Cited by 616Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Revisiting Global Gene Expression Analysis

Open access
Lovén, Jakob, Orlando, David A., Sigova, Alla A., Lin, Charles Y., Rahl, Peter B., Burge, Christopher B., Levens, David L., Lee, Tong Ihn +1 more·2012·Cell

Abstract

Gene expression analysis is a widely used and powerful method for investigating the transcriptional behavior of biological systems, for classifying cell states in disease, and for many other purposes. Recent studies indicate that common assumptions currently embedded in experimental and analytical practices can lead to misinterpretation of global gene expression data. We discuss these assumptions and describe solutions that should minimize erroneous interpretation of gene expression data from multiple analysis platforms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.012

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calibration techniques such as spike-in normalization in RNA-seq and ChIP-seq have made absolute quantification of genomics experiments possible.

    “This is an intrinsic limitation of all genomics methods, in which the signal is quantified from sequencing read counts, but calibration techniques such as spike-in normalization in RNA-seq52 and ChIP-seq53–55 have made absolute quantification of genomics experiments possible.”

    From Genome-wide absolute quantification of chromatin looping (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Experimental Approach and Implications sections (pages unavailable) show that RNA spike-ins let the authors normalize RNA-seq data to cell number and detect changes in transcript levels more accurately. This supports the RNA-seq calibration point, but the paper does not establish absolute quantification of genomics experiments generally; the ChIP-seq portion is attributed to other citations. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Normalization of technical library-to-library differences is a prerequisite for further analysis in scRNA-seq.

    “As in bulk RNA-seq51, normalization of technical library-to-library differences is a prerequisite for further analysis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lovén, J., Orlando, D. A., Sigova, A. A., Lin, C. Y., Rahl, P. B., Burge, C. B., Levens, D. L., Lee, T. I., & Young, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, Tong Ihn
  • Young, Richard A.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
151
Issue
3
Pages
476-482
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147109452
Cited by
616
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Elsevier eBooks
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • Vetenskapsrådet (VR-B0086301)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG002668, R01HG002439, R01HG002668)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA146445, R01CA146445)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
gene expression data interpretation, cell state classification
MeSH terms
Humans, Transcription, Genetic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review