The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PEGylation and Zwitterionization: Pros and Cons in the Renal Clearance and Tumor Targeting of Near‐IR‐Emitting Gold Nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
Got it PEGged: PEGylation and zwitterionization have distinct effects on the pharmacokinetic and tumor-targeting properties of luminescent gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), although both strategies lead to effective renal clearance. High tumor-targeting efficiency and specificity were obtained with PEGylated AuNPs, whereas rapid tumor detection was more readily achieved with zwitterionic AuNPs. HD=hydrodynamic diameter, GS=glutathione.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles
Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2008) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp800051m · Cited by 3,699
Maeda, H. (2001) · Advances in Enzyme Regulation · doi:10.1016/s0065-2571(00)00013-3 · Cited by 2,495
Longmire, M., Choyke, P. L., & Kobayashi, H. (2008) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.3.5.703 · Cited by 2,149
Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting
Iyer, A. K., Khaled, G., Fang, J., & Maeda, H. (2006) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2006.07.005 · Cited by 1,846
Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials
Dobrovolskaia, M. A., & McNeil, S. E. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.223 · Cited by 1,823
Design considerations for tumour-targeted nanoparticles
Choi, H. S., Liu, W., Liu, F., Nasr, K., Misra, P., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2010) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.314 · Cited by 754
Modulating Pharmacokinetics, Tumor Uptake and Biodistribution by Engineered Nanoparticles
Arvizo, R. R., Miranda, O. R., Moyano, D. F., Walden, C. A., Giri, K., Bhattacharya, R., Robertson, J. D., Rotello, V. M., Reid, J. M., & Mukherjee, P. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024374 · Cited by 403
Cited by
Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours
Wilhelm, S., Tavares, A. J., Dai, Q., Ohta, S., Audet, J., Dvorak, H. F., & Chan, W. C. W. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14 · Cited by 5,218
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Gold Nanomaterials at Work in Biomedicine
Yang, X., Yang, M., Pang, B., Vara, M., & Xia, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00193 · Cited by 1,162
Transport and interactions of nanoparticles in the kidneys
Du, B., Yu, M., & Zheng, J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0038-3 · Cited by 649
Self-citationXu, M., Qi, Y., Liu, G., Song, Y., Jiang, X., & Du, B. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c05853 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Yu, M., Ning, X., Zhou, C., Yang, S., & Zheng, J.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 12572-12576
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2133671258
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PEGylation and Zwitterionization: Pros and Cons in the Renal Clearance and Tumor Targeting of Near‐IR‐Emitting Gold Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201304465
- The paper
- Liu, J., Yu, M., Ning, X., Zhou, C., Yang, S., & Zheng, J. (2013). PEGylation and Zwitterionization: Pros and Cons in the Renal Clearance and Tumor Targeting of Near‐IR‐Emitting Gold Nanoparticles. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201304465
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
