Cited by 25Climate Change and GeoengineeringSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Visions of Climate Control: Solar Radiation Management in Climate Simulations

Wiertz, Thilo·2016·Science, Technology, & Human Values

Abstract

Various geoengineering technologies that would deliberately alter the climate system have been proposed as a way to alleviate risks of global warming. Technologies that would shield incoming sunlight to cool the planet, so called solar radiation management (SRM), are particularly controversial. Considering insights from social studies of simulation modeling and research on expectations in science and technology, I argue that climate modeling has a central role in producing visions of SRM. I draw upon an empirical analysis of scientific research on SRM to examine how a creative play with technological ideas becomes possible through climate modeling. This enables scientists to project and study environmental impacts of speculative SRM methods in virtual experiments and to develop and refine ideas for adjusting sunlight. Hence, while climate models are used to improve scientific understandings of climate system behavior and to anticipate possible environmental impacts of SRM, they also become inventive tools, allowing scientists to envision novel ways of climate control and optimization. Given the importance of simulation studies to knowledge production on SRM, I critically reflect on the challenges that arise when visions about an engineered climate future are first and foremost produced in climate simulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0162243915606524

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SAI will not necessarily perfectly result in desired design outcomes.

    “nor will SAI necessarily perfectly result in desired 'design' outcomes (Wiertz, 2016; McLaren, 2018).”
  • Neatly framed and optimized objectives found in modeling will not necessarily be reflected in messy and contested real-life preferences.

    “Neatly framed and optimized objectives found in modeling will not necessarily be reflected in messy and contested real life preferences, nor will SAI necessarily perfectly result in desired 'design' outcomes (Wiertz, 2016; McLaren, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiertz, T.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Wiertz, Thilo
Venue
Science, Technology, & Human Values
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
438-460
ISSN
  • 0162-2439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8251
OpenAlex
W2313499213
Cited by
25
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science Technology & Human Values (publishedVersion)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
solar radiation management, geoengineering, climate modeling, climate control, simulation study, future vision, climate change mitigation, knowledge production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review