or Without Diabetes: A Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“The proportion of subjects who lost ≥ 5% of baseline body weight was 86.4–88.7% [15–17, 19].”
From Efficacy of GLP-1 RA Approved for Weight Management in Patients With or Without Diabetes: A Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Both efficacy benchmark criteria for weight management products were met in STEP 1, 3, 4 and 8 trials [15–17, 19].”
From Efficacy of GLP-1 RA Approved for Weight Management in Patients With or Without Diabetes: A Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“While the STEP 2 trail included 51% female participants [22], the STEP 1, STEP 3 and STEP 4 trials included 73%, 81% and 79% female participants, respectively [15–17]. Thus, STEP 2 has a greater proportion of men (49.1%) than the other trials (19.0–25.9%).”
From Efficacy of GLP-1 RA Approved for Weight Management in Patients With or Without Diabetes: A Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“The percentage of Caucasian participants in each study was 76%, 62%, 76% and 84% for the STEP 1–4 trials, respectively [15–17, 22].”
From Efficacy of GLP-1 RA Approved for Weight Management in Patients With or Without Diabetes: A Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“the main trials for which data have been published (STEP 1 through STEP 5, STEP 8, and STEP TEENS) did not include participants who reported having symptoms of major depressive disorder within 2 years before screening, which limits their ability to assess psychiatric adverse events in people with a recent history of depression [3,4,93,94,95,96,97].”
From What Is Food Noise? A Conceptual Model of Food Cue Reactivity (2023) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“Orlistat three-times daily [56][57][58][59] was found in long-term trials to have potential benefits for both weight (mean total loss ≈7%) and cardiovascular risk factors, but placebo-subtracted weight losses are ≈3% and side-effects such oily stools limit its use.60”
From Approach to Obesity Treatment in Primary Care: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“The proportion of patients with premature discontinuation because of adverse events was 5.9–7.0% in the semaglutide groups and 2.9–3.5% in the placebo groups.”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Semaglutide-treated participants were more likely than placebo to lose ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20% of initial weight, with 35.7% and 3.7% of participants, respectively, meeting the last criterion (Figure 3).”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Most gastrointestinal events were mild-to-moderate in severity, transient, and occurred during the first 20 weeks of treatment during dose escalation.”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Participants in the semaglutide group, relative to placebo, had greater reductions in waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, c-reactive protein, hemoglobin A1c, and lipids (with the exception of HDL; Table 1).”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Participants who received semaglutide with intensive behavioral therapy lost 16.0% of initial weight at week 68, compared with 5.7% for placebo (estimated treatment difference = −10.3 percentage points; 95% CI=−12.0% to −8.6%, p<0.001; Figure 2).”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Groups did not differ significantly in physical function.”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“In STEP trials 1–3, the percent of participants in the semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo groups who experienced nausea was 33.7–58.2% versus 9.2–22.1%; diarrhea was 21.3–36.1% vs 11.9–22.1%; vomiting was 21.8–27.3% vs 2.7–10.8%; and constipation was 17.4–36.9% vs 5.5–24.5%.”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“As with other GLP-1 receptor agonists, semaglutide is associated with increases in heart rate of 1 to 4 beats per minute.(34–36, 38)”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“However, this combined intervention produced a 16% loss at week 68, only 1 percentage point greater than that observed in STEP 1.”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“In STEP 1 and STEP 3, patients on semaglutide lost 14.8–16.0% BW compared to 2.4–5.7% in the placebo group at 68 weeks26,27.”
From Incretin-based therapies for the treatment of obesity-related diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Across the phase 3 STEP program for semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c.weekly plus lifestyle modification in individuals living with obesity without T2D, the body weight reduction from baseline ranged from 12.1% to 18.2%.107-113”
From Management of type 2 diabetes, obesity, or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with high‐dose GLP‐1 receptor agonists and GLP‐1 receptor‐based co‐agonists (2024) · cites this paper as [111]
In the citing paper
“In the SURMOUNT-3 trial, individuals who received tirzepatide after a comprehensive 12-week lifestyle intervention achieved a mean 25% weight reduction, compared to 4.8% in the placebo group [178]”
In the citing paper
“Compared to the STEP 1 trial, individuals in the STEP 3 placebo group lost more weight with the addition of IBT; however, mean weight reduction in the semaglutide group was only 1% greater than that observed in STEP 1.”
