Cited by 61Machine Learning in Materials ScienceOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis

Design and Assembly of Virtual Homogeneous Catalyst Libraries –Towards in silico Catalyst Optimisation

Hageman, Jos A., Westerhuis, Johan A., Frühauf, Hans‐Werner, Rothenberg, Gadi·2006·Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis

Abstract

An alternative top‐down concept for searching for homogeneous catalysts is introduced. In this approach, three multi‐dimensional spaces are considered. These represent the catalysts, the descriptor values (e.g., cone angle, lipophilicity indices), and the figures of merit (e.g., turnover frequency, enantiomeric excess, or product selectivity), respectively. By generating and connecting these spaces, it is possible to screen virtual catalyst libraries and indicate regions in the catalyst space where good catalysts are likely to be found. The generation of the catalyst space from simple building blocks is presented and the application of this approach is demonstrated for two cases: predicting the bite angle in a library of 600 ligand‐Rh complexes, and predicting the linear : branched aldehyde product ratio that these 600 catalysts would give in the hydroformylation of 1‐octene. In the latter case, the model is first trained on a set of 39 octene hydroformylation reactions. The limitations and applications of this concept are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adsc.200505299

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although descriptors and representations have evolved with the increasing use of more sophisticated ML models in recent years, demonstrations in the early 2000s bear striking similarity to many modern applications.

    “Although descriptors and representations have evolved with the increasing use of more sophisticated ML models in recent years, demonstrations in the early 2000s (5-8, 42) bear striking similarity to many modern applications (32,43,(72)(73)(74).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hageman, J. A., Westerhuis, J. A., Frühauf, H., & Rothenberg, G.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Rothenberg, Gadi
Venue
Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02
Volume
348
Issue
3
Pages
361-369
ISSN
  • 1615-4150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-4169
OpenAlex
W2140942564
Cited by
61
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Keywords
cone angle, turnover frequency, enantiomeric excess, product selectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review