Cited by 59Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Development of Executive Function across the Life Span

Jacques, Sophie, Marcovitch, Stuart·2010·The Handbook of Life‐Span Development

Abstract

We present an overview of life span changes in the core executive function (EF) processes of working memory, response control, and set-shifting/cognitive flexibility—cognitive abilities necessary for the voluntary control of thought and action. Following this review of empirical findings, we describe two basic approaches (viz. representational and componential models) taken to account for EF at various points in development. We then present an integrated developmental model of EF by identifying features that the three processes should possess based on features already identified across different models, and we review additional empirical findings in light of this integrated model. We conclude by identifying outstanding issues that any comprehensive theory of EF will need to address.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470880166.hlsd001013

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lifespan studies from middle childhood into late adulthood have typically revealed both the rise and the fall of executive function.

    “Nonetheless, lifespan studies from middle childhood into late adulthood have typically revealed both the rise and the fall of EF (Bialystok & Craik, 2010; Jacques & Marcovitch, 2010; Salthouse & Davis, 2006).”

    From NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Validation of Executive Function Measures in Adults (2014) · cites this paper as Jacques & Marcovitch, 2010

  • Across the lifespan, executive function appears to follow an inverted-U-shaped curve, rising and then falling.

    “Developmental research on EF has revealed that when considered across the lifespan, EF appears to follow an inverted-U-shaped curve, rising and then falling (see Jacques & Marcovitch, 2010, for a review).”

    From NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Validation of Executive Function Measures in Adults (2014) · cites this paper as Jacques & Marcovitch, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacques, S., & Marcovitch, S.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Venue
The Handbook of Life‐Span Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-26
OpenAlex
W1481548981
Cited by
59
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
executive function, lifespan development, working memory, response control, set-shifting, cognitive flexibility, representational models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review