From New Frontiers in Obesity Treatment: GLP-1 and Nascent Nutrient-Stimulated Hormone-Based Therapeutics (2023) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Estimated mean weight change from baseline was 16% with semaglutide versus 5.7% with placebo (mean difference of 10.3%) (35).”
From New Frontiers in Obesity Treatment: GLP-1 and Nascent Nutrient-Stimulated Hormone-Based Therapeutics (2023) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“In the STEP 1-4 trials (semaglutide), the proportion of participants experiencing nausea increased from 0 to ~20% from Week 0 to Week 20 (dose escalation or run-in period), then decreased to ~4% by Week 68 (maintenance phase) [13,65,84,93,98].”
From Symptomatic Adverse Events and Quality of Life Related to Incretin-Based Medicines for Obesity: A Systematic Review Involving >400,000 Subjects (2025) · cites this paper as [93]
In the citing paper
“the FDA approved semaglutide in June 2021 for long-term weight management in overweight or people with obesity (31–33).”
From Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with semaglutide: A pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“Looking beyond headline weight loss results, substantial response variability exists within patient populations, with the STEP and SURMOUNT trials reporting that 10% to 15% of individuals lose <5% on semaglutide or tirzepatide, respectively, and are thus classed as “nonresponders” (77, 79, 80, 94, 100).”
From GLP-1 and the Neurobiology of Eating Control: Recent Advances (2025) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“However, the STEP3 trial did include an 8-week low-calorie diet prior to semaglutide initiation (94), which did not result in notably greater weight loss than the STEP1 trial which did not include such a lead-in (79)”
From GLP-1 and the Neurobiology of Eating Control: Recent Advances (2025) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“The most successful obesity therapeutics – glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1R) agonists – cause aversive responses such as nausea and vomiting1,2, effects which may contribute to their efficacy.”
From Dissociable hindbrain GLP1R circuits for satiety and aversion (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Additional Contributions:
“A total of 5.6% of participants were lost to follow-up.”
§ Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial > Co-Primary End Points
“18 Lost to follow-up c 4 Withdrew consent 4 Other 2 Adverse event 3 Withdrew from trial 12 Discontinued treatment prematurely b (and withdrew from trial) 7 Lost to follow-up c”
Citations
Cites
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity
Wilding, J. P. H., Batterham, R. L., Calanna, S., Davies, M., Van Gaal, L. F., Lingvay, I., McGowan, B. M., Rosenstock, J., Tran, M. T. D., Wadden, T. A., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2032183 · Cited by 5,205
Self-citation2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults
Jensen, M. D., Ryan, D. H., Apovian, C. M., Ard, J. D., Comuzzie, A. G., Donato, K. A., Hu, F. B., Hubbard, V. S., Jakicic, J. M., Kushner, R. F., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004 · Cited by 4,058
Self-citationJensen, M. D., Ryan, D. H., Apovian, C. M., Ard, J. D., Comuzzie, A. G., Donato, K. A., Hu, F. B., Hubbard, V. S., Jakicic, J. M., Kushner, R. F., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee · Cited by 2,735
Self-citationFuller, N. R., Colagiuri, S., SCHOFIELD, D. J., Olson, A. D., Shrestha, R. N., Holzapfel, C., Wolfenstetter, S. B., Holle, R., Ahern, A. L., Hauner, H., et al. (2012) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2012.139 · Cited by 2,127
Garvey, W. T., Mechanick, J. I., Brett, E. M., Garber, A. J., Hurley, D. L., Jastreboff, A. M., Nadolsky, K., Pessah-Pollack, R., & Plodkowski, R. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161365.gl · Cited by 1,914
Self-citationWing, R. R., Lang, W., Wadden, T. A., Safford, M., Knowler, W. C., Bertoni, A. G., Hill, J. O., Brancati, F. L., Peters, A., Wagenknecht, L., et al. (2011) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-2415 · Cited by 1,828
Self-citationLong-term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss
Sumithran, P., Prendergast, L. A., Delbridge, E., Purcell, K., Shulkes, A., Kriketos, A., & Proietto, J. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1105816 · Cited by 1,449
Maintenance of Lost Weight and Long-Term Management of Obesity
