Cited by 95

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preclinical and clinical biomarker studies of CT1812: A novel approach to Alzheimer's disease modification

Izzo, Nicholas J., Yuede, Carla M., LaBarbera, Kelsie M., Limegrover, Colleen S., Rehak, Courtney, Yurko, Raymond, Waybright, Lora, Look, Gary, Rishton, Gilbert, Safferstein, Hank, Hamby, Mary E., Williams, Claire, Sadlek, Kelsey, Edwards, Hannah M., Davis, Charles S., Grundman, Michael, Schneider, Lon S., DeKosky, Steven T., Chelsky, Daniel, Pike, Ian, Henstridge, Christopher, Blennow, Kaj, Zetterberg, Henrik, LeVine, Harry, Spires‐Jones, Tara L., Cirrito, John R., Catalano, Susan M.·2021·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Introduction: Amyloid beta (Aβ) oligomers are one of the most toxic structural forms of the Aβ protein and are hypothesized to cause synaptotoxicity and memory failure as they build up in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients’ brain tissue. We previously demonstrated that antagonists of the sigma‐2 receptor complex effectively block Aβ oligomer toxicity. CT1812 is an orally bioavailable, brain penetrant small molecule antagonist of the sigma‐2 receptor complex that appears safe and well tolerated in healthy elderly volunteers. We tested CT1812's effect on Aβ oligomer pathobiology in preclinical AD models and evaluated CT1812's impact on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein biomarkers in mild to moderate AD patients in a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02907567). Methods: Experiments were performed to measure the impact of CT1812 versus vehicle on Aβ oligomer binding to synapses in vitro, to human AD patient post mortem brain tissue ex vivo, and in living APP Swe /PS1dE9 transgenic mice in vivo. Additional experiments were performed to measure the impact of CT1812 versus vehicle on Aβ oligomer‐induced deficits in membrane trafficking rate, synapse number, and protein expression in mature hippocampal/cortical neurons in vitro. The impact of CT1812 on cognitive function was measured in transgenic Thy1 huAPP Swe/Lnd+ and wild‐type littermates. A multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled parallel group trial was performed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and impact on protein biomarker expression of CT1812 or placebo given once daily for 28 days to AD patients (Mini‐Mental State Examination 18–26). CSF protein expression was measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry or enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in samples drawn prior to dosing (Day 0) and at end of dosing (Day 28) and compared within each patient and between pooled treated versus placebo‐treated dosing groups. Results: CT1812 significantly and dose‐dependently displaced Aβ oligomers bound to synaptic receptors in three independent preclinical models of AD, facilitated oligomer clearance into the CSF, increased synaptic number and protein expression in neurons, and improved cognitive performance in transgenic mice. CT1812 significantly increased CSF concentrations of Aβ oligomers in AD patient CSF, reduced concentrations of synaptic proteins and phosphorylated tau fragments, and reversed expression of many AD‐related proteins dysregulated in CSF. Discussion: These preclinical studies demonstrate the novel disease‐modifying mechanism of action of CT1812 against AD and Aβ oligomers. The clinical results are consistent with preclinical data and provide evidence of target engagement and impact on fundamental disease‐related signaling pathways in AD patients, supporting further development of CT1812.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.12302

