Cited by 120Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Aβ‐peptide length aid apolipoprotein E genotype in Alzheimer's disease

Gearing, Marla, Mori, Hiroshi, Mirra, Suzanne S.·1996·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Apolipoprotein ∈ (ApoE)ε4 allele, a risk factor for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD), is associated with increased amyloid deposition. We examined cerebral cortex in 68 AD cases using antibodies to βbeta;‐amyloid (Aβbeta;) peptides of different length (Aβbeta;1−40 and Aβbeta;l−42) and found that the increased plaque frequency observed with ε4 genotypes may be largely attributed to an increase in Aβbeta;1−40‐positive plaques. Indeed, both the number of Aβbeta;1−40‐positive plaques, as well as the ratio of Aβbeta;I−40/ Aβbeta;1−42‐positive plaques, increased with ε4 dosage. In contrast, the frequency of Aβbeta;1−42‐immunoreactive plaques was similar for ε3/ε3,ε3/ε4 and ε4/ε4 genotypes. ApoE may influence Aβbeta; length by facilitating Aβbeta; 1−40 deposition onto Aβbeta;1−42‐seeded plaques or by modulating the activity of a putative carboxypeptidase that forms Aβbeta;1−40 from Aβbeta;1−42 in situ.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410390320

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased CAA in ε4-positive subjects does not entirely account for the preferential Aβ40 deposition.

    “Although the apparent differential effects on Aβ40 and Aβ42 aggregation by apoE4 might be simply attributed to the increased CAA in apoε4 subjects, careful immunohistochemical analyses of plaques using Aβ40 or Aβ42 specific antibodies suggest that increased CAA in ε4-positive subjects does not entirely account for the preferential Aβ40 deposition (Gearing et al., 1996; Mann et al., 1997).”

    From The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as Gearing et al., 1996

  • Several reports suggest that Aβ40 preferentially aggregates in an apoE4 gene dose-dependent manner in AD subjects.

    “Interestingly, there have been several reports suggesting that Aβ40 preferentially aggregates in an apoE4 gene dose-dependent manner in AD subjects (Gearing et al., 1996; Ishii et al., 1997; Mann et al., 1997).”

    From The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as Gearing et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gearing, M., Mori, H., & Mirra, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Atlanta VA Medical Center (US)
  • Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry (JP)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Mirra, Suzanne S.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-03
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
395-399
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2045471895
Cited by
120
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4, amyloid-beta, Aβ40, amyloid-beta 42, amyloid plaques, cerebral cortex, APOE genotype, carboxypeptidase, amyloid deposition
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Carboxypeptidases, Cerebral Cortex, Genotype, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review