Hall, K. D., & Kahan, S. (2018) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2017.08.012 · Cited by 876
Weight Loss and Improvement in Comorbidity: Differences at 5%, 10%, 15%, and Over
Ryan, D. H., & Yockey, S. R. (2017) · Current Obesity Reports · doi:10.1007/s13679-017-0262-y · Cited by 831
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,099
Rubino, D., Angelene, H., Fabricatore, A. N., & Ard, J. D. (2024) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.24042 · Cited by 23
“Information on subject disposition was previously detailed [18 – 21].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationEvolving Approaches for Pharmacological Therapy of Obesity
Chao, A. M., Taylor, S. I., Moore, M., Amaro, A., & Wadden, T. A. (2024) · The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-031124-101146 · Cited by 29
Self-citationEffects of semaglutide on metabolism and gut microbiota in high-fat diet-induced obese mice
Sun, L., Shang, B., Lv, S., Liu, G., Wu, Q., & Geng, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1562896 · Cited by 28
Singh, V., Sun, J. M., Cheng, S. C., Kwan, A. C., & Velazquez, A. (2025) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-025-03352-y · Cited by 31
Structured lifestyle modification as an adjunct to obesity pharmacotherapy: there is much to learn
Murphy, E. E., & Finucane, F. M. (2024) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/s41366-024-01499-2 · Cited by 22
Incretin hormone agonists: Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for obesity management
Alhomoud, I. S., Talasaz, A. H., Chandrasekaran, P., Brown, R., Mehta, A., & Dixon, D. L. (2024) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.4607 · Cited by 25
Liu, Y., He, L., Han, S., Ping, F., Li, W., Xu, L., Zhang, H., & Li, Y. (2025) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.124.039446 · Cited by 25
Mozaffarian, D., Agarwal, M., Aggarwal, M., Alexander, L., Apovian, C. M., Bindlish, S., Bonnet, J. P., Butsch, W. S., Christensen, S. M., Gianos, E., et al. (2025) · Obesity Pillars · doi:10.1016/j.obpill.2026.100269 · Cited by 30
Targeting skeletal muscle mitochondrial health in obesity
Pileggi, C. A., Hooks, B. G., McPherson, R., Dent, R. R. M., & Harper, M.-E. (2022) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20210506 · Cited by 21
Smith, I., Hardy, E., Mitchell, S., & Batson, S. (2022) · Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity · doi:10.2147/dmso.s392952 · Cited by 26
How can physical activity facilitate a sustainable future? Reducing obesity and chronic disease
Stensel, D. J. (2023) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665123002203 · Cited by 23
Semaglutide-eye-catching results
Berković, M. C., & Strollo, F. (2023) · World Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.4239/wjd.v14.i4.424 · Cited by 21
Oertel, M., Ziegler, C. G., Kohlhaas, M., Nickel, A. G., Kloock, S., Maack, C., Sequeira, V., Faßnacht, M., & Dischinger, U. (2024) · Endocrine Connections · doi:10.1530/ec-23-0398 · Cited by 21
“In adults with overweight or obesity and without diabetes mellitus, semaglutide leads to a mean weight loss of about 10% compared to placebo (21).”
BackgroundChetty, A. K., Rafi, E., Bellini, N. J., Buchholz, N., & Isaacs, D. M. (2023) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2023.12.010 · Cited by 20
Patients’ experiences with GLP1-RAs – a systematic review
Ibsen, C. K., Kousgaard, M. B., Olsen, S., Christiansen, A.-K. L., Sandholdt, C., Rørth, R., & Overbeck, G. (2025) · Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.1080/02813432.2025.2477141 · Cited by 19
Kaplan, L. M., Gudzune, K. A., Ard, J. D., Kumar, R. B., Ahmad, N. N., Kan, H. J., Sims, T. J., Poon, J. L., King-Concialdi, K., Beusterien, K. M., et al. (2025) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.24290 · Cited by 23
Muzurović, E. M., Katsiki, N., Volčanšek, Š., Plescia, F., Rizzo, M., & Mantzoros, C. S. (2026) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2026.156494 · Cited by 24
Alexander, G. C., Xiao, X., Dilek, S., Lewis, S. V., Deng, Q., Kim, M., Bolanle, D., Saldanha, I. J., & Mehta, H. B. (2026) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.8222 · Cited by 27
COVID-19 Vaccines: Special Considerations for the Obese Population
Kipshidze, N. N., Kipshidze, N., & Fried, M. (2021) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-021-05404-y · Cited by 20
“, semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutidue, lorcaeserin, orilistate, and others) could be utilized [14].”
