Cited by 57Climate Change and GeoengineeringAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Cirrus cloud seeding: a climate engineering mechanism with reduced side effects?

Storelvmo, T., Boos, W. R., Herger, N.·2014·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Climate engineering, the intentional alteration of Earth's climate, is a multifaceted and controversial topic. Numerous climate engineering mechanisms (CEMs) have been proposed, and the efficacies and potential undesired consequences of some of them have been studied in the safe environments of numerical models. Here, we present a global modelling study of a so far understudied CEM, namely the seeding of cirrus clouds to reduce their lifetimes in the upper troposphere, and hence their greenhouse effect. Different from most CEMs, the intention of cirrus seeding is not to reduce the amount of solar radiation reaching Earth's surface. This particular CEM rather targets the greenhouse effect, by reducing the trapping of infrared radiation by high clouds. This avoids some of the caveats that have been identified for solar radiation management, for example, the delayed recovery of stratospheric ozone or drastic changes to Earth's hydrological cycle. We find that seeding of mid- and high-latitude cirrus clouds has the potential to cool the planet by about 1.4 K, and that this cooling is accompanied by only a modest reduction in rainfall. Intriguingly, seeding of the 15% of the globe with the highest solar noon zenith angles at any given time yields the same global mean cooling as a seeding strategy that involves 45% of the globe. In either case, the cooling is strongest at high latitudes, and could therefore serve to prevent Arctic sea ice loss. With the caveat that there are still significant uncertainties associated with ice nucleation in cirrus clouds and its representation in climate models, cirrus seeding appears to represent a powerful CEM with reduced side effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2014.0116

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primary candidate methods for geoengineering are marine cloud brightening, cirrus thinning, and stratospheric aerosol injection.

    “The primary candidate methods for geoengineering are marine cloud brightening [396] (making low-lying clouds more reflective), cirrus thinning [759] (making high-flying clouds trap less heat), and stratospheric aerosol injection [668] (which we discuss below).”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [759]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Storelvmo, T., Boos, W. R., & Herger, N.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Storelvmo, T.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2014-12-28
Volume
372
Issue
2031
Pages
20140116
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W2159425335
Cited by
57
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • 2017 AAAS Annual Meeting (February 16-20, 2017)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
geoengineering, greenhouse effect, global climate modeling, ice nucleation, Arctic sea ice decline, global cooling, rainfall reduction, high-latitude cooling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review