Cited by 96Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices3D IC and TSV technologies

Self‐Rectifying Memristors for Three‐Dimensional In‐Memory Computing

Ren, Sheng‐Guang, Dong, A‐Wei, Yang, Ling, Xue, Yi‐Bai, Li, Jian‐Cong, Yu, Yin‐Jie, Zhou, Hou‐Ji, Zuo, Wen‐Bin +3 more·2024·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Costly data movement in terms of time and energy in traditional von Neumann systems is exacerbated by emerging information technologies related to artificial intelligence. In‐memory computing (IMC) architecture aims to address this problem. Although the IMC hardware prototype represented by a memristor is developed rapidly and performs well, the sneak path issue is a critical and unavoidable challenge prevalent in large‐scale and high‐density crossbar arrays, particularly in three‐dimensional (3D) integration. As a perfect solution to the sneak‐path issue, a self‐rectifying memristor (SRM) is proposed for 3D integration because of its superior integration density. To date, SRMs have performed well in terms of power consumption (aJ level) and scalability (>10 2 Mbit). Moreover, SRM‐configured 3D integration is considered an ideal hardware platform for 3D IMC. This review focuses on the progress in SRMs and their applications in 3D memory, IMC, neuromorphic computing, and hardware security. The advantages, disadvantages, and optimization strategies of SRMs in diverse application scenarios are illustrated. Challenges posed by physical mechanisms, fabrication processes, and peripheral circuits, as well as potential solutions at the device and system levels, are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.202307218

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ren, S., Dong, A., Yang, L., Xue, Y., Li, J., Yu, Y., Zhou, H., Zuo, W., Li, Y., Cheng, W., & Miao, X.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • School of Integrated Circuits Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Memories Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430074 China
Corresponding author
Li, Yi
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-11-27
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
e2307218-e2307218
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W4388774421
Cited by
96
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 18
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (92064012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › 3D IC and TSV technologies
Keywords
self-rectifying memristors, in-memory computing, 3D integration, sneak paths, crossbar arrays, neuromorphic computing, hardware security, 3D memory, energy-efficient computing, device physics, peripheral circuits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review