Managing weight and glycaemic targets in people with type 2 diabetes—How far have we come?
Blüher, M., Ceriello, A., Davies, M. J., Rodbard, H. W., Sattar, N. A., Schnell, O., Tonchevska, E., & Giorgino, F. (2022) · Endocrinology Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1002/edm2.330 · Cited by 19
“95,96,127,128 Both GLP-1 RAs with good efficacy for weight loss and SGLT2i are recommended as a second-line monotherapy when there is a compelling need to minimize weight gain, or to promote weight loss.”
Self-citationPharmacological profile of once-weekly injectable semaglutide for chronic weight management
Lau, D. C. W., Batterham, R. L., & le Roux, C. W. (2022) · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1080/17512433.2022.2070473 · Cited by 24
“7% with placebo, both combined with IBT and meal replacements [43].”
BackgroundInfluentialOlszanecka‐Glinianowicz, M., Mazur, A., Chudek, J. T., Kos‐Kudła, B., Markuszewski, L., Dudek, D., Major, P., Małczak, P., Tarnowski, W., Jaworski, P., et al. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15071641 · Cited by 22
Semaglutide: a new drug for the treatment of obesity
Lexchin, J., & Mintzes, B. J. (2023) · Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin · doi:10.1136/dtb.2023.000007 · Cited by 20
Transforming steatotic liver disease management: The emerging role of GLP-1 receptor agonists
Jensen, E., Israelsen, M. E., & Krag, A. A. (2024) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000561 · Cited by 24
Bain, E., & Bain, S. C. (2021) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.14487 · Cited by 21
“4 mg QW with placebo for weight management in adults with overweight or obesity, as an adjunct to a low-calorie diet for 8 weeks and intensive behavioural therapy (made up of 30 counselling visits).(27) A total of 611 par-”
MethodCengiz, A., Wu, C. C., & Lawley, S. D. (2025) · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16229 · Cited by 20
Medical Nutrition Therapy: Still Relevant in the Era of Pharmacotherapy for Obesity Care
Miller, C. K. (2025) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2024.06.222 · Cited by 19
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Agonists
Chan, P. Y. W., Mika, A. P., Martin, J. R., & Wilson, J. M. (2024) · JBJS Reviews · doi:10.2106/jbjs.rvw.23.00167 · Cited by 20
Butucă, A., Dobrea, C. M., Arseniu, A. M., Frum, A., Chiş, A. A., Rus, L. L., Ghibu, S., Juncan, A. M., Muntean, A. C., Lazăr, A. E., et al. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12051124 · Cited by 24
“Thus, LIR could reduce body weight by up to 9.2% (56 weeks) [37,38], SEM up to 17.4% (68 weeks) [39,40], and TIR up to 20.9% (72 weeks) [39].”
BackgroundInfluentialThe role of incretin receptor agonists in the treatment of obesity
Forst, T. M., Block, C. E. M. D., Prato, S. D., Armani, S., Frías, J. P., Lautenbach, A., Ludvik, B. H., Marinez, M., Mathieu, C., Müller, T. D., et al. (2024) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.15796 · Cited by 20
“59,60 In STEP 8, subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4-mg treatment was associated with significantly greater weight loss than liraglutide over 68 weeks (Table 3), and significantly greater odds of achieving 10% or higher, 15% or higher, or 20% or higher weight loss.”
InfluentialSelf-citationCVOT summit report 2024: new cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic outcomes
Schnell, O., Almandoz, J. P., Anderson, L., Barnard-Kelly, K. D., Battelino, T., Blüher, M., Busetto, L., Catrinou, D., Ceriello, A., Cos, X., et al. (2025) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-025-02700-0 · Cited by 21
Semaglutide: a key medication for managing cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome
MacIsaac, R. J. (2025) · Future Cardiology · doi:10.1080/14796678.2025.2511412 · Cited by 28
“Created using data from [30–32]. from baseline to week 68 [8,58–60].”
