The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glucose Detection Devices and Methods Based on Metal–Organic Frameworks and Related Materials
Open accessAbstract
Assessment of glucose concentration is important in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes. Since the introduction of enzymatic glucose biosensors, scientific and technological advances in nanomaterials have led to the development of new generations of glucose sensors. This field has witnessed major developments over the last decade, as the novel nanomaterials are capable of efficiently catalyzing glucose directly (i.e., act as artificial enzymes, therefore defined nanozymes) or to entrap enzymes that are able to oxidize glucose. Among other nanomaterials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have recently provided a tremendous basis to construct glucose sensing devices. MOFs are large porous crystalline compounds with versatile structural and tuneable chemical properties. In addition, they possess catalytic, peroxidase‐like, and electrochemical redox activity. This review comprehensively summarizes the general characteristics of MOFs, their subtypes, and MOF composites, as well as MOF‐derived materials employed to construct electrochemical, optical, transistor, and microfluidic devices for the detection of glucose. They include enzymatic, nonenzymatic, wearable, and flexible sensing devices and methods. The review also outlines the design and synthesis of MOFs and the working principles of the different transduction‐based glucose sensors and highlights the current challenges and future perspectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saeedi, P., Petersohn, I., Salpea, P., Malanda, B., Karuranga, S., Unwin, N., Colagiuri, S., Guariguata, L., Motala, A. A., Ogurtsova, K., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843 · Cited by 10,792
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Chaotic Mixer for Microchannels
Stroock, A. D., Dertinger, S. K. W., Ajdari, A., Mezić, I., Stone, H. A., & Whitesides, G. M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066238 · Cited by 3,435
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus
American Diabetes Association (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-s062 · Cited by 1,817
Electrochemical Glucose Sensors and Their Applications in Diabetes Management
Heller, A., & Feldman, B. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068069y · Cited by 1,707
A Comprehensive Review of Glucose Biosensors Based on Nanostructured Metal-Oxides
Rahman, M. M., Ahammad, A. J. S., Jin, J.-H., Ahn, S. J., & Lee, J.-J. (2010) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s100504855 · Cited by 762
Self-citationGlucose sensors: a review of current and emerging technology
Oliver, N. S., Toumazou, C., Cass, A. E. G., & Johnston, D. G. (2009) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02642.x · Cited by 584
Tura, A., Maran, A., & Pacini, G. (2007) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2006.10.027 · Cited by 283
Review of Non-Invasive Glucose Sensing Techniques: Optical, Electrical and Breath Acetone
Shokrekhodaei, M., & Quinones, S. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20051251 · Cited by 221
Tear glucose levels in normal people and in diabetic patients.
Sen, D. K., & Sarin, G. S. (1980) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.64.9.693 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Adeel, M., Asif, K., Rahman, M. M., Daniele, S., Canzonieri, V., & Rizzolio, F.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-09-23
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 52
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W3202854099
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glucose Detection Devices and Methods Based on Metal–Organic Frameworks and Related Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.202106023
- The paper
- Adeel, M., Asif, K., Rahman, M. M., Daniele, S., Canzonieri, V., & Rizzolio, F. (2021). Glucose Detection Devices and Methods Based on Metal–Organic Frameworks and Related Materials. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.