Cited by 29Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismMemory Processes and InfluencesLanguage Development and Disorders

Retrieval practice and spacing effects in multi-session treatment of naming impairment in aphasia

Open access
Middleton, Erica L., Rawson, Katherine A., Verkuilen, Jay·2019·Cortex

Abstract

Retrieval practice and spacing are two factors shown to enhance learning in basic psychological research. The present study investigated the clinical applicability of these factors to naming treatment in aphasia. Prior studies have shown that naming treatment that provides retrieval practice (i.e., practice retrieving names for objects from semantic memory) improves later naming performance in people with aphasia (PWA) more so than repetition training. Repetition training is a common form of naming treatment that can support errorless production of names for objects, but it does not provide retrieval practice. Prior work has also demonstrated enhanced naming treatment benefit in PWA when an item's training trials are separated by multiple intervening trials (i.e., spacing) compared to only one intervening trial (i.e., massing). However, in those studies, items were only trained in one session. Also, the effects of the learning factors were probed after one day and one week. The goal of the present study was to examine the effects of retrieval practice and spacing in a more clinically-inspired schedule of delivery and to assess the effects of the learning factors at retention intervals of greater functional significance. Matched sets of errorful items for each of four PWA were presented for multiple trials of retrieval practice or repetition in a spaced or massed schedule in each of multiple training sessions. Mixed regression analyses revealed that retrieval practice outperformed repetition, and spacing outperformed massing, at an initial post-treatment test administered after one week. Furthermore, the advantage for retrieval practice over repetition persisted at a follow-up test administered after one month. The potential clinical relevance of retrieval practice and spacing for multi-session interventions in speech-language treatment is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.003

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Middleton EL (2019, 2 26). Retrieval practice and spacing effects in multi-session treatment of naming impairment in aphasia. Retrieved from osf.io/cwq75 PMC6783359 31408823

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Middleton, E. L., Rawson, K. A., & Verkuilen, J.
Affiliations
  • Moss Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
Corresponding author
Middleton, Erica L.
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
119
Pages
386-400
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2958789462
Cited by
29
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
retrieval practice, spacing effect, aphasia, naming impairment, object naming, repetition training, semantic memory, speech therapy, retention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aphasia, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Names, Mental Recall, Verbal Learning, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review