Cited by 93Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGene expression and cancer classificationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

RNA‐seq Data: Challenges in and Recommendations for Experimental Design and Analysis

Open access
Williams, Alexander G., Thomas, Sean, Wyman, Stacia K., Holloway, Alisha K.·2014·Current Protocols in Human Genetics

Abstract

RNA‐seq is widely used to determine differential expression of genes or transcripts as well as identify novel transcripts, identify allele‐specific expression, and precisely measure translation of transcripts. Thoughtful experimental design and choice of analysis tools are critical to ensure high‐quality data and interpretable results. Important considerations for experimental design include number of replicates, whether to collect paired‐end or single‐end reads, sequence length, and sequencing depth. Common analysis steps in all RNA‐seq experiments include quality control, read alignment, assigning reads to genes or transcripts, and estimating gene or transcript abundance. Our aims are two‐fold: to make recommendations for common components of experimental design and assess tool capabilities for each of these steps. We also test tools designed to detect differential expression, since this is the most widespread application of RNA‐seq. We hope that these analyses will help guide those who are new to RNA‐seq and will generate discussion about remaining needs for tool improvement and development. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 83:11.13.1‐11.13.20. © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/0471142905.hg1113s83

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If the main purpose of the analysis is to identify new transcripts, or examine allele-specific expression, higher depth of coverage is desirable.

    “However, if the main purpose of the analysis is to identify new transcripts, or examine allele-specific expression, the higher depth of coverage is desirable [7–9]”

    From Multi-omics approaches to disease (2017) · cites this paper as [9]

  • To identify differentially expressed genes between cases and controls, the power provided by more samples is generally preferable to the increased accuracy provided by higher depth of sequencing.

    “To identify differentially expressed genes between the cases and controls, the power provided by more samples is generally preferable to the increased accuracy provided by higher depth of sequencing.”

    From Multi-omics approaches to disease (2017) · cites this paper as [9]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, A. G., Thomas, S., Wyman, S. K., & Holloway, A. K.
Affiliations
Gladstone Institutes (US)
Venue
Current Protocols in Human Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
11.13.1-20
ISSN
  • 1934-8258 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-8266
OpenAlex
W1501862196
Cited by
93
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Protocols in Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL098188)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
RNA-seq, experimental design, differential gene expression, sequencing depth, number of replications, read mapping, gene expression quantification, quality control, allele-specific expression
MeSH terms
Quality Control, RNA Splicing, RNA, Messenger, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, RNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review