Cited by 27Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Cortical activation during sleep predicts dream experience in narcolepsy

Open access
D'Atri, Aurora, Scarpelli, Serena, Schiappa, Cinzia, Pizza, Fabio, Vandi, Stefano, Ferrara, Michele, Cipolli, Carlo, Plazzi, Giuseppe +1 more·2019·Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Narcolepsy type 1 widely affects the architecture of sleep with frequent fast transition to REM sleep at both nighttime and daytime sleep onset. The occurrence of repeated sleep onset REM periods over the Multiple Sleep Latency Test offers a unique opportunity to identify EEG patterns predictive of successful dream recall after short periods composed of only REM or NREM sleep. It also permits to disentangle state- from trait-like differences in dream recall, by using a within-subjects design. Methods: A consecutive series of 115 first-diagnosed drug-free adult narcolepsy-type 1 patients underwent Multiple Sleep Latency Tests and were asked after each nap opportunity if they had or had not a dream experience. Scalp EEG power and a specific index of cortical activation (delta/beta power ratio), obtained from naps of 43 patients with both presence and absence of dream recall in the same sleep stage, were compared separately for REM and NREM sleep. Results: Successful dream recall was associated with an increased EEG desynchronization in both REM and NREM over partially overlapping cortical areas. Compared to unsuccessful recall, it showed (1) lower delta power over centro-parietal areas during both stages, (2) higher beta power in the same cortical areas during NREM, and (3) lower values in the delta/beta ratio during NREM in most scalp locations. Interpretation: A more activated electrophysiological milieu in both REM and NREM sleep promotes dream recall, strengthening the notion that the parietal areas are crucial not only in generating dream experience, as shown in brain-damaged patients, but also in the memory processing leading to recall.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acn3.718

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Theta activity and EEG characterized by high cortical activation appear crucial in the production and retrieval of DE.

    “Once again, the theta activity (Marquis et al., 2017) and the EEG characterized by high cortical activation (Simor et al., 2013; D'Atri et al., 2019) appear to be crucial in the production and retrieval of DE.”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as D'Atri et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [12]Vogel GW. Mentation reported from naps of narcoleptics. Adv Sleep Res 1976; 3: 161– 168.
  2. [21]Krystal AD. Non‐REM sleep EEG spectral analysis in insomnia. Psychiatr Ann 2008; 38: 615– 620.
  3. [36]Charney DS, Soldatos CR, Bixler EO, Kales A. Factors contributing to dream recall in insomniac subjects. Sleep Res 1977; 6: 126.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Atri, A., Scarpelli, S., Schiappa, C., Pizza, F., Vandi, S., Ferrara, M., Cipolli, C., Plazzi, G., & De Gennaro, L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology University of Rome “Sapienza” Rome Italy
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT)
  • Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences University of L'Aquila L'Aquila Italy
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Venue
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
445-455
ISSN
2328-9503 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914213838
Cited by
27
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Fundação Bial (#32/16)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
narcolepsy type 1, dream recall, REM sleep, NREM sleep, cortical activation, EEG desynchronization, parietal cortex, sleep onset REM periods, multiple sleep latency test
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Dreams, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Narcolepsy, Mental Recall, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Sleep Stages, Sleep, REM, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review