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. 10.1016/j.trci.2019.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hardy J, 2017, The Discovery of Alzheimer causing Mutations in the APP Gene and the Formulation of the “Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis, FEBS J, 38, 42
  3. 10.1016/j.conb.2020.02.003 · DOI
  4. Limegrover CS, 2020, Alzheimer's protection effect of A673T mutation may be driven by lower Aβ oligomer binding affinity, J Neurochem
  5. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2174/156720507783018235 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.1242077 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Smith LM, 2019, Systematic and standardized comparison of reported amyloid‐β receptors for sufficiency, affinity, and Alzheimer's disease relevance, J Biol Chem
  9. 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.07.011 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.02.006 · DOI
  11. 10.1096/fj.10-156661 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1633-03.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/416535a · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4391-04.2005 · DOI
  16. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5291-04.2005 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nn1372 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111899 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.trci.2018.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.3389/fphar.2019.01141 · DOI
  21. 10.1517/17425255.2012.658367 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.02.002 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.07.004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1803384115 · DOI
  25. 10.1210/en.2011-2177 · DOI
  26. IzzoNJ Colom‐CadenaM RiadAA et al.Proceedings from the Fourth International Symposium on sigma‐2 Receptors: Role in Health and Disease. ENeuro2020:ENEURO.0317‐20.2020.https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0317-20.2020. · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1084/jem.20151428 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.10.022 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1073/pnas.0811698106 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1002/brb3.41 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/jnc.13917 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Zetterberg H, 2015, Neurogranin levels in cerebrospinal fluid: a new addition to the Alzheimer disease dagnostic toolbox, JAMA Neurol, 72, 1, 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2075 · DOI
  34. Kvartsberg H, 2018, The intact postsynaptic protein neurogranin is reduced in brain tissue from patients with familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease, Acta Neuropathol
  35. Willemse EAJ, 2018, Neurogranin as cerebrospinal fluid biomarker for Alzheimer sisease: an assay comparison study, Clin Chem, 10.1373/clinchem.2017.283028 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/brain/awv267 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1074/mcp.RA118.001290 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01124-1 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1074/jbc.M115.641902 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.tips.2013.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1074/jbc.M305135200 · DOI
  42. 10.3233/JAD-160633 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Dashinimaev EB, 2017, Neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells of patients with Down syndrome reproduce early stages of Alzheimer's disease type pathology in vitro, J Alzheimer's Dis, 56, 1
  44. 10.3233/JAD-179928 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.02.035 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nrg4017 · DOI
  47. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1698-16.2016 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0086 · DOI
  49. Blennow K, 2018, Biomarkers for Alzheimer disease ‐ current status and prospects for the future, J Intern Med, 0
  50. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002423 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.03.016 · DOI
  53. Llorens‐Martín M, 2014, GSK‐3β, a pivotal kinase in Alzheimer disease, Front Mol Neurosci, 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00046 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1021/pr400008f · DOI
  55. 10.1126/science.aah6205 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Jarosz‐Griffiths HH, 2015, Amyloid‐β receptors: the good, the bad and the prion protein, J Biol Chem
  57. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.035 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Ganapathy ME, 1999, Molecular and ligand‐binding characterization of the sigma‐receptor in the Jurkat human T lymphocyte cell line, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 289, 251, 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)38131-5 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00050-5 · DOI
  60. 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13266 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.041 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/0165-0270(79)90039-6 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s00401-018-1851-x · DOI
  65. 10.1186/1750-1326-9-53 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1530/ERC-15-0502 · DOI
  67. 10.1002/rcm.7777 · DOI
  68. 10.1038/s41591-020-0815-6 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Rankin CA, 2007, Tau phosphorylation by GSK‐3ß promotes tangle‐like filament morphology, Mol Neurodegener, 2, 1, 10.1186/1750-1326-2-12 · DOI
  70. Salcedo‐Tello P, 2011, GSK3 function in the brain during development, neuronal plasticity, and neurodegeneration, Int J Alzheimers Dis, 2011, 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Izzo, N. J., Yuede, C. M., LaBarbera, K. M., Limegrover, C. S., Rehak, C., Yurko, R., Waybright, L., Look, G., Rishton, G., Safferstein, H., Hamby, M. E., Williams, C., Sadlek, K., Edwards, H. M., Davis, C. S., Grundman, M., Schneider, L. S., DeKosky, S. T., Chelsky, D., Pike, I., Henstridge, C., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., LeVine, H., Spires‐Jones, T. L., Cirrito, J. R., & Catalano, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Cognition Therapeutics Inc. Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
  • Washington University St. Louis Missouri USA
  • CSD Biostatistics Inc. Oro Valley Arizona USA
  • Global R&D Partners San Diego California USA
  • Keck School of Medicine of USC Los Angeles California USA
  • McKnight Brain Institute University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
  • Caprion Biosciences Montreal Quebec Canada
  • Proteome Sciences London UK
  • University of Dundee School of Medicine Dundee UK
  • University of Gothenburg Mölndal Sweden
  • Sanders‐Brown Center on Aging University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA
  • The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-08
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
1365-1382
ISSN
  • 1552-5260
  • 1552-5279
Cited by
95
References
25
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review