Sinha, B., & Ghosal, S. (2025) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.24360 · Cited by 27
Lim, S. K., Buranapin, S., Bao, X., Quiroga, M., Park, K. H., Kang, J., Rinnov, A. R., & Suwanagool, A. (2025) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(25)00164-0 · Cited by 22
Sabatella, L., Ortega, P., Valentí, V., Rotellar, F., Pagola, A. U., Ahmed, A. R., Purkayastha, S., Tuero, C., Blanco, N., & Landecho, M. F. (2025) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.70100 · Cited by 29
Bariatric surgery and weight loss in the short‐ and long‐term: Evidence from NHANES 2015–2018
Xie, W., Johnston, S. S., Waggoner, J. R., Doshi, I., & Stokes, A. C. (2022) · Clinical Obesity · doi:10.1111/cob.12563 · Cited by 17
Game changers: do new medications make lifestyle‐based treatment of obesity obsolete?
Lewis, K. H., Moore, J. B., & Ard, J. D. (2023) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.23962 · Cited by 20
“When intensive lifestyle intervention was combined with semaglutide 2.4 mg in the STEP 3 trial [9], it did not produce a greater magnitude of weight loss than what was observed in the STEP 1 trial, at least in the short term.”
MethodInfluentialSemaglutide and Other GLP-1 Agonists: A Boon for the Arthroplasty Industry?
Magruder, M. L., Jacofsky, D., Springer, B. D., Scuderi, G. R., Hameed, D., & Mont, M. A. (2024) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.12.014 · Cited by 19
Exploring the wider benefits of semaglutide treatment in obesity: insight from the STEP program.
O’Neil, P. M., & Rubino, D. M. (2022) · Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.1080/00325481.2022.2150006 · Cited by 19
Self-citationSørensen, M. S., Pottegård, A., Andersen, N. E., Thomsen, R. W., & Lundby, C. (2025) · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16222 · Cited by 18
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists
Stanton, E. W., Manasyan, A., Banerjee, R., Hong, K. M., Koesters, E. C., & Daar, D. A. (2024) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000004089 · Cited by 21
Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on weight and cardiovascular outcomes: A review
Raza, F. A., Altaf, R., Bashir, T., Asghar, F., Altaf, R., Tousif, S., Goyal, A., Mohammed, A., Mohammad, M. F., Anan, M., et al. (2024) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000040364 · Cited by 27
Neural pathways of nausea and roles in energy balance
Zhang, C. (2025) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2024.102963 · Cited by 19
“By far, the most common adverse side effects of GLP1R agonists are nausea and vomiting, with up to 60 % of patients reporting these effects, limiting adherence and efficacy [11,12].”
Weight Management Strategies to Reduce Metabolic Morbidity in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Diakosavvas, M., Oyebode, O. O., & Bhide, P. (2025) · Current Obesity Reports · doi:10.1007/s13679-025-00614-2 · Cited by 19
“STEP 3 underscored the value of intensive behavioral therapy, with a 16.0% weight reduction at 68 weeks significantly outpacing the 5.7% seen with placebo [34].”
InfluentialSafwan, M., Bourgleh, M. S., Alotaibi, S. A., Alotaibi, E. A., Al-Ruqi, A., & Raeya, F. E. (2025) · Annals of Saudi Medicine · doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2025.129 · Cited by 30
Moiz, A., Zolotarova, T., Filion, K. B., & Eisenberg, M. J. (2026) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1093/ajh/hpaf205 · Cited by 26
Outcomes measures in idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Mollan, S. P., & Sinclair, A. J. (2021) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/14737175.2021.1931127 · Cited by 24
Obesity-Related Glomerulopathy: Clinical Management
Herman‐Edelstein, M., Weinstein, T., & Chagnac, A. (2021) · Seminars in Nephrology · doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.06.007 · Cited by 19
Ebadinejad, A., Barzin, M., Abiri, B., Mahdavi, M., Khalaj, A., Ebrahimi, D., Hosseinpanah, F., & Valizadeh, M. (2022) · BMC Surgery · doi:10.1186/s12893-022-01740-7 · Cited by 18
“It should be noted that recent studies have revealed that some pharmacological treatments, in addition to having a significant influence on weight loss, also have a positive effect on improving glycemic status [33, 34].”
