The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preclinical and clinical biomarker studies of CT1812: A novel approach to Alzheimer's disease modification
Abstract
Introduction: Amyloid beta (Aβ) oligomers are one of the most toxic structural forms of the Aβ protein and are hypothesized to cause synaptotoxicity and memory failure as they build up in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients’ brain tissue. We previously demonstrated that antagonists of the sigma‐2 receptor complex effectively block Aβ oligomer toxicity. CT1812 is an orally bioavailable, brain penetrant small molecule antagonist of the sigma‐2 receptor complex that appears safe and well tolerated in healthy elderly volunteers. We tested CT1812's effect on Aβ oligomer pathobiology in preclinical AD models and evaluated CT1812's impact on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein biomarkers in mild to moderate AD patients in a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02907567). Methods: Experiments were performed to measure the impact of CT1812 versus vehicle on Aβ oligomer binding to synapses in vitro, to human AD patient post mortem brain tissue ex vivo, and in living APP Swe /PS1dE9 transgenic mice in vivo. Additional experiments were performed to measure the impact of CT1812 versus vehicle on Aβ oligomer‐induced deficits in membrane trafficking rate, synapse number, and protein expression in mature hippocampal/cortical neurons in vitro. The impact of CT1812 on cognitive function was measured in transgenic Thy1 huAPP Swe/Lnd+ and wild‐type littermates. A multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled parallel group trial was performed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and impact on protein biomarker expression of CT1812 or placebo given once daily for 28 days to AD patients (Mini‐Mental State Examination 18–26). CSF protein expression was measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry or enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in samples drawn prior to dosing (Day 0) and at end of dosing (Day 28) and compared within each patient and between pooled treated versus placebo‐treated dosing groups. Results: CT1812 significantly and dose‐dependently displaced Aβ oligomers bound to synaptic receptors in three independent preclinical models of AD, facilitated oligomer clearance into the CSF, increased synaptic number and protein expression in neurons, and improved cognitive performance in transgenic mice. CT1812 significantly increased CSF concentrations of Aβ oligomers in AD patient CSF, reduced concentrations of synaptic proteins and phosphorylated tau fragments, and reversed expression of many AD‐related proteins dysregulated in CSF. Discussion: These preclinical studies demonstrate the novel disease‐modifying mechanism of action of CT1812 against AD and Aβ oligomers. The clinical results are consistent with preclinical data and provide evidence of target engagement and impact on fundamental disease‐related signaling pathways in AD patients, supporting further development of CT1812.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior exploratory CSF analyses supported an impact of zervimesine on AD pathophysiology including amyloid biology, synaptic function, inflammation and lipoprotein-related biological processes.
“These exploratory analyses supported an impact of zervimesine on AD pathophysiology [1, 36, 39, 40] including amyloid biology, synaptic function [4–6], inflammation and lipoprotein-related biological processes [5, 6, 41]”
Deficits in cognitive performance seen in transgenic mice with Aβ accumulation are normalized following zervimesine treatment.
“deficits in cognitive performance seen in transgenic mice with Aβ accumulation are normalized following zervimesine treatment [1].”
Treatment of neurons with zervimesine restores the functional and synaptic deficits incurred by Aβ oligomers, including restoration of membrane trafficking and prevention of synapse loss.
“Treatment of neurons with zervimesine restores the functional and synaptic deficits incurred by Aβ oligomers, including the restoration of membrane trafficking, and the prevention of synapse loss [1].”
Zervimesine can displace toxic Aβ oligomers from binding to neuronal synapses.
“preclinical studies have shown that zervimesine can displace toxic Aβ oligomers from binding to neuronal synapses.”
Reduction in NfL levels in zervimesine-treated participants compared to placebo is consistent with preclinical studies demonstrating zervimesine rescue of synaptic loss and neuronal function in vitro and preservation of cognitive function in an in vivo AD model.
