The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing Metal‐Oxide Nanomaterials for Human Safety
Abstract
Nanomaterials can display distinct biological effects compared with bulk materials of the same chemical composition. The physico‐chemical characterization of nanomaterials and their interaction with biological media are essential for reliable studies and are reviewed here with a focus on widely used metal oxide and carbon nanomaterials. Available rat inhalation and cell culture studies compared to original results suggest that hazard potential is not determined by a single physico‐chemical property but instead depends on a combination of material properties. Reactive oxygen species generation, fiber shape, size, solubility and crystalline phase are known indicators of nanomaterials biological impact. According to these properties the summarized hazard potential decreases in the order multi‐walled carbon nanotubes >> CeO 2, ZnO > TiO 2 > functionalized SiO 2 > SiO 2, ZrO 2, carbon black. Enhanced understanding of biophysical properties and cellular effects results in improved testing strategies and enables the selection and production of safe materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays
Wörle-Knirsch, J. M., Pulskamp, K., & Krug, H. F. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl060177c · Cited by 994
Limbach, L. K., Li, Y., Grass, R. N., Brunner, T. J., Hintermann, M. A., Muller, M., Gunther, D., & Stark, W. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051043o · Cited by 779
Hempel, S. L., Buettner, G. R., O’Malley, Y. Q., Wessels, D. A., & Flaherty, D. M. (1999) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00061-1 · Cited by 740
Bermudez, E., Mangum, J. B., Wong, B. A., Asgharian, B., Hext, P. M., Warheit, D. B., & Everitt, J. I. (2004) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfh019 · Cited by 652
Muller, J., Huaux, F., Fonseca, A., Nagy, J. B., Moreau, N., Delos, M., Raymundo-Piñero, E., Béguin, F., Kirsch-Volders, M., Fenoglio, I., et al. (2008) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx800101p · Cited by 261
Cited by
Maiorano, G., Sabella, S., Sorce, B., Brunetti, V., Malvindi, M. A., Cingolani, R., & Pompa, P. P. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn101557e · Cited by 573
Nanotoxicology: An Interdisciplinary Challenge
Krug, H. F., & Wick, P. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201001037 · Cited by 556
Nel, A. E., Nasser, E., Godwin, H., Avery, D., Bahadori, T., Bergeson, L., Beryt, E., Bonner, J. C., Boverhof, D., Carter, J., et al. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4037927 · Cited by 108
Self-citationBiokinetics and effects of barium sulfate nanoparticles
Konduru, N., Keller, J., Ma-Hock, L., Gröters, S., Landsiedel, R., Donaghey, T. C., Brain, J. D., Wohlleben, W., & Molina, R. M. (2014) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-014-0055-3 · Cited by 84
Self-citationYang, F., Zhang, M., He, W., Chen, P., Cai, X., Yang, L., Gu, N., & Wu, J. (2011) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201002185 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Landsiedel, R., Ma‐Hock, L., Kroll, A., Hahn, D., Schnekenburger, J., Wiench, K., & Wohlleben, W.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-25
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2601-2627
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2082954814
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 17.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing Metal‐Oxide Nanomaterials for Human Safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.200902658
- The paper
- Landsiedel, R., Ma‐Hock, L., Kroll, A., Hahn, D., Schnekenburger, J., Wiench, K., & Wohlleben, W. (2010). Testing Metal‐Oxide Nanomaterials for Human Safety. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200902658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
