Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Liquid Bandage Harvests Robust Adhesive, Hemostatic, and Antibacterial Performances as a First‐Aid Tissue Adhesive

Ma, Yufei, Yao, Jingxuan, Liu, Qian, Han, Ting, Zhao, Jiping, Ma, Xiaohua, Tong, Yingmu, Jin, Guorui, Qu, Kai, Li, Baoqiang, Xu, Feng·2020·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Massive bleeding and wound infection after tissue trauma are the major dangerous factors of casualties in disasters; hence, first‐aid supplies that can greatly achieve wound closure and effectively control the hemorrhage and infection are urgently needed. Although existing tissue adhesives can adhere to the tissue surfaces and achieve rapid wound closure, most of them have limited hemostatic and antibacterial capacities, making them unsuitable as the first‐aid tissue adhesives. In this study, inspired by the inherent hemostatic and antibacterial capacities of chitosan and the excellent tissue integration capacity originating from a Schiff base reaction, liquid bandage (LBA), an in situ imine crosslinking‐based photoresponsive chitosan hydrogel (NB‐CMC/CMC hydrogel), is developed for emergency wound management. Upon UV irradiation, o‐nitrobenzene in modified carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) converts to o‐nitrosobenzaldehyde that subsequently crosslinks with amino groups on tissue surface, which endows the LBA with superior tissue adhesive performance. LBA's hemostatic and antibacterial properties can be tuned by the mass ratio of NB‐CMC/CMC. Moreover, it exhibits satisfactory biocompatibility, biodegradability, and the capability to enhance wound healing process. This study sheds new light on the development of a multifunctional hydrogel‐based first‐aid tissue adhesive that can achieve robust tissue adhesion, effectively control bleeding, prevent bacterial infection, and promote wound healing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.202001820

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Ma, Y., Yao, J., Liu, Q., Han, T., Zhao, J., Ma, X., Tong, Y., Jin, G., Qu, K., Li, B., & Xu, F.
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-12
Volume
30
Issue
39
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W3049432232
Cited by
243
References
5
FWCI
30.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liquid Bandage Harvests Robust Adhesive, Hemostatic, and Antibacterial Performances as a First‐Aid Tissue Adhesive. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.202001820
The paper
Ma, Y., Yao, J., Liu, Q., Han, T., Zhao, J., Ma, X., Tong, Y., Jin, G., Qu, K., Li, B., & Xu, F. (2020). Liquid Bandage Harvests Robust Adhesive, Hemostatic, and Antibacterial Performances as a First‐Aid Tissue Adhesive. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202001820

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.