Cited by 199Machine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Predicting electronic structure properties of transition metal complexes with neural networks

Open access
Janet, Jon Paul, Kulik, Heather J.·2017·Chemical Science

Abstract

Our neural network predicts spin-state ordering of transition metal complexes to near-chemical accuracy with respect to DFT reference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7sc01247k

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Norskov J. K. Bligaard T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2013 52 776 777 23212991
  2. Mills K., Spanner M. and Tamblyn I., Deep Learning and the Schrödinger Equation, arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.01361, 2017. · arXiv
  3. Létard J.-F., Guionneau P. and Goux-Capes L., Towards Spin Crossover Applications, in Spin Crossover in Transition Metal Compounds III, Springer, 2004, pp. 221–249.
  4. Saunders V. R. Hillier I. H. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1973 7 699 705
  5. Montavon G., Hansen K., Fazli S. and Rupp M., in Learning Invariant Representations of Molecules for Atomization Energy Prediction, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, ed. F. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou and K. Q. Weinberger, Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 440–448.
  6. Bengio Y., Practical Recommendations for Gradient-Based Training of Deep Architectures, in Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, ed. G. B. Orr, K. R. Muller and M. Gregoire, Springer, 2012, pp. 437–478.
  7. LeCun Y. Bottou L. Bengio Y. Haffner P. Proc. IEEE 1998 86 2278 2323
  8. Niu F., Recht B., Re C. and Wright S. J., Hogwild!: A Lock-Free Approach to Parallelizing Stochastic Gradient Descent, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2011, p. 21.
  9. Breiman L., Friedman J., Olshen R. A. and Stone C., Classification and Regression Trees, Chapman and Hall, CRC, 1984, vol. 5, pp. 95–96.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janet, J. P., & Kulik, H. J.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kulik, Heather J.
Venue
Chemical Science
Published
2017
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
5137-5152
ISSN
  • 2041-6520 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-6539
OpenAlex
W2598115655
Cited by
199
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 7
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Chemical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (ECCS-1449291)
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund (Career Award at the Scientific Interface)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
transition metal complexes, electronic structure prediction, artificial neural networks, uncertainty quantification, transferability, support vector regression, kernel ridge regression, compound screening, structure generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review