BackgroundNovel Treatments for Obesity: Implications for Cancer Prevention and Treatment
Cuttica, C. M., Briata, I. M., & DeCensi, A. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15173737 · Cited by 18
“4% (1/268; metastatic lung cancer) in the control group, respectively [77,78].”
Acute pancreatitis due to different semaglutide regimens: An updated meta-analysis
Masson, W., Lobo, M., Barbagelata, L., Lavalle-Cobo, A., & Nogueira, J. P. (2024) · Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición (English ed.) · doi:10.1016/j.endien.2024.03.012 · Cited by 22
Pharmacotherapy as an Augmentation to Bariatric Surgery for Obesity
Horváth, L., Mráz, M., Jude, E. B., & Haluzı́k, M. (2024) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-024-02029-0 · Cited by 19
“STEP 2 and STEP 3 trials have also confirmed a significant weight loss effect [121, 122].”
BackgroundDespain, D., & Hoffman, B. L. (2024) · Obesity Pillars · doi:10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100143 · Cited by 27
“Moreover, the discussion highlights the need for ongoing adjustments to medication dosages and dietary recommendations to improve patient comfort and compliance, as has been used in studies previously [14 – 16].”
Understanding the pathophysiologic pathways that underlie obesity and options for treatment
Kumar, R. B., Srivastava, G., Reid, T. J., & Aronne, L. J. (2021) · Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1080/17446651.2021.1991310 · Cited by 20
Weight Loss Outcomes With Telemedicine During COVID-19
Tchang, B. G., Morrison, C., Kim, J. T., Ahmed, F., Chan, K. M., Alonso, L. C., Aronne, L. J., & Shukla, A. P. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.793290 · Cited by 18
Recent progress in the pharmacotherapy for obesity
Lu, J., Liu, P., Cai, M., Lv, T., Zhang, M., Yin, K., Cheng, J., & Zhang, G. (2025) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177850 · Cited by 17
Edwards‐Hampton, S. A., & Ard, J. (2024) · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.15819 · Cited by 17
Cardiometabolic risk factors efficacy of semaglutide in the STEP program
Amaro, A., SKOLNIK, N., & Sugimoto, D. H. (2022) · Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.1080/00325481.2022.2147325 · Cited by 17
Larsen, A. T., Melander, S. A., Sonne, N., BREDTOFT, E.-M., Al-Rubai, M., Karsdal, M. A., & Henriksen, K. (2023) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114969 · Cited by 16
Vilarrasa, E., Nicolau, J., de la Cueva, P., Goday, A., Gallardo, F., Martorell, A., & Carrascosa, J. M. (2023) · Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas · doi:10.1016/j.ad.2023.06.017 · Cited by 21
Kushner, R. F., Fink‐Jensen, A., Frenkel, O., McGowan, B. M., Goldman, B., Overvad, M., & Wadden, T. A. (2023) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.23946 · Cited by 17
“The trial designs of STEP 1 – 3 and 5 have been fully reported previously [16, 18 – 20].”
MethodSelf-citationApproved and Emerging Hormone-Based Anti-Obesity Medications: A Review Article
Sidrak, W. R., Kalra, S., & Kalhan, A. (2024) · Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.4103/ijem.ijem_442_23 · Cited by 21
“STEP 2 (in individuals with T2DM) [19] and STEP 3 (IBT) [20] trials also showed weight loss benefits, with a placebo‑subtracted weight loss of 6.2% and 10.3%, respectively.”
InfluentialRecent achievements and future directions of anti-obesity medications
Grandl, G., Novikoff, A., Liu, X., & Müller, T. D. (2024) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101100 · Cited by 23
Alabduljabbar, K., Alsaqaaby, M., Neff, K. J., Crotty, M., & le Roux, C. W. (2023) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-023-03534-0 · Cited by 16
High-Dose Once-Weekly Semaglutide: A New Option for Obesity Management
Bradley, C. L., McMillin, S. M., Hwang, A. Y., & Sherrill, C. H. (2022) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1177/10600280211053867 · Cited by 16
Patient initiation and maintenance of GLP-1 RAs for treatment of obesity
Patel, D., & Smith, A. (2021) · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1080/17512433.2021.1947796 · Cited by 16
McGowan, B. M., Houshmand‐Oeregaard, A. S., Laursen, P. N., Zeuthen, N., & Baker‐Knight, J. (2023) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.23732 · Cited by 16
Jeyakumar, Y., Richardson, L., Sarma, S., Retnakaran, R. R., & Kramer, C. K. (2024) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017177 · Cited by 18
Eisa, N., & Barood, O. (2026) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.70666 · Cited by 36
Moore, S. G., & Butler, T. (2022) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.23524 · Cited by 16
“The efficacy of pharmacological interventions to overcome some of the biological factors that underlie obesity, including appetite [8], highlights this and also emphasizes that supporting clinically significant weight loss requires additional behavioral modifications and psychological support [9].”
