Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Light‐Triggered In Situ Gelation to Enable Robust Photodynamic‐Immunotherapy by Repeated Stimulations

Meng, Zhouqi, Zhou, Xuanfang, Xu, Jun, Han, Xiao, Dong, Ziliang, Wang, Hairong, Zhang, Yaojia, She, Jialin, Xu, Ligeng, Wang, Chao, Liu, Zhuang·2019·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has shown the potential of triggering systemic antitumor immune responses. However, while the oxygen‐deficient hypoxic tumor microenvironment is a factor that limits the PDT efficacy, the immune responses after conventional PDT usually are not strong enough to eliminate metastatic tumors. Herein, a light‐triggered in situ gelation system containing photosensitizer‐modified catalase together with poly(ethylene glycol) double acrylate (PEGDA) as the polymeric matrix is designed. Immune adjuvant nanoparticles are further introduced into this system to trigger robust antitumor immune responses after PDT. Following local injection of the mixed precursor solution into tumors and the subsequent light exposure, polymerization of PEGDA can be initiated to induce in situ gelation. Such hybrid hydrogel with long‐term tumor retention of various agents and the ability to enable persistent tumor hypoxia relief can enable multiple rounds of PDT, which results in significantly enhanced immune responses by multiround stimulation. Further combination of such gel‐based multiround PDT with anticytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen‐4 checkpoint blockade offers not only the abscopal effect to inhibit growth of distant tumors but also effective long‐term immune memory protection from rechallenged tumors. Therefore, such a light‐triggered in situ gelation system by a single‐dose injection can enable greatly enhanced photoimmunotherapy by means of repeated stimulations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201900927

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Meng, Z., Zhou, X., Xu, J., Han, X., Dong, Z., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., She, J., Xu, L., Wang, C., & Liu, Z.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-22
Volume
31
Issue
24
Pages
e1900927-e1900927
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2942172826
Cited by
362
References
7
FWCI
37.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light‐Triggered In Situ Gelation to Enable Robust Photodynamic‐Immunotherapy by Repeated Stimulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201900927
The paper
Meng, Z., Zhou, X., Xu, J., Han, X., Dong, Z., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., She, J., Xu, L., Wang, C., & Liu, Z. (2019). Light‐Triggered In Situ Gelation to Enable Robust Photodynamic‐Immunotherapy by Repeated Stimulations. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201900927

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.