Cited by 617Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

Antipsychotics, Other Psychotropics, and the Risk of Death in Patients With Dementia: Number Needed to Harm

Open access
Maust, Donovan T., Kim, Hyungjin Myra, Seyfried, Lisa S., Chiang, Claire, Kavanagh, Janet, Schneider, Lon S., Kales, Helen C.·2015·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Antipsychotic medications are associated with increased mortality in older adults with dementia, yet their absolute effect on risk relative to no treatment or an alternative psychotropic is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the absolute mortality risk increase and number needed to harm (NNH) (ie, number of patients who receive treatment that would be associated with 1 death) of antipsychotic, valproic acid and its derivatives, and antidepressant use in patients with dementia relative to either no treatment or antidepressant treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in the Veterans Health Administration from October 1, 1998, through September 30, 2009. Participants included 90,786 patients 65 years or older with a diagnosis of dementia. Final analyses were conducted in August 2014. EXPOSURES: A new prescription for an antipsychotic (haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone), valproic acid and its derivatives, or an antidepressant (46,008 medication users). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Absolute change in mortality risk and NNH over 180 days of follow-up in medication users compared with nonmedication users matched on several risk factors. Among patients in whom a treatment with medication was initiated, mortality risk associated with each agent was also compared using the antidepressant group as the reference, adjusting for age, sex, years with dementia, presence of delirium, and other clinical and demographic characteristics. Secondary analyses compared dose-adjusted absolute change in mortality risk for olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone. RESULTS: Compared with respective matched nonusers, individuals receiving haloperidol had an increased mortality risk of 3.8% (95% CI, 1.0%-6.6%; P < .01) with an NNH of 26 (95% CI, 15-99); followed by risperidone, 3.7% (95% CI, 2.2%-5.3%; P < .01) with an NNH of 27 (95% CI, 19-46); olanzapine, 2.5% (95% CI, 0.3%-4.7%; P = .02) with an NNH of 40 (95% CI, 21-312); and quetiapine, 2.0% (95% CI, 0.7%-3.3%; P < .01) with an NNH of 50 (95% CI, 30-150). Compared with antidepressant users, mortality risk ranged from 12.3% (95% CI, 8.6%-16.0%; P < .01) with an NNH of 8 (95% CI, 6-12) for haloperidol users to 3.2% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.9%; P < .01) with an NNH of 31 (95% CI, 21-62) for quetiapine users. As a group, the atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone) showed a dose-response increase in mortality risk, with 3.5% greater mortality (95% CI, 0.5%-6.5%; P = .02) in the high-dose subgroup relative to the low-dose group. When compared directly with quetiapine, dose-adjusted mortality risk was increased with both risperidone (1.7%; 95% CI, 0.6%-2.8%; P = .003) and olanzapine (1.5%; 95% CI, 0.02%-3.0%; P = .047). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The absolute effect of antipsychotics on mortality in elderly patients with dementia may be higher than previously reported and increases with dose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3018

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk of stroke and death in people with dementia.

    “Research has shown that antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk of stroke and death in individuals with dementia.56,57”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [57]

    The paper’s Importance and Conclusions passages report increased mortality associated with antipsychotic use in older adults with dementia. Its background also reports increased cerebrovascular adverse events in pooled trials, but the passages do not specifically identify stroke as an outcome, so the stroke portion is not fully verified. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is an association between mortality and antipsychotics in patients with dementia.

    “There is an association between mortality and antipsychotics in patients with dementia650 but it is unclear how this should be managed for patients with BD.”
  • A review and analysis of nonpharmacologic treatments for agitation and aggression in people with dementia concluded that non-drug interventions seemed to be more effective than pharmacologic interventions for reducing aggression and agitation.

    “For example, a review and analysis of nonpharmacologic treatments for agitation and aggression in people with dementia concluded that non‐drug interventions seemed to be more effective than pharmacologic interventions for reducing aggression and agitation.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [69]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maust, D. T., Kim, H. M., Seyfried, L. S., Chiang, C., Kavanagh, J., Schneider, L. S., & Kales, H. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
438
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090527899
Cited by
617
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 19
FWCI
37.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K08AG048321, P50AG005142, P30AG024824)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH08107-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
antipsychotic drugs, dementia, mortality risk, number needed to harm, valproic acid, antidepressants, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, psychotropic drugs, older adults, veterans, adverse drug reactions, delirium, dose adjustment, Veterans Health Administration
MeSH terms
Quetiapine Fumarate, Olanzapine, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Benzodiazepines, Dementia, Dibenzothiazepines, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Haloperidol, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotropic Drugs, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Antipsychotic Agents, United States, Veterans, Case-Control Studies, Risperidone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review