The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Translating Bacterial Detection by DNAzymes into a Litmus Test
Abstract
Microbial pathogens pose serious threats to public health and safety, and results in millions of illnesses and deaths as well as huge economic losses annually. Laborious and expensive pathogen tests often represent a significant hindrance to implementing effective front‐line preventative care, particularly in resource‐limited regions. Thus, there is a significant need to develop low‐cost and easy‐to‐use methods for pathogen detection. Herein, we present a simple and inexpensive litmus test for bacterial detection. The method takes advantage of a bacteria‐specific RNA‐cleaving DNAzyme probe as the molecular recognition element and the ability of urease to hydrolyze urea and elevate the pH value of the test solution. By coupling urease to the DNAzyme on magnetic beads, the detection of bacteria is translated into a pH increase, which can be readily detected using a litmus dye or pH paper. The simplicity, low cost, and broad adaptability make this litmus test attractive for field applications, particularly in the developing world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1038/ng1002-229 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bios.2004.11.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/c3cs35528d · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ja01379a039 · doi:10.1021/ja01379a039
- 10.1021/ar960022j · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)38872-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1139/m87-150 · doi:10.1139/m87-150
- 10.1128/jb.177.19.5644-5652.1995 · doi:10.1128/jb.177.19.5644-5652.1995
- 10.1126/science.2200121 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/346818a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/355564a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/355850a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073717 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/cr0306743 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.287.5454.820 · DOI · Paper page
- Brody E. N., 2000, J. Biotechnol., 74, 5
- 10.1021/ar960167q · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/anie.200804643 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ange.200804643 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80042-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-008-8029-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/anie.200906345 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ange.200906345 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.200702006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ange.200702006 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja803607z · doi:10.1021/ja803607z
- 10.1021/ja400150v · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nchem.1092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ac501070a · DOI
- 10.1021/ja8011066 · DOI
- 10.1039/C3CS60264H · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/cr030183i · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/cr300340p · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/1074-5521(94)90014-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/bi9812221 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00046-3 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja0281232 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/anie.200805966 · DOI
- 10.1002/ange.200805966 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki930 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ja905854a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ja067278x · doi:10.1021/ja067278x
- 10.1021/ja034775u · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt0193-60 · DOI · Paper page
- Brinchmann J. E., 1988, Clin. Exp. Immunol., 71, 182
- 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90038-8 · doi:10.1016/0022-1759(83)90038-8
- 10.1093/nar/17.15.6253 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90041-7 · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90041-7
- 10.1002/anie.201100477 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ange.201100477 · DOI
- 10.3390/biom3030563 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fm.2009.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01951.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01951.x
- 10.1128/AEM.68.10.4853-4862.2002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09085.x · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09085.x
- 10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00081-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1139/w04-080 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Zhou, W., Saran, R., & Liu, J. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00063 · Cited by 931
Optical Biosensors for the Detection of Pathogenic Microorganisms
Yoo, S. M., & Lee, S. Y. (2016) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.012 · Cited by 571
McConnell, E. M., Cozma, I., Mou, Q., Brennan, J. D., Lu, Y., & Li, Y. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00240f · Cited by 477
Self-citationNucleic Acid Biosensors: Recent Advances and Perspectives
Du, Y., & Dong, S. (2017) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04190 · Cited by 429
Point-of-care microfluidic devices for pathogen detection
Nasseri, B., Soleimani, N., Rabiee, N., Kalbasi, A., Karimi, M., & Hamblin, M. R. (2018) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2018.05.050 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Tram, K., Kanda, P., Salena, B. J., Huan, S., & Li, Y.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 12799-12802
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2162461857
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (DG 227594-2009)
- Sentinel Bioactive Paper Network
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21275044)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Translating Bacterial Detection by DNAzymes into a Litmus Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201407021
- The paper
- Tram, K., Kanda, P., Salena, B. J., Huan, S., & Li, Y. (2014). Translating Bacterial Detection by DNAzymes into a Litmus Test. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201407021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.