BackgroundLarsen, A. T., Karsdal, M. A., & Henriksen, K. (2023) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175837 · Cited by 16
Kurtzhals, P., Kreiner, F. F., & Bindra, R. S. (2023) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110881 · Cited by 20
The Benefit of Healthy Lifestyle in the Era of New Medications to Treat Obesity
Grave, R. D. (2024) · Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity · doi:10.2147/dmso.s447582 · Cited by 17
What is the evidence regarding the safety of new obesity pharmacotherapies
Vidal, J., Flores, L., Jiménez, A., Pané, A., & de Hollanda, A. (2025) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/s41366-024-01488-5 · Cited by 15
Regulation of energy metabolism through central GIPR signaling
Liśkiewicz, A., & Müller, T. D. (2024) · Peptides · doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171198 · Cited by 18
A Real-World Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Semaglutide for Weight Loss
Tzoulis, P., Batavanis, M., & Baldeweg, S. E. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.59558 · Cited by 18
“This real-world study showed an early improvement in glycemic markers, confirming the glucose-lowering effect reported in STEP studies [7-9].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKhan, T. T. S., Sheikh, Z., Maleknia, S. D., Oveissi, F., Fathi, A., Abrams, T., Ong, H. X., & Traini, D. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2024.2387110 · Cited by 18
Spreckley, M., Ruggiero, C. F., & Brown, A. (2026) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.70079 · Cited by 16
Scragg, J., Koutoukidis, D. A., Dirksen, C., Heitmann, B. L., & Jebb, S. A. (2025) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2025.100805 · Cited by 16
Xu, Y., Echouffo Tcheugui, J. B., Coresh, J., Grams, M. E., Selvin, E., Fang, M., & Shin, J. (2025) · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16300 · Cited by 15
“40 GLP-1RAs may enhance dietary quality and physical function, while structured lifestyle programmes support long-term behavioural changes.”
Khalid, S. I., Massaad, E., Thomson, K. B., & Shin, J. H. (2024) · Journal of Neurosurgery Spine · doi:10.3171/2024.6.spine24141 · Cited by 17
Seddio, A. E., Wilhelm, C. V., Gouzoulis, M. J., Islam, W., Vasudevan, R. S., Halperin, S. J., Rubin, L. E., Medvecky, M. J., Donohue, K. W., & Grauer, J. N. (2024) · JSES International · doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.10.006 · Cited by 17
“9,19,40,44 As such, semaglutide has become a fi rst-line medication recommendation by the American Diabetes Association for the management of T2DM.”
Liu, L., Cui, J., Neidecker, M. V., & Nahata, M. C. (2025) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.5.441 · Cited by 20
Samson, S. L., Vellanki, P., Blonde, L., Hirsch, I. B., Hoang, T. D., Isaacs, S. D., Izuora, K. E., Wang, C. C. L., Ooi, C. P., Padilla, B. I., et al. (2026) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2026.01.006 · Cited by 29
Pharmacologic Weight Management in the Era of Adolescent Obesity
Raman, V. S., Gupta, A., Ashraf, A. P., Breidbart, E., Gourgari, E., Kamboj, M. K., Kohn, B., Krishnan, S., Lahoti, A., Matlock, K. A., et al. (2022) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac418 · Cited by 15
Sarzani, R., Landolfo, M., Pentima, C. D., Ortensi, B., Falcioni, P., Sabbatini, L., Massacesi, A., Rampino, I., Spannella, F., & Giulietti, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1365183 · Cited by 18
Sex Differences in Obesity and Its Treatment
Ghanta, A., Wilson, E., & Chao, A. M. (2025) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-025-01601-z · Cited by 16
Mutwalli, H., Keeler, J. L., Bektas, S., Dhopatkar, N., Treasure, J. L., & Himmerich, H. (2023) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.02.006 · Cited by 16
“The latter is believed to be a practice-changing invention for weight control due to its low risk-benefit ratio seen in recent clinical trials (Wilding et al., 2021; Rubino et al., 2021; Davies et al., 2021; Wadden et al., 2021).”
