Cited by 281Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The effects of tests on learning and forgetting.

Open access
Carpenter, Shana K., Pashler, Harold, Wixted, John T., Vul, Edward·2008·Memory & Cognition

Abstract

In three experiments, we investigated whether memory tests enhance learning and reduce forgetting more than additional study opportunities do. Subjects learned obscure facts (Experiments 1 and 2) or Swahili-English word pairs (Experiment 3) by either completing a test with feedback (test/study) or receiving an additional study opportunity (study). Recall was tested after 5 min or 1, 2, 7, 14, or 42 days. We explored forgetting by means of an ANOVA and also by fitting a power function to the data. In all three experiments, testing enhanced overall recall more than restudying did. According to the power function, in two out of three experiments, testing also reduced forgetting more than restudying did, although this was not always the case according to the ANOVA. We discuss the implications of these results both for approaches to measuring forgetting and for the use of tests in promoting long-term retention. The stimuli used in these experiments may be found at www.psychonomic.org/archive.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/mc.36.2.438

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the longer term (from several hours up to a week after learning), the benefits of retrieval practice tend to outweigh those arising from restudy.

    “In the longer-term (e.g. from several hours up to a week after learning), by contrast, the benefits of retrieval practice tend to outweigh those arising from restudy [3,4].”

    From Sleep bolsters schematically incongruent memories (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
  2. Izawa, C. (1992). Test trials contributions to optimization of learning processes: Study/test trials interactions. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), Essays in honor of William K. Estes: Vol. 2. From learning processes to cognitive processes (pp. 1-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Carpenter, Shana K.
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
2008-03
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
438-448
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W2024462452
Cited by
281
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
testing effect, retrieval practice, forgetting, restudying, long-term retention, memory retrieval, feedback, word learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paired-Associate Learning, Practice, Psychological, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review