The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: the case of South Carolina
Abstract
A contingent valuation framework is used to evaluate South Carolina consumers' willingness to pay for the “locally grown” characteristic (defined here as South Carolina grown) in produce and animal products and to identify the sociodemographic characteristics affecting consumer preferences for this characteristic. Findings show that South Carolina consumers are willing to pay an average premium of 27% for local produce and 23% for local animal products. Premiums for local products are influenced by age, gender, and income as well as by perceived product quality, a desire to support the local economy, patronage of farmers markets, and consumer ties to agriculture. [JEL Categories: D12, Q13]. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait, J. D., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 4,595
Cameron, T. A. (1988) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/0095-0696(88)90008-3 · Cited by 781
Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-Ended" Contingent Valuation Surveys
Cameron, T. A., & James, M. D. (1987) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1927234 · Cited by 616
Decomposing Local: A Conjoint Analysis of Locally Produced Foods
Darby, K., Batte, M. T., Ernst, S., & Roe, B. (2008) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01111.x · Cited by 595
Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness‐to‐Pay for Golden Rice
Lusk, J. L. (2003) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-8276.00492 · Cited by 592
Loureiro, M. L., & Hine, S. (2002) · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics · doi:10.1017/s1074070800009251 · Cited by 513
Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Eco‐labeled Apples?
LOUREIRO, M. L., MCCLUSKEY, J. J., & MITTELHAMMER, R. C. (2002) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2002.tb00430.x · Cited by 388
Consumers' preferences for locally produced food: A study in southeast Missouri
Brown, C. (2003) · American Journal of Alternative Agriculture · doi:10.1079/ajaa200353 · Cited by 362
Willingness-to-Pay Estimates and Their Relevance to Agribusiness Decision Making
Lusk, J. L., & Hudson, D. (2004) · Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00168.x · Cited by 330
Farmers' Markets: Consumer Trends, Preferences, and Characteristics
Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., & ADELAJA, A. (2002) · Journal of Extension · doi:10.66752/1077-5315.5103 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: A review
Feldmann, C., & Hamm, U. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.014 · Cited by 1,011
Journal of Food Distribution Research
Fdrs, & FDRS (2019) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.300079 · Cited by 771
Onozaka, Y., & McFadden, D. T. (2011) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aar005 · Cited by 405
Meta-analysis of consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable food products
Li, S., & Kallas, Z. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105239 · Cited by 359
Local food systems: Reviewing two decades of research
Enthoven, L., & Van den Broeck, G. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103226 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpio, C. E., & Isengildina‐Massa, O.
- Venue
- Agribusiness
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 412-426
- ISSN
- 0742-4477 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6297
- OpenAlex
- W2170079847
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 19.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: the case of South Carolina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/agr.20210
- The paper
- Carpio, C. E., & Isengildina‐Massa, O. (2009). Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: the case of South Carolina. Agribusiness. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.