“Reduction in NfL levels in zervimesine-treated participants compared to placebo is consistent with preclinical studies demonstrating zervimesine rescue of synaptic loss and neuronal function in vitro and preservation of cognitive function in an in vivo AD model [1].”
After a single dose of zervimesine in mice, levels of Aβ oligomers were increased in minutes to hours.
“after a single dose of zervimesine, levels of Aβ oligomers were increased in minutes to hours [1].”
The reduction of Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in zervimesine-treated participants compared to placebo may point to downstream effects of zervimesine on Aβ dynamics.
“Thus, the reduction of Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in zervimesine-treated participants compared to placebo may point to downstream effects of zervimesine on Aβ dynamics”
Several S2R modulators (CT0093, CT0109, CT1344, CT1346, and CT1812) rescued memory and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer's mouse model.
“Independently, several S2R modulators (CT0093, CT0109, CT1344, CT1346, and CT1812) rescued memory and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer’s mouse model [2,64] (Figure 5).”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
Synaptic loss is not necessarily permanent and synapses can be regained or formed again once amyloid-β oligomers are removed.
“Synaptic loss, however, is not necessarily permanent and synapses can be regained or formed again once amyloid-β oligomers are removed [64].”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
S2R modulators restore cognitive deficits in Alzheimer transgenic mice.
“Lastly, to be discussed in greater detail below, S2R modulators restore cognitive deficits in Alzheimer transgenic mice [2,64].”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
S2R modulators have been shown to rescue learning and memory in Alzheimer's mouse models.
“S2R modulators have been shown to rescue learning and memory in Alzheimer’s mouse models [2,64].”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
In primary rat neurons, S2R modulators CT0093, CT0109, CT1344, CT1346, and CT1812 demonstrate synaptic protection and restoration of neuronal function.
“In primary rat neurons, S2R modulators by CT0093, CT0109, CT1344, CT1346, and CT1812 demonstrate synaptic protection (Figure 4) and restoration of neuronal function [2,64].”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
The biophysical assessment in postmortem Alzheimer's disease brain corroborates in vitro and in vivo evidence of displacement of amyloid-β oligomers, representing a potential mechanism of action underlying protection against amyloid-β oligomer-induced synaptic degradation observed with S2R modulators.
“This interaction assessed biophysically, in the postmortem brain from individuals with Alzheimer’s disease, corroborates in vitro and in vivo evidence of displacement of amyloid-β oligomers [64], representing a potential mechanism of action underlying the protection against amyloid-β oligomer-induced synaptic degradation [153,154,155,156,157] observed with S2R modulators [64].”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
In APPswe/PS1dE9 transgenic mice, significant cognitive deficits in fear recall and Morris water maze were prevented with CT1812 treatment.
“In both assays, the transgenic mice exhibited significant cognitive deficits that were prevented with CT1812 treatment (Figure 5).”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
In preclinical studies, CT1812 slows amyloid-β oligomer-induced loss of synapses and restores synaptic activity.
“In preclinical studies, CT1812 also slows amyloid-β oligomer-induced loss of synapses and restores synaptic activity (Figure 4) [64]”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
Given the ability of S2R modulators to rescue both amyloid-β oligomer and α-synuclein oligomer deficits, there is promise that S2R may be beneficial in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies.
“Given the ability of S2R modulators to rescue both amyloid-β oligomer and α-synuclein oligomer deficits [2,3,4,64], there is promise that S2R may be beneficial in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies.”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
CT1812 selectively prevents and displaces amyloid-β oligomers from binding to neuronal synapses, thereby mitigating downstream toxicity.
“CT1812 selectively prevents and displaces amyloid-β oligomers from binding to neuronal synapses, thereby mitigating downstream toxicity.”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
A previously published model proposes that CT1812 does not compete directly with oligomers at the same site.
