Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Contribution of DOPA to Substrate–Peptide Adhesion and Internal Cohesion of Mussel‐Inspired Synthetic Peptide Films

Open access
Anderson, Travers H., Yu, Jing, Estrada, Abril, Hammer, Malte U., Waite, J. Herbert, Israelachvili, Jacob N.·2010·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Mussels use a variety of 3, 4‐dihydroxyphenyl‐L‐alanine (DOPA) rich proteins specifically tailored to adhering to wet surfaces. Synthetic polypeptide analogues of adhesive mussel foot proteins (specifically mfp‐3) are used to study the role of DOPA in adhesion. The mussel‐inspired peptide is a random copolymer of DOPA and N 5‐ (2‐hydroxyethyl)‐L‐glutamine synthesized with DOPA concentrations of 0–27 mol% and molecular weights of 5.9–7.1 kDa. Thin films (3–5 nm thick) of the mussel‐inspired peptide are used in the surface forces apparatus (SFA) to measure the force–distance profiles and adhesion and cohesion energies of the films in an acetate buffer. The adhesion energies of the mussel‐inspired peptide films to mica and TiO 2 surfaces increase with DOPA concentration. The adhesion energy to mica is 0.09 μJ m−2 mol DOPA−1 and does not depend on contact time or load. The adhesion energy to TiO 2 is 0.29 μJ m−2 mol DOPA−1 for short contact times and increases to 0.51 μJ m−2 mol DOPA−1 for contact times >60 min in a way suggestive of a phase transition within the film. Oxidation of DOPA to the quinone form, either by addition of periodate or by increasing the pH, increases the thickness and reduces the cohesion of the films. Adding thiol containing polymers between the oxidized films recovers some of the cohesion strength. Comparison of the mussel‐inspired peptide films to previous studies on mfp‐3 thin films show that the strong adhesion and cohesion in mfp‐3 films can be attributed to DOPA groups favorably oriented within or at the interface of these films.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201000932

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, T. H., Yu, J., Estrada, A., Hammer, M. U., Waite, J. H., & Israelachvili, J. N.
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-09
Volume
20
Issue
23
Pages
4196-4205
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2167979615
Cited by
365
References
35
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Contribution of DOPA to Substrate–Peptide Adhesion and Internal Cohesion of Mussel‐Inspired Synthetic Peptide Films. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201000932
The paper
Anderson, T. H., Yu, J., Estrada, A., Hammer, M. U., Waite, J. H., & Israelachvili, J. N. (2010). The Contribution of DOPA to Substrate–Peptide Adhesion and Internal Cohesion of Mussel‐Inspired Synthetic Peptide Films. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201000932

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.