Cited by 194Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatoninIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Light therapy for improving cognition, activities of daily living, sleep, challenging behaviour, and psychiatric disturbances in dementia

Open access
Forbes, Dorothy, Blake, Catherine M, Thiessen, Emily J, Peacock, Shelley, Hawranik, Pamela·2014·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rest-activity and sleep-wake cycles are controlled by the endogenous circadian rhythm generated by the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus. Degenerative changes in the SCN appear to be a biological basis for circadian disturbances in people with dementia, and might be reversed by stimulation of the SCN by light. OBJECTIVES: The review examines the effectiveness of light therapy in improving cognition, activities of daily living (ADLs), sleep, challenging behaviour, and psychiatric symptoms associated with dementia. SEARCH METHODS: ALOIS, the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG), The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and LILACS were searched on 20 January 2014 using the terms: "bright light*", "light box*", "light visor*", "dawn-dusk*", phototherapy, "photo therapy", "light therapy" "light treatment", light* . The CDCIG Specialized Register contains records from all major healthcare databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS) as well as from many trials databases and grey literature sources. SELECTION CRITERIA: All relevant, randomized controlled trials were included in which light therapy, at any intensity and duration, was compared with a control group for the effect of improving cognition, ADLs, sleep, challenging behaviour, and psychiatric symptoms associated with dementia (as well as institutionalization rates or cost of care). Included were people with dementia of any type and degree of severity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the retrieved articles for relevance, and four review authors independently assessed the selected studies for risk of bias and extracted the data. Statistically significant differences in outcomes between the treatment and control groups at the end of treatment and follow-up were examined. Each study was summarized using a measure of effect (for example mean difference). MAIN RESULTS: Eleven trials (13 articles) met the inclusion criteria. However, three of the studies could not be included in the analyses either because the reported data could not be used in the meta-analysis or we were unable to retrieve the required data from the authors.This updated review found no effect of light therapy on cognitive function, sleep, challenging behaviour (for example agitation), or psychiatric symptoms associated with dementia. Reduction in the development of ADL limitations was reported in one study, at three of five time points, and light therapy was found to have an effect after six weeks and two years but not after one year. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to justify the use of bright light therapy in dementia. Further research should concentrate on replicating the suggested effect on ADLs, and establishing the biological mechanism for how light therapy improves these important outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003946.pub4

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Lyketsos 1999 {published data only} Lyketsos CG, Veiel LL, Baker A, Steele C. A randomized, controlled trial of bright light therapy for agitated behaviors in dementia patients residing in long-term care. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 1999;14(7):520-5.
  2. Nowak 2008 {published data only} Nowak L. The effect of timed blue-green light on sleep-wake patterns in women with Alzheimer's disease. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2008;69(6-B):1-154.
  3. McCurry SM, Logsdon RG, Gibbon LE, Vitiello MV, Teri L. Behavioral treatment for sleep disturbances in Alzheimer's Disease: The Nite-AD study. Research and Practice in Alzheimer's Disease 2006;11:341-6.
  4. creutzfeldt or jcd or cjd).mp. 17. huntington*.mp. 18. binswanger*.mp. 19. korsako*.mp. 20. or/1-19 21. light*.ti,ab. 22. Phototherapy/ 23. phototherapy.ti,ab. 24. "photo therapy".ti,ab. 25. "dawn-dusk*".ti,ab. 26. or/21-25 27. randomized controlled trial.pt. 28. controlled clinical trial.pt. 29. randomi?ed.ab. Nov 2012: 107 Jan 2014: 25 Light therapy for improving cognition, activities of daily living, sleep, challenging behaviour, and psychiatric disturbances in dementia (Review) Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 30. placebo.ab. 31. randomly.ab. 32. trial.ab. 33. groups.ab. 34. or/27-33 35. (animals not (humans and animals)).sh. 36. 34 not 35 37. 20 and 26 and 36
  5. W H A T ' S N E W Light therapy for improving cognition, activities of daily living, sleep, challenging behaviour, and psychiatric disturbances in dementia (Review) Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forbes, D., Blake, C. M., Thiessen, E. J., Peacock, S., & Hawranik, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Athabasca University (CA)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-26
Volume
2014
Issue
2
Pages
CD003946-CD003946
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2150283528
Cited by
194
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
phototherapy, dementia, circadian rhythm, suprachiasmatic nucleus, sleep-wake cycle, cognitive function, activities of daily living, behavioral problems, agitation, psychiatric symptoms, institutionalization, cost of care, anxiety, delirium, caregiver burden, risk of bias, risk of overstatement
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Depression, Humans, Phototherapy, Psychomotor Agitation, Sleep Wake Disorders, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review