Cited by 104Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Distinct Pools of β-Amyloid in Alzheimer Disease–Affected Brain: A Clinicopathologic Study

Open access
Steinerman, Joshua R., Irizarry, Michael, Scarmeas, Nikolaos, Raju, Susan, Brandt, Jason, Albert, Marilyn, Blacker, Deborah, Hyman, Bradley +1 more·2008·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether beta-amyloid (Abeta) peptides segregated into distinct biochemical compartments would differentially correlate with clinical severity of Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: Clinicopathologic correlation study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients from a longitudinal study of AD and 13 age- and sex-matched controls without a known history of cognitive impairment or dementia were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Temporal and cingulate neocortex were processed using a 4-step extraction, yielding biochemical fractions that are hypothesized to be enriched with proteins from distinct anatomical compartments: TRIS (extracellular soluble), Triton (intracellular soluble), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (membrane associated), and formic acid (extracellular insoluble). Levels of Abeta(40) and Abeta(42) were quantified in each biochemical compartment by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The Abeta(42) level in all biochemical compartments was significantly elevated in patients with AD vs controls (P < .01). The Abeta(40) levels in the TRIS and formic acid fractions were elevated in patients with AD (temporal, P < .01; cingulate, P = .03); however, Triton and SDS Abeta(40) levels were similar in patients with AD and in controls. Functional impairment proximal to death correlated with Triton Abeta(42) (r = 0.48, P = .02) and SDS Abeta(42) (r = 0.41, P = .04) in the temporal cortex. Faster cognitive decline was associated with elevated temporal SDS Abeta(42) levels (P < .001), whereas slower decline was associated with elevated cingulate formic acid Abeta(42) and SDS Abeta(42) levels (P = .02 and P = .01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Intracellular and membrane-associated Abeta, especially Abeta(42) in the temporal neocortex, may be more closely related to AD symptoms than other measured Abeta species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.65.7.906

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study indicated that cognitive decline in AD tracked best with the membranous pool of Aβ42 in brain tissue from human AD; it was concluded that this membrane-associated Aβ42 was cell associated and reflected intraneuronal Aβ42.

    “a recent study indicated that cognitive decline in AD tracked best with the membranous pool of Aβ42 in brain tissue from human AD [180]; it was concluded that this membrane-associated Aβ42 was cell associated and reflected intraneuronal Aβ42.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinerman, J. R., Irizarry, M., Scarmeas, N., Raju, S., Brandt, J., Albert, M., Blacker, D., Hyman, B., & Stern, Y.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
65
Issue
7
Pages
906-12
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002793086
Cited by
104
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag007370-30)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG07370, R01-AG007370, P50 AG05134, P50AG005134)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020004)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta 42, Aβ40, biochemical fractionation, extracellular amyloid, temporal cortex, cingulate cortex, cognitive decline, clinicopathological correlation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review