Assessment of a Plasma Amyloid Probability Score to Estimate Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Findings Among Adults With Cognitive Impairment
Open accessAbstract
Importance: The diagnostic evaluation for Alzheimer disease may be improved by a blood-based diagnostic test identifying presence of brain amyloid plaque pathology. Objective: To determine the clinical performance associated with a diagnostic algorithm incorporating plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) 42:40 ratio, patient age, and apoE proteotype to identify brain amyloid status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study includes analysis from 2 independent cross-sectional cohort studies: the discovery cohort of the Plasma Test for Amyloidosis Risk Screening (PARIS) study, a prospective add-on to the Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning study, including 249 patients from 2018 to 2019, and MissionAD, a dataset of 437 biobanked patient samples obtained at screenings during 2016 to 2019. Data were analyzed from May to November 2020. Exposures: Amyloid detected in blood and by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the diagnostic performance of plasma Aβ42:40 ratio, together with apoE proteotype and age, for identifying amyloid PET status, assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: All 686 participants (mean [SD] age 73.2 [6.3] years; 368 [53.6%] men; 378 participants [55.1%] with amyloid PET findings) had symptoms of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. The AUC of plasma Aβ42:40 ratio for PARIS was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.85) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89) for MissionAD. Ratio cutoffs for Aβ42:40 based on the Youden index were similar between cohorts (PARIS: 0.089; MissionAD: 0.092). A logistic regression model (LRM) incorporating Aβ42:40 ratio, apoE proteotype, and age improved diagnostic performance within each cohort (PARIS: AUC, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81-0.91]; MissionAD: AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.92]), and overall accuracy was 78% (95% CI, 72%-83%) for PARIS and 83% (95% CI, 79%-86%) for MissionAD. The model developed on the prospectively collected samples from PARIS performed well on the MissionAD samples (AUC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.91]; accuracy, 78% [95% CI, 74%-82%]). Training the LRM on combined cohorts yielded an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) and accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 78%-84%). The output of this LRM is the Amyloid Probability Score (APS). For clinical use, 2 APS cutoff values were established yielding 3 categories, with low, intermediate, and high likelihood of brain amyloid plaque pathology. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that this blood biomarker test could allow for distinguishing individuals with brain amyloid-positive PET findings from individuals with amyloid-negative PET findings and serve as an aid for Alzheimer disease diagnosis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BBMs have not been recommended as standalone diagnostic tests due to a lack of studies demonstrating their equivalence to clinically used CSF and PET methods.
“Despite BBMs being used in clinical practice in some countries, including the United States, they have not been recommended as standalone diagnostic tests due to a lack of studies demonstrating their equivalence to clinically used CSF and PET methods16,35–37.”
From Highly accurate blood test for Alzheimer's disease is similar or superior to clinical cerebrospinal fluid tests (2024) · cites this paper as [36]
The Discussion uses amyloid PET as the study’s reference standard, and the Conclusions say the blood test could aid physicians evaluating patients. Neither section addresses recommendations against standalone blood-biomarker diagnosis or attributes such recommendations to a lack of studies showing equivalence to CSF and PET methods. Searches for standalone use, recommendations, and equivalence found no passage making that point. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 120
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- [1]2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 16(3): 391- 460. doi: 10.1002/alz.12068 32157811 · DOI · Paper page
- [2]Rajan KB, Weuve J, Barnes LL, McAninch EA, Wilson RS, Evans DA. Population estimate of people with clinical Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment in the United States (2020-2060). Alzheimers Dement. 2021; 17(12): 1966- 1975. doi: 10.1002/alz.12362 34043283 PMC9013315 · DOI · Paper page
- [3]Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002; 298(5594): 789- 791. doi: 10.1126/science.1074069 12399581 · DOI · Paper page
- [4]Morris JC. Clinical assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1997; 49(3)(suppl 3): S7- S10. doi: 10.1212/WNL.49.3_Suppl_3.S7 9310506 · DOI
- [5]Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002; 297(5580): 353- 356. doi: 10.1126/science.1072994 12130773 · DOI · Paper page
- [8]Golde TE, Dickson D, Hutton M. Filling the gaps in the Aβ cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2006; 3(5): 421- 430. doi: 10.2174/156720506779025189 17168641 · DOI
- [9]Tanzi RE, Bertram L. Twenty years of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid hypothesis: a genetic perspective. Cell. 2005; 120(4): 545- 555. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.008 15734686 · DOI · Paper page
- [10]Musiek ES, Holtzman DM. Three dimensions of the amyloid hypothesis: time, space and ‘wingmen’. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(6): 800- 806. doi: 10.1038/nn.4018 26007213 PMC4445458 · DOI
- [12]Khoury R, Ghossoub E. Diagnostic biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: a state-of-the-art review. Biomarkers Neuropsychiatry. 2019; 1: 100005. doi: 10.1016/j.bionps.2019.100005 · DOI
- [13]Rabinovici GD, Gatsonis C, Apgar C,. Association of amyloid positron emission tomography with subsequent change in clinical management among Medicare beneficiaries with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. JAMA. 2019; 321(13): 1286- 1294. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2000 30938796 PMC6450276 · DOI · Paper page
- [14]Schindler SE, Bollinger JG, Ovod V,. High-precision plasma β-amyloid 42/40 predicts current and future brain amyloidosis. Neurology. 2019; 93(17): e1647- e1659. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008081 31371569 PMC6946467 · DOI · Paper page
- [18]West T, Kirmess KM, Meyer MR,. A blood-based diagnostic test incorporating plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, ApoE proteotype, and age accurately identifies brain amyloid status: findings from a multi cohort validity analysis. Mol Neurodegener. 2021; 16(1): 30. doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00451-6 33933117 PMC8088704 · DOI
- [19]Kirmess KM, Meyer MR, Holubasch MS,. The PrecivityAD test: accurate and reliable LC-MS/MS assays for quantifying plasma amyloid beta 40 and 42 and apolipoprotein E proteotype for the assessment of brain amyloidosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2021; 519: 267- 275. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.05.011 34015303 PMC10292789 · DOI
- [20]Roberts C, Kaplow J, Giroux M, Krause S, Kanekiyo M. Amyloid and APOE status of screened subjects in the Elenbecestat MissionAD phase 3 program. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021; 8(2): 218- 223. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.4 33569570 · DOI
- [22]van der Kall LM, Truong T, Burnham SC,. Association of β-amyloid level, clinical progression, and longitudinal cognitive change in normal older individuals. Neurology. 2021; 96(5): e662- e670. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011222 33184233 PMC7884996 · DOI
- [23]Insel PS, Hansson O, Mattsson-Carlgren N. Association between apolipoprotein E ε2 vs ε4, age, and β-amyloid in adults without cognitive impairment. JAMA Neurol. 2021; 78(2): 229- 235. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3780 33044487 PMC7551211 · DOI · Paper page
- [24]Mattke S, Hanson M. Expected wait times for access to a disease-modifying Alzheimer’s treatment in the United States. Alzheimers Dement. Published online September 27, 2021. doi: 10.1002/alz.12470 34569686 · DOI · Paper page
- [25]Whitwell JL, Xu J, Mandrekar JN, Gunter JL, Jack CR Jr, Josephs KA. Rates of brain atrophy and clinical decline over 6 and 12-month intervals in PSP: determining sample size for treatment trials. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012; 18(3): 252- 256. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.10.013 22079523 PMC3399183 · DOI
- [26]Villeneuve S, Rabinovici GD, Cohn-Sheehy BI,. Existing Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation. Brain. 2015; 138(Pt 7): 2020- 2033. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv112 25953778 PMC4806716 · DOI · Paper page
- [27]Amadoru S, Doré V, McLean CA,. Comparison of amyloid PET measured in Centiloid units with neuropathological findings in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020; 12(1): 22. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00587-5 32131891 PMC7057642 · DOI · Paper page
- [28]Clark CM, Pontecorvo MJ, Beach TG,; AV-45-A16 Study Group. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11(8): 669- 678. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70142-4 22749065 · DOI · Paper page
- [29]Farrell ME, Jiang S, Schultz AP,; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and the Harvard Aging Brain Study. Defining the lowest threshold for amyloid-PET to predict future cognitive decline and amyloid accumulation. Neurology. 2021; 96(4): e619- e631. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011214 33199430 PMC7905788 · DOI
- [30]Doré V, Bullich S, Rowe CC,. Comparison of 18F-florbetaben quantification results using the standard Centiloid, MR-based, and MR-less CapAIBL approaches: validation against histopathology. Alzheimers Dement. 2019; 15(6): 807- 816. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.02.005 31101517 · DOI · Paper page
- [31]Navitsky M, Joshi AD, Kennedy I,. Standardization of amyloid quantitation with florbetapir standardized uptake value ratios to the Centiloid scale. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(12): 1565- 1571. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.1353 30006100 · DOI · Paper page
- [32]Monane M, Snider J, Drake J,. Early clinical utility data of a blood biomarker test in the evaluation of patients with cognitive impairment. Innov Aging. 2021; 5(suppl 1): 1009. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab046.3585 · DOI
- Authors
- Hu, Y., Kirmess, K. M., Meyer, M. R., Rabinovici, G. D., Gatsonis, C., Siegel, B. A., Whitmer, R. A., Apgar, C., Hanna, L., Kanekiyo, M., Kaplow, J., Koyama, A., Verbel, D., Holubasch, M. S., Knapik, S. S., Connor, J., Contois, J. H., Jackson, E. N., Harpstrite, S. E., Bateman, R. J., Holtzman, D. M., Verghese, P. B., Fogelman, I., Braunstein, J. B., Yarasheski, K. E., & West, T.
- Affiliations
- C2N Diagnostics (United States) (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- American College of Radiology (US)
- Eisai (United States) (US)
- ConfluenceStat, Miami, Florida
- Corresponding author
- West, Tim
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2022-04-21
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e228392
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9024390
- OpenAlex
- W4224253520
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 16.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Alzheimer's Association
- BrightFocus Foundation (R44 AG059489, GC-201711-2013978, CA2016636)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (R44AG059489, P30AG072972)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
- Keywords
- amyloid PET, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive impairment, mild dementia, diagnostic algorithm, diagnostic accuracy, age as predictor
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Amyloidosis, Apolipoproteins E, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Peptide Fragments, Probability, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Positron-Emission Tomography, Plaque, Amyloid, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review