BackgroundCraig, H. C., Alsaeed, D., Heneghan, H., Al-Najim, W., Al Ozairi, E., & le Roux, C. W. (2025) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/s41366-024-01524-4 · Cited by 15
Titration and discontinuation of semaglutide for weight management in commercially insured US adults
Xu, Y., Carrero, J. J., Chang, A. R., Inker, L. A., Zhang, D., Mukhopadhyay, A., Blecker, S. B., Horwitz, L. I., Grams, M. E., & Shin, J. (2025) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.24315 · Cited by 16
Forst, T. M., Block, C. E. M. D., Prato, S. D., Frías, J. P., Lautenbach, A., Ludvik, B. H., Marinez, M., Mathieu, C., Müller, T. D., & Schnell, O. (2025) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16247 · Cited by 15
Self-citationCatalfamo, L. M., Ponte, F. S. D., & Rinaldis, D. D. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14155269 · Cited by 20
“Studies such as STEP-1 [23], STEP-2 [24], STEP-3 [25], and SURMOUNT-1 [26] have demonstrated weight reductions ranging from 10% to 20%, with a substantial proportion— up to 75–85%—of this loss attributable to reductions in fat mass. Concurrently, an average reduction of approximately 20% in lean…”
Velji-Ibrahim, J., Radadiya, D. K., Devani, K., Patel, H. K., Nathani, P., Hassan, C., Pugliese, N., Thompson, C., & Sharma, P. (2025) · Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1155/jobe/3897161 · Cited by 17
Achieving Health Equity Through Digestive Diseases Research and Scientific Workforce Diversity
Singh, M. E., James, S. P., Germino, G. G., et al. (2022) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.01.005 · Cited by 14
Kumar, N., & D’Alessio, D. A. (2022) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac276 · Cited by 14
Liu, M., Huang, R., Xu, L., Zhang, S., Zhong, X., Chen, X., Lin, Y., Xiong, Z., Wang, L., Liao, X., et al. (2022) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101451 · Cited by 16
Kolotkin, R. L., Jeppesen, O. K., Baker‐Knight, J., Lee, S. Y., Tokita, A., & Kadowaki, T. (2023) · Clinical Obesity · doi:10.1111/cob.12589 · Cited by 17
Semaglutide for Weight Loss: Was It Worth the Weight?
Novograd, J., Mullally, J., & Frishman, W. H. (2022) · Cardiology in Review · doi:10.1097/crd.0000000000000430 · Cited by 15
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Analogues for the Treatment of Obesity
Williams, D. M., Staff, M., Bain, S. C., & Min, T. (2022) · touchREVIEWS in Endocrinology · doi:10.17925/ee.2022.18.1.43 · Cited by 15
Zhang, B., Xu, W., Yin, C., & Tang, Y. (2022) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2022.115164 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Wadden, T. A., Bailey, T. S., Billings, L. K., Davies, M., Frias, J. P., Koroleva, A., Lingvay, I., O’Neil, P. M., Rubino, D. M., Skovgaard, D., Wallenstein, S. O. R., Garvey, W. T., & STEP 3 Investigators
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- AMCR Institute (US)
- Endeavor Health (US)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- National Research Institute, Los Angeles, California
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Weight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
- Washington Center for Weight Management and Research (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wadden, Thomas A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2021-04-13
- Volume
- 325
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1403
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- PMC
- PMC7905697
- OpenAlex
- W3129305070
- Cited by
- 1,114
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 237 · 2025: 287 · 2024: 222 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 85
- FWCI
- 85.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK079626)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Keywords
- semaglutide, obesity, overweight, weight loss, hypocaloric diet, GLP-1 receptor agonists, pharmacotherapy, adjunctive therapy, comorbid obesity, cardiometabolic risk factors, weight regain after weight loss
- MeSH terms
- Semaglutide, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Diet, Reducing, Double-Blind Method, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Humans, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Weight Loss, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Anti-Obesity Agents, Overweight, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
