Cited by 195

Microfluidic Organ‐on‐a‐Chip Technology for Advancement of Drug Development and Toxicology

Caplin, Jeremy D., Granados, Norma G., James, Myra R., Montazami, Reza, Hashemi, Nastaran·2015·Advanced Healthcare Materials

Abstract

In recent years, the exploitation of phenomena surrounding microfluidics has seen an increase in popularity, as researchers have found a way to use their unique properties to create superior design alternatives. One such application is representing the properties and functions of different organs on a microscale chip for the purpose of drug testing or tissue engineering. With the introduction of “organ‐on‐a‐chip” systems, researchers have proposed various methods on various organ‐on‐a‐chip systems to mimic their in vivo counterparts. In this article, a systematic approach is taken to review current technologies pertaining to organ‐on‐a‐chip systems. Design processes with attention to the particular instruments, cells, and materials used are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adhm.201500040

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caplin, J. D., Granados, N. G., James, M. R., Montazami, R., & Hashemi, N.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Iowa State University Ames IA 50011 USA
Venue
Advanced Healthcare Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-26
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
1426-1450
ISSN
  • 2192-2640
  • 2192-2659
Cited by
195
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review