“Therefore suggesting that CT1812 does not compete directly with oligomers at the same site [28]”
From Transmembrane protein 97 is a potential synaptic amyloid beta receptor in human Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years
Selkoe, D. J., & Hardy, J. (2016) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201606210 · Cited by 6,164
Common structure of soluble amyloid oligomers implies common mechanism of pathogenesis
Kayed, R., Head, E., Thompson, J. L., McIntire, T. M., Milton, S. C., Cotman, C. W., & Glabe, C. G. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079469 · Cited by 4,064
Shankar, G. M., Li, S., Mehta, T. H., Garcia-Munoz, A., Shepardson, N. E., Smith, I., Brett, F. M., Farrell, M. A., Rowan, M. J., Lemere, C. A., et al. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1782 · Cited by 3,685
Diffusible, nonfibrillar ligands derived from Aβ 1–42 are potent central nervous system neurotoxins
Lambert, M. P., Barlow, A. K., Chromy, B. A., Edwards, C., Freed, R., Liosatos, M., Morgan, T. E., Rozovsky, I., Trommer, B., Viola, K. L., et al. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.11.6448 · Cited by 3,506
Neuropathological alterations in Alzheimer disease
Serrano-Pozo, A., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., & Hyman, B. T. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006189 · Cited by 3,345
A mutation in APP protects against Alzheimer’s disease and age-related cognitive decline
Jonsson, T., Atwal, J. K., Steinberg, S., Snaedal, J., Jonsson, P. V., Bjornsson, S., Stefansson, H., Sulem, P., Gudbjartsson, D., Maloney, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11283 · Cited by 1,738
Shankar, G. M., Bloodgood, B. L., Townsend, M., Walsh, D. M., Selkoe, D. J., & Sabatini, B. L. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4970-06.2007 · Cited by 1,592
Regulation of NMDA receptor trafficking by amyloid-β
Snyder, E. M., Nong, Y., Almeida, C. G., Paul, S., Moran, T., Choi, E. Y., Nairn, A. C., Salter, M. W., Lombroso, P. J., Gouras, G. K., et al. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1503 · Cited by 1,561
Neuronal loss correlates with but exceeds neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease
Gómez‐Isla, T., Hollister, R., West, H., Mui, S., Growdon, J. H., Petersen, R. C., Parisi, J. E., & Hyman, B. T. (1997) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410410106 · Cited by 1,489
Lacor, P. N., Buniel, M. C., Furlow, P. W., Sanz Clemente, A., Velasco, P. T., Wood, M., Viola, K. L., & Klein, W. L. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3501-06.2007 · Cited by 1,188
Picomolar Amyloid-β Positively Modulates Synaptic Plasticity and Memory in Hippocampus
Puzzo, D., Privitera, L., Leznik, E., Fà, M., Staniszewski, A., Palmeri, A., & Arancio, O. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2692-08.2008 · Cited by 740
Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2018
Cummings, J., Lee, G., Ritter, A., & Zhong, K. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2018.03.009 · Cited by 697
Amyloid β oligomers in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis, treatment, and diagnosis
Viola, K. L., & Klein, W. L. (2015) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1386-3 · Cited by 628
Amyloid β protein immunotherapy neutralizes Aβ oligomers that disrupt synaptic plasticity in vivo
Klyubin, I., Walsh, D. M., Lemere, C. A., Cullen, W. K., Shankar, G. M., Betts, V., Spooner, E. T., Jiang, L., Anwyl, R., Selkoe, D. J., et al. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1234 · Cited by 489
The importance of tau phosphorylation for neurodegenerative diseases
Noble, W., Hanger, D. P., Miller, C. C. J., & Lovestone, S. (2013) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2013.00083 · Cited by 475
Higginbotham, L., Ping, L., Dammer, E. B., Duong, D. M., Zhou, M., Gearing, M., Hurst, C., Glass, J. D., Factor, S. A., Johnson, E. C. B., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz9360 · Cited by 367
Vaccination with soluble Aβ oligomers generates toxicity‐neutralizing antibodies
Lambert, M. P., Viola, K. L., Chromy, B. A., Chang, L., Morgan, T. E., Yu, J., Venton, D. L., Krafft, G. A., Finch, C. E., & Klein, W. L. (2001) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00592.x · Cited by 349
Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β
Koffie, R. M., Hashimoto, T., Tai, H.-C., Kay, K. R., Serrano-Pozo, A., Joyner, D., Hou, S., Kopeikina, K. J., Frosch, M. P., Lee, V. M., et al. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws127 · Cited by 327
Self-citationKlyubin, I., Betts, V., Welzel, A. T., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Wallin, A., Lemere, C. A., Cullen, W. K., Peng, Y., Wisniewski, T., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5161-07.2008 · Cited by 321
Self-citationZetterberg, H. (2012) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2012.90 · Cited by 234
Self-citationThe pre-synaptic vesicle protein synaptotagmin is a novel biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease
Öhrfelt, A., Brinkmalm, A., Dumurgier, J., Brinkmalm, G., Hansson, O., Zetterberg, H., Bouaziz-Amar, E., Hugon, J., Paquet, C., & Blennow, K. (2016) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-016-0208-8 · Cited by 184
Self-citationIzzo, N. J., Staniszewski, A., To, L., Fa, M., Teich, A. F., Saeed, F., Wostein, H., Walko, T., Vaswani, A., Wardius, M., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 · Cited by 180
Self-citationBarthélemy, N. R., Mallipeddi, N., Moiseyev, P., Sato, C., & Bateman, R. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00121 · Cited by 152
Riad, A., Zeng, C., Weng, C.-C., Winters, H., Xu, K., Makvandi, M., Metz, T., Carlin, S., & Mach, R. H. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35430-3 · Cited by 147
Riad, A., Lengyel-Zhand, Z., Zeng, C., Weng, C.-C., Lee, V. M.-Y., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Mach, R. H. (2020) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-020-01988-1 · Cited by 81
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 70
- 10.1016/j.trci.2019.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Hardy J, 2017, The Discovery of Alzheimer causing Mutations in the APP Gene and the Formulation of the “Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis, FEBS J, 38, 42
- 10.1016/j.conb.2020.02.003 · DOI
- Limegrover CS, 2020, Alzheimer's protection effect of A673T mutation may be driven by lower Aβ oligomer binding affinity, J Neurochem
- 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2174/156720507783018235 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1242077 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith LM, 2019, Systematic and standardized comparison of reported amyloid‐β receptors for sufficiency, affinity, and Alzheimer's disease relevance, J Biol Chem
- 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.07.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.02.006 · DOI
- 10.1096/fj.10-156661 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1633-03.2004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/416535a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4391-04.2005 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5291-04.2005 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1372 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0111899 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.trci.2018.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fphar.2019.01141 · DOI
- 10.1517/17425255.2012.658367 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.07.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1803384115 · DOI
- 10.1210/en.2011-2177 · DOI
- IzzoNJ Colom‐CadenaM RiadAA et al.Proceedings from the Fourth International Symposium on sigma‐2 Receptors: Role in Health and Disease. ENeuro2020:ENEURO.0317‐20.2020.https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0317-20.2020. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1084/jem.20151428 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.10.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0811698106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/brb3.41 · DOI
- 10.1111/jnc.13917 · DOI · Paper page
- Zetterberg H, 2015, Neurogranin levels in cerebrospinal fluid: a new addition to the Alzheimer disease dagnostic toolbox, JAMA Neurol, 72, 1, 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2075 · DOI
- Kvartsberg H, 2018, The intact postsynaptic protein neurogranin is reduced in brain tissue from patients with familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease, Acta Neuropathol
- Willemse EAJ, 2018, Neurogranin as cerebrospinal fluid biomarker for Alzheimer sisease: an assay comparison study, Clin Chem, 10.1373/clinchem.2017.283028 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awv267 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/mcp.RA118.001290 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01124-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M115.641902 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tips.2013.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M305135200 · DOI
- 10.3233/JAD-160633 · DOI · Paper page
- Dashinimaev EB, 2017, Neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells of patients with Down syndrome reproduce early stages of Alzheimer's disease type pathology in vitro, J Alzheimer's Dis, 56, 1
- 10.3233/JAD-179928 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.02.035 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg4017 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1698-16.2016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0086 · DOI
- Blennow K, 2018, Biomarkers for Alzheimer disease ‐ current status and prospects for the future, J Intern Med, 0
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002423 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.03.016 · DOI
- Llorens‐Martín M, 2014, GSK‐3β, a pivotal kinase in Alzheimer disease, Front Mol Neurosci, 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00046 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/pr400008f · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aah6205 · DOI · Paper page
- Jarosz‐Griffiths HH, 2015, Amyloid‐β receptors: the good, the bad and the prion protein, J Biol Chem
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.035 · DOI · Paper page
- Ganapathy ME, 1999, Molecular and ligand‐binding characterization of the sigma‐receptor in the Jurkat human T lymphocyte cell line, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 289, 251, 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)38131-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00050-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13266 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.041 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2089 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0165-0270(79)90039-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00401-018-1851-x · DOI
- 10.1186/1750-1326-9-53 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1530/ERC-15-0502 · DOI
- 10.1002/rcm.7777 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41591-020-0815-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Rankin CA, 2007, Tau phosphorylation by GSK‐3ß promotes tangle‐like filament morphology, Mol Neurodegener, 2, 1, 10.1186/1750-1326-2-12 · DOI
- Salcedo‐Tello P, 2011, GSK3 function in the brain during development, neuronal plasticity, and neurodegeneration, Int J Alzheimers Dis, 2011, 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amyloid β-based therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: Challenges, successes and future
Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Li, R., Sterling, K., & Song, W. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01484-7 · Cited by 988
Jeremic, D., Jiménez-Díaz, L., & Navarro-López, J. D. (2021) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101496 · Cited by 306
Lizama, B. N., Kahle, J., Catalano, S. M., Caggiano, A. O., Grundman, M., & Hamby, M. E. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24076251 · Cited by 54
Self-citationMorató, X., Pytel, V., Jofresa, S., Ruiz, A., & Boada, M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23169305 · Cited by 53
Transmembrane protein 97 is a potential synaptic amyloid beta receptor in human Alzheimer’s disease
Colom-Cadena, M., Toombs, J., Simzer, E., Holt, K., McGeachan, R., Tulloch, J., Jackson, R. J., Catterson, J. H., Spires-Jones, M. P., Rose, J., et al. (2024) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-023-02679-6 · Cited by 44
Self-citationDi Caro, V., Cho, E., Thiel, J., Lizama, B. N., Koel-Simmelink, M. J. A., Pandey, K., Duong, D., Seyfried, N. T., Grundman, M., Teunissen, C. E., et al. (2026) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-026-02025-4 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Izzo, N. J., Yuede, C. M., LaBarbera, K. M., Limegrover, C. S., Rehak, C., Yurko, R., Waybright, L., Look, G., Rishton, G., Safferstein, H., Hamby, M. E., Williams, C., Sadlek, K., Edwards, H. M., Davis, C. S., Grundman, M., Schneider, L. S., DeKosky, S. T., Chelsky, D., Pike, I., Henstridge, C., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., LeVine, H., Spires‐Jones, T. L., Cirrito, J. R., & Catalano, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Cognition Therapeutics Inc. Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
- Washington University St. Louis Missouri USA
- CSD Biostatistics Inc. Oro Valley Arizona USA
- Global R&D Partners San Diego California USA
- Keck School of Medicine of USC Los Angeles California USA
- McKnight Brain Institute University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
- Caprion Biosciences Montreal Quebec Canada
- Proteome Sciences London UK
- University of Dundee School of Medicine Dundee UK
- University of Gothenburg Mölndal Sweden
- Sanders‐Brown Center on Aging University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA
- The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-02-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1365-1382
- ISSN
- 1552-5260
- 1552-5279
- PMC
- PMC8349378
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 25
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review