CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 398Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury With and Without Loss of Consciousness With Dementia in US Military Veterans

Open access
Barnes, Deborah E., Byers, Amy L., Gardner, Raquel C., Seal, Karen H., Boscardin, W. John, Yaffe, Kristine·2018·JAMA Neurology
DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0815PMC PMC6143113
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Importance: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in both veteran and civilian populations. Prior studies have linked moderate and severe TBI with increased dementia risk, but the association between dementia and mild TBI, particularly mild TBI without loss of consciousness (LOC), remains unclear. Objective: To examine the association between TBI severity, LOC, and dementia diagnosis in veterans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of all patients diagnosed with a TBI in the Veterans Health Administration health care system from October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2014, and a propensity-matched comparison group. Patients with dementia at baseline were excluded. Researchers identified TBIs through the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation database, which is restricted to Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, and the National Patient Care Database, which includes veterans of all eras. The severity of each TBI was based on the most severe injury recorded and classified as mild without LOC, mild with LOC, mild with LOC status unknown, or moderate or severe using Department of Defense or Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center criteria. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify dementia diagnoses during follow-up and medical and psychiatric comorbidities in the 2 years prior to the index date. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dementia diagnosis in veterans who had experienced TBI with or without LOC and control participants without TBI exposure. Results: The study included 178 779 patients diagnosed with a TBI in the Veterans Health Administration health care system and 178 779 patients in a propensity-matched comparison group. Veterans had a mean (SD) age of nearly 49.5 (18.2) years at baseline; 33 250 (9.3%) were women, and 259 136 (72.5%) were non-Hispanic white individuals. Differences between veterans with and without TBI were small. A total of 4698 veterans (2.6%) without TBI developed dementia compared with 10 835 (6.1%) of those with TBI. After adjustment for demographics and medical and psychiatric comobidities, adjusted hazard ratios for dementia were 2.36 (95% CI, 2.10-2.66) for mild TBI without LOC, 2.51 (95% CI, 2.29-2.76) for mild TBI with LOC, 3.19 (95% CI, 3.05-3.33) for mild TBI with LOC status unknown, and 3.77 (95% CI, 3.63-3.91) for moderate to severe TBI. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of more than 350 000 veterans, even mild TBI without LOC was associated with more than a 2-fold increase in the risk of dementia diagnosis. Studies of strategies to determine mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of TBI-related dementia in veterans are urgently needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0815

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Barnes, D. E., Byers, A. L., Gardner, R. C., Seal, K. H., Boscardin, W. J., & Yaffe, K.
Affiliations
San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
75
Issue
9
Pages
1055
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0815
PMC
PMC6143113
OpenAlex
W2802173280
Cited by
398
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23
FWCI
30.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, dementia, loss of consciousness, military veterans, TBI severity, Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, dementia risk, psychiatric comorbidity, cognitive impairment, war injuries, neurodegeneration, depression, alcoholism, substance use disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Concussion, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Unconsciousness, United States, Veterans, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review