Cited by 73Climate Change and GeoengineeringAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsClimate variability and models

The climatic effects of modifying cirrus clouds in a climate engineering framework

Open access
Muri, H., Kristjánsson, J. E., Storelvmo, T., Pfeffer, M. A.·2014·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The climatic effects of climate engineering—or geoengineering—via cirrus cloud thinning are examined. Thinner cirrus clouds can allow more outgoing longwave radiation to escape to space, potentially cooling the climate. The cloud properties and climatic effects due to perturbing the ice crystal fall speed are investigated in a set of hemispheric scale sensitivity experiments with the Community Earth System Model. It is found that increasing the ice crystal fall speed, as an analog to cirrus cloud seeding, depletes high‐level clouds and reduces the longwave cloud forcing. Deliberate depletion of cirrus clouds increases outgoing longwave radiation, reduces the upper tropospheric water vapor, and cools the climate. Global cirrus cloud thinning gave a net cloud forcing change of −1.55 W m −2 and a global annual mean temperature change of −0.94 K. Though there is negligible change in the global annual mean precipitation (−0.001 mm/d), the spatially nonhomogeneous forcing induces circulation changes and hence remote climate changes. Climate engineering the Southern Hemisphere only results in a northward shift of the Intertropical Convergence Zone and possible Sahelian drought alleviation, while targeting the Northern Hemisphere alone causes a greater cooling. It was found that targeting cirrus clouds everywhere outside of the tropics results in changes to the circulation and precipitation even in the nonclimate engineered regions, underscoring the risks of remote side effects and indeed the complexity of the climate system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013jd021063

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aerosols used in solar geoengineering may impact cirrus cloud formation once they descend into the upper troposphere.

    “Aerosols used in SG may impact cirrus cloud formation once they descend into the upper troposphere 37,38 .”

    From Experimental reaction rates constrain estimates of ozone response to calcium carbonate geoengineering (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Introduction says that introducing ice nuclei can alter cirrus-cloud formation and separately identifies stratospheric sulfur injections as a solar radiation management method. It does not say that aerosols used for solar geoengineering descend into the upper troposphere or affect cirrus formation after doing so. The Experiment Design section describes upper-tropospheric ice nuclei as a proposed cirrus-seeding mechanism, not as descending solar-geoengineering aerosols. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Black, R. X. (2002), Stratospheric forcing of surface climate in the Arctic Oscillation, J. Clim., 15, 268-277. · DOI
  2. Jakob, C. (2002), Ice clouds in numerical weather prediction models-Progress, problems and prospects, in Cirrus, edited by D. K. Lynch et al., pp. 327-345, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
  3. Liu, X., et al. (2011), Toward a minimal representation of aerosol direct and indirect effects: Model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 4(4), 3485-3598, doi:10.5194/gmdd-4-3485-2011. · DOI
  4. Mitchell, D. L., S. Chai, Y. Liu, A. J. Heymsfield, and Y. Y. Dong (1996), Modeling cirrus clouds. Part I: Treatment of bimodal size spectra and case study analysis, J. Atmos. Sci., 53(20), 2952-2966.
  5. Wang, C. (2005), The Hadley Circulation: Present, Past, and Future, pp. 173-202, chap. ENSO, Atlantic climate variability, and the Walker and Hadley circulations, Kluwer Acad., Dordrecht, Netherlands.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muri, H., Kristjánsson, J. E., Storelvmo, T., & Pfeffer, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Icelandic Meteorological Office (IS)
Corresponding author
Muri, H.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2014-04-09
Volume
119
Issue
7
Pages
4174-4191
ISSN
  • 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-897X
  • 2169-8996
OpenAlex
W2027997491
Cited by
73
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Seventh Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
cirrus cloud thinning, solar geoengineering, longwave cloud forcing, outgoing longwave radiation, upper tropospheric water vapor, global cooling, Intertropical Convergence Zone, Sahelian drought, atmospheric circulation changes, precipitation change